An Approach to Evaluating Learning Algorithms for Decision Trees
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.13665v1
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:36:59 GMT
- Title: An Approach to Evaluating Learning Algorithms for Decision Trees
- Authors: Tianqi Xiao and Omer Nguena Timo and Florent Avellaneda and Yasir
Malik and Stefan Bruda
- Abstract summary: Low or unknown learning ability algorithms does not permit us to trust the produced software models.
We propose a novel oracle-centered approach to evaluate (the learning ability of) learning algorithms for decision trees.
- Score: 3.7798600249187295
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Learning algorithms produce software models for realising critical
classification tasks. Decision trees models are simpler than other models such
as neural network and they are used in various critical domains such as the
medical and the aeronautics. Low or unknown learning ability algorithms does
not permit us to trust the produced software models, which lead to costly test
activities for validating the models and to the waste of learning time in case
the models are likely to be faulty due to the learning inability. Methods for
evaluating the decision trees learning ability, as well as that for the other
models, are needed especially since the testing of the learned models is still
a hot topic. We propose a novel oracle-centered approach to evaluate (the
learning ability of) learning algorithms for decision trees. It consists of
generating data from reference trees playing the role of oracles, producing
learned trees with existing learning algorithms, and determining the degree of
correctness (DOE) of the learned trees by comparing them with the oracles. The
average DOE is used to estimate the quality of the learning algorithm. the We
assess five decision tree learning algorithms based on the proposed approach.
Related papers
- Learning accurate and interpretable decision trees [27.203303726977616]
We develop approaches to design decision tree learning algorithms given repeated access to data from the same domain.
We study the sample complexity of tuning prior parameters in Bayesian decision tree learning, and extend our results to decision tree regression.
We also study the interpretability of the learned decision trees and introduce a data-driven approach for optimizing the explainability versus accuracy trade-off using decision trees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T20:10:10Z) - Tree-Based Adaptive Model Learning [62.997667081978825]
We extend the Kearns-Vazirani learning algorithm to handle systems that change over time.
We present a new learning algorithm that can reuse and update previously learned behavior, implement it in the LearnLib library, and evaluate it on large examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-31T21:24:22Z) - Towards Diverse Evaluation of Class Incremental Learning: A Representation Learning Perspective [67.45111837188685]
Class incremental learning (CIL) algorithms aim to continually learn new object classes from incrementally arriving data.
We experimentally analyze neural network models trained by CIL algorithms using various evaluation protocols in representation learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T11:44:11Z) - Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddings [55.08537975896764]
There is an increasing need for active learning algorithms that are compatible with deep neural networks.
This article introduces BAIT, a practical representation of tractable, and high-performing active learning algorithm for neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-17T17:26:31Z) - Chow-Liu++: Optimal Prediction-Centric Learning of Tree Ising Models [30.62276301751904]
We introduce a new algorithm that combines elements of the Chow-Liu algorithm with tree metric reconstruction methods.
Our algorithm is robust to model misspecification and adversarial corruptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T21:09:29Z) - Learning Accurate Decision Trees with Bandit Feedback via Quantized
Gradient Descent [18.7724096545556]
Decision trees provide a rich family of highly non-linear but efficient models.
But learning trees is a challenging problem due to their highly discrete and non-differentiable decision boundaries.
We propose a reformulation of the tree learning problem that provides better conditioned gradients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-15T14:10:07Z) - Evolving Reinforcement Learning Algorithms [186.62294652057062]
We propose a method for meta-learning reinforcement learning algorithms.
The learned algorithms are domain-agnostic and can generalize to new environments not seen during training.
We highlight two learned algorithms which obtain good generalization performance over other classical control tasks, gridworld type tasks, and Atari games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-08T18:55:07Z) - MurTree: Optimal Classification Trees via Dynamic Programming and Search [61.817059565926336]
We present a novel algorithm for learning optimal classification trees based on dynamic programming and search.
Our approach uses only a fraction of the time required by the state-of-the-art and can handle datasets with tens of thousands of instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-24T17:06:55Z) - Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Learning Systems [4.8685842576962095]
We formulate the problem of how to find an individualized learning plan based on learner's latent traits.
We apply a model-free deep reinforcement learning algorithm that can effectively find the optimal learning policy.
We also develop a transition model estimator that emulates the learner's learning process using neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T18:04:03Z) - Automatic Gesture Recognition in Robot-assisted Surgery with
Reinforcement Learning and Tree Search [63.07088785532908]
We propose a framework based on reinforcement learning and tree search for joint surgical gesture segmentation and classification.
Our framework consistently outperforms the existing methods on the suturing task of JIGSAWS dataset in terms of accuracy, edit score and F1 score.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-20T13:12:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.