Domain adaptation under structural causal models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15764v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 04:26:51 GMT
• Title: Domain adaptation under structural causal models
• Authors: Yuansi Chen, Peter B\"uhlmann
• Abstract summary: Domain adaptation (DA) arises when the source data used to train a model is different from the target data used to test the model. Recent advances in DA have mainly been application-driven. We propose a theoretical framework via structural causal models that enables analysis and comparison of the prediction performance of DA methods.
• Score: 2.627046865670577
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Domain adaptation (DA) arises as an important problem in statistical machine learning when the source data used to train a model is different from the target data used to test the model. Recent advances in DA have mainly been application-driven and have largely relied on the idea of a common subspace for source and target data. To understand the empirical successes and failures of DA methods, we propose a theoretical framework via structural causal models that enables analysis and comparison of the prediction performance of DA methods. This framework also allows us to itemize the assumptions needed for the DA methods to have a low target error. Additionally, with insights from our theory, we propose a new DA method called CIRM that outperforms existing DA methods when both the covariates and label distributions are perturbed in the target data. We complement the theoretical analysis with extensive simulations to show the necessity of the devised assumptions. Reproducible synthetic and real data experiments are also provided to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of DA methods when parts of the assumptions in our theory are violated.

Related papers

• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling. Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability. In this paper, we aim to help address such challenges by developing an textitinfluence functions framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• Revisiting Spurious Correlation in Domain Generalization [12.745076668687748]
  We build a structural causal model (SCM) to describe the causality within data generation process. We further conduct a thorough analysis of the mechanisms underlying spurious correlation. In this regard, we propose to control confounding bias in OOD generalization by introducing a propensity score weighted estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T13:22:00Z)
• Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: A Perspective From Polytope Theory [9.771997770574947]
  We analyze how model reconstruction using counterfactuals can be improved. Our main contribution is to derive novel theoretical relationships between the error in model reconstruction and the number of counterfactual queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T18:52:47Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• Using causal inference to avoid fallouts in data-driven parametric analysis: a case study in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry [0.7566148383213173]
  The decision-making process in real-world implementations has been affected by a growing reliance on data-driven models. We investigated the synergetic pattern between the data-driven methods, empirical domain knowledge, and first-principles simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T13:54:58Z)
• Rethinking Distribution Shifts: Empirical Analysis and Inductive Modeling for Tabular Data [30.518020409197767]
  We build an empirical testbed comprising natural shifts across 5 datasets and 60,000 method configurations. We find $Y|X$-shifts are most prevalent on our testbed, in stark contrast to the heavy focus on $X$ (co)-shifts in the ML literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:25:10Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalization [107.0464488046289]
  This paper investigates the problem of learning robust, generalizable prediction models from a combination of datasets. Part of the challenge of learning robust models lies in the influence of unobserved confounders. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T08:18:06Z)
• Structural Regularization [0.0]
  We propose a novel method for modeling data by using structural models based on economic theory as regularizers for statistical models. We show that our method can outperform both the (misspecified) structural model and un-structural-regularized statistical models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T06:47:07Z)
• Adversarial Distributional Training for Robust Deep Learning [53.300984501078126]
  Adversarial training (AT) is among the most effective techniques to improve model robustness by augmenting training data with adversarial examples. Most existing AT methods adopt a specific attack to craft adversarial examples, leading to the unreliable robustness against other unseen attacks. In this paper, we introduce adversarial distributional training (ADT), a novel framework for learning robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-14T12:36:59Z)
• Few-shot Domain Adaptation by Causal Mechanism Transfer [107.08605582020866]
  We study few-shot supervised domain adaptation (DA) for regression problems, where only a few labeled target domain data and many labeled source domain data are available. Many of the current DA methods base their transfer assumptions on either parametrized distribution shift or apparent distribution similarities. We propose mechanism transfer, a meta-distributional scenario in which a data generating mechanism is invariant among domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T02:16:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.