Rule-Based Approach for Party-Based Sentiment Analysis in Legal Opinion Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05675v2
• Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:33:10 GMT
• Title: Rule-Based Approach for Party-Based Sentiment Analysis in Legal Opinion Texts
• Authors: Isanka Rajapaksha, Chanika Ruchini Mudalige, Dilini Karunarathna, Nisansa de Silva, Gathika Ratnayaka, and Amal Shehan Perera
• Abstract summary: Party-based sentiment analysis will play a key role in the automation system by identifying opinion values with respect to each legal parties in legal texts. Lawyers and legal officials have to spend considerable effort and time to obtain the required information manually from legal opinion texts.
• Score: 0.3364569898365254
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A document which elaborates opinions and arguments related to the previous court cases is known as a legal opinion text. Lawyers and legal officials have to spend considerable effort and time to obtain the required information manually from those documents when dealing with new legal cases. Hence, it provides much convenience to those individuals if there is a way to automate the process of extracting information from legal opinion texts. Party-based sentiment analysis will play a key role in the automation system by identifying opinion values with respect to each legal parties in legal texts.

Related papers

• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• A Deep Learning-Based System for Automatic Case Summarization [2.9141777969894966]
  This paper presents a deep learning-based system for efficient automatic case summarization. The system offers both supervised and unsupervised methods to generate concise and relevant summaries of lengthy legal case documents. Future work will focus on refining summarization techniques and exploring the application of our methods to other types of legal texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T01:18:10Z)
• MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
  Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness. Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases. We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z)
• Enhancing Pre-Trained Language Models with Sentence Position Embeddings for Rhetorical Roles Recognition in Legal Opinions [0.16385815610837165]
  The size of legal opinions continues to grow, making it increasingly challenging to develop a model that can accurately predict the rhetorical roles of legal opinions. We propose a novel model architecture for automatically predicting rhetorical roles using pre-trained language models (PLMs) enhanced with knowledge of sentence position information. Based on an annotated corpus from the LegalEval@SemEval2023 competition, we demonstrate that our approach requires fewer parameters, resulting in lower computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T20:33:55Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
• Legal Case Document Summarization: Extractive and Abstractive Methods and their Evaluation [11.502115682980559]
  Summarization of legal case judgement documents is a challenging problem in Legal NLP. Not much analyses exist on how different families of summarization models perform when applied to legal case documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T05:43:08Z)
• Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in Policy Design Analysis [52.77024349608834]
  This paper presents a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design. Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T10:57:47Z)
• Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documents [1.8025738207124173]
  We introduce a corpus of legal judgment documents in English that are segmented into topical and coherent parts. We develop baseline models for automatically predicting rhetorical roles in a legal document based on the annotated corpus. We show the application of rhetorical roles to improve performance on the tasks of summarization and legal judgment prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T11:12:44Z)
• Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles [3.285073688021526]
  This paper proposes a Rhetorical Roles (RR) system for segmenting a legal document into semantically coherent units. We develop a multitask learning-based deep learning model with document rhetorical role label shift as an auxiliary task for segmenting a legal document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T10:49:19Z)
• Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents [56.40163943394202]
  We release the Longformer-based pre-trained language model, named as Lawformer, for Chinese legal long documents understanding. We evaluate Lawformer on a variety of LegalAI tasks, including judgment prediction, similar case retrieval, legal reading comprehension, and legal question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-09T09:39:25Z)
• How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
  Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.