Everettian probabilities, the Deutsch-Wallace theorem and the Principal Principle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11591v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:43:37 GMT
• Title: Everettian probabilities, the Deutsch-Wallace theorem and the Principal Principle
• Authors: Harvey R. Brown and Gal Ben Porath
• Abstract summary: Itamar Pitowsky's thinking about probability in quantum theory from 1994 to 2008 is discussed. The status of David Lewis' influential Principal Principle is critically examined. The Deutsch-Wallace (DW) theorem in quantum mechanics is critically examined.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper is concerned with the nature of probability in physics, and in quantum mechanics in particular. It starts with a brief discussion of the evolution of Itamar Pitowsky's thinking about probability in quantum theory from 1994 to 2008, and the role of Gleason's 1957 theorem in his derivation of the Born Rule. Pitowsky's defence of probability therein as a logic of partial belief leads us into a broader discussion of probability in physics, in which the existence of objective "chances" is questioned, and the status of David Lewis' influential Principal Principle is critically examined. This is followed by a sketch of the work by David Deutsch and David Wallace which resulted in the Deutsch-Wallace (DW) theorem in Everettian quantum mechanics. It is noteworthy that the authors of this important decision-theoretic derivation of the Born Rule have different views concerning the meaning of probability. The theorem, which was the subject of a 2007 critique by Meir Hemmo and Pitowsky, is critically examined, along with recent related work by John Earman. Here our main argument is that the DW theorem does not provide a justification of the Principal Principle, contrary to claims by Wallace and Simon Saunders. A final section analyses recent claims to the effect that that the DW theorem is redundant, a conclusion that seems to be reinforced by consideration of probabilities in "deviant' branches in the Everettian multiverse.

Related papers

• Another quantum version of Sanov theorem [53.64687146666141]
  We study how to extend Sanov theorem to the quantum setting. We propose another quantum version of Sanov theorem by considering the quantum analog of the empirical distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T07:46:30Z)
• Machine Learning of the Prime Distribution [49.84018914962972]
  We provide a theoretical argument explaining the experimental observations of Yang-Hui He about the learnability of primes. We also posit that the ErdHos-Kac law would very unlikely be discovered by current machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T09:47:54Z)
• A Short Report on the Probability-Based Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  Popper notices how fundamental issues raised in quantum mechanics (QM) directly derive from unresolved probabilistic questions. This paper offers a brief overview of the structural theory of probability, recently published in a book, and applies it to QM in order to show its completeness. The whole probability-based interpretation of QM goes beyond the limits of a paper and these pages condense a few aspects of this theoretical scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T16:08:33Z)
• What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
  We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• Spin-1 photons, spin-1/2 electrons, Bell's inequalities, and Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics [0.0]
  The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox that argues for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics as a description of physical reality has been put to rest by John Bell's famous theorem. We discuss several variants of the Bell inequalities and explore the ways in which they demolish the arguments in favor of local hidden-variable theories. We also examine the roots of Feynman's attitude toward Bell's theorem in the context of Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T07:14:59Z)
• A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation [77.34726150561087]
  We present two alternative perspectives for the resolution of Hawking's information puzzle in black hole evaporation. One of them is the central role played by the existence of the interior singularity that we expect to be replaced by a more fundamental quantum gravity formulation. Both views rely on the notion that the standard effective quantum field theoretic perspective would require some deep modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T16:21:22Z)
• On the assumptions underlying KS-like contradictions [0.0]
  The Kochen-Specker theorem is one of the fundamental no-go theorems in quantum theory. We examine the hypotheses that, at the ontological level, lead to the KochenSpecker contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T17:56:05Z)
• Quantum Theory Needs No 'Interpretation' But 'Theoretical Formal-Conceptual Unity' (Or: Escaping Adan Cabello's "Map of Madness" With the Help of David Deutsch's Explanations) [0.0]
  We argue that there are reasons to believe that the creation of 'interpretations' for the theory of quanta has functioned as a trap designed by anti-realists. We will argue that the key to escape the anti-realist trap of interpretation is to recognize that --as Einstein told Heisenberg almost one century ago-- it is only the theory which can tell you what can be observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-01T19:10:06Z)
• Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
  Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.