Privacy Preserving in Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring: A Differential Privacy Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06205v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 05:10:10 GMT
• Title: Privacy Preserving in Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring: A Differential Privacy Perspective
• Authors: Haoxiang Wang and Jiasheng Zhang and Chenbei Lu and Chenye Wu
• Abstract summary: We bridge the gap between theoretical accuracy of NILM inference and differential privacy's parameters. We propose a hierarchical framework to solve the multi-shot NILM problem.
• Score: 7.60875347889224
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Smart meter devices enable a better understanding of the demand at the potential risk of private information leakage. One promising solution to mitigating such risk is to inject noises into the meter data to achieve a certain level of differential privacy. In this paper, we cast one-shot non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) in the compressive sensing framework, and bridge the gap between theoretical accuracy of NILM inference and differential privacy's parameters. We then derive the valid theoretical bounds to offer insights on how the differential privacy parameters affect the NILM performance. Moreover, we generalize our conclusions by proposing the hierarchical framework to solve the multi-shot NILM problem. Numerical experiments verify our analytical results and offer better physical insights of differential privacy in various practical scenarios. This also demonstrates the significance of our work for the general privacy preserving mechanism design.

Related papers

• Empirical Privacy Variance [32.41387301450962]
  We show that models calibrated to the same $(varepsilon, delta)$-DP guarantee can exhibit significant variations in empirical privacy. We investigate the generality of this phenomenon across multiple dimensions and discuss why it is surprising and relevant. We propose two hypotheses, identify limitations in existing techniques like privacy auditing, and outline open questions for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T01:43:49Z)
• Differentially Private Random Feature Model [52.468511541184895]
  We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:31:08Z)
• Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  We propose an effective approach called masked differential privacy (DP), which allows for controlling sensitive regions where differential privacy is applied. Our method operates selectively on data and allows for defining non-sensitive-temporal regions without DP application or combining differential privacy with other privacy techniques within data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• The Effect of Quantization in Federated Learning: A Rényi Differential Privacy Perspective [15.349042342071439]
  Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging paradigm that holds great promise for privacy-preserving machine learning using distributed data. To enhance privacy, FL can be combined with Differential Privacy (DP), which involves adding Gaussian noise to the model weights. This research paper investigates the impact of quantization on privacy in FL systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T13:50:46Z)
• Initialization Matters: Privacy-Utility Analysis of Overparameterized Neural Networks [72.51255282371805]
  We prove a privacy bound for the KL divergence between model distributions on worst-case neighboring datasets. We find that this KL privacy bound is largely determined by the expected squared gradient norm relative to model parameters during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:13:22Z)
• Theoretically Principled Federated Learning for Balancing Privacy and Utility [61.03993520243198]
  We propose a general learning framework for the protection mechanisms that protects privacy via distorting model parameters. It can achieve personalized utility-privacy trade-off for each model parameter, on each client, at each communication round in federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T13:44:02Z)
• A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting [63.67296945525791]
  We propose a new differential privacy paradigm called estimate-verify-release (EVR) EVR paradigm first estimates the privacy parameter of a mechanism, then verifies whether it meets this guarantee, and finally releases the query output. Our empirical evaluation shows the newly proposed EVR paradigm improves the utility-privacy tradeoff for privacy-preserving machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T00:38:01Z)
• On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints [17.04261371990489]
  We show how to characterize the power of a statistical test under differential privacy in a plug-and-play fashion. We show that maintaining privacy results in a noticeable reduction in performance only when the level of privacy protection is very high. Finally, we demonstrate that the DP-SGLD algorithm, a private convex solver, can be employed for maximum likelihood estimation with a high degree of confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T12:55:53Z)
• Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees [65.3684804101664]
  We consider partial differential privacy (DP), which allows quantifying the privacy guarantee on a per-attribute basis. In this work, we study several basic data analysis and learning tasks, and design algorithms whose per-attribute privacy parameter is smaller that the best possible privacy parameter for the entire record of a person.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T22:43:50Z)
• A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functions [4.059849656394191]
  Differential privacy (DP) has been applied in deep learning for preserving privacy of the underlying training sets. Existing DP practice falls into three categories - objective perturbation, gradient perturbation and output perturbation. We propose a novel output perturbation framework by injecting DP noise into a randomly sampled neuron.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-03T11:10:05Z)
• DP-UTIL: Comprehensive Utility Analysis of Differential Privacy in Machine Learning [3.822543555265593]
  Differential Privacy (DP) has emerged as a rigorous formalism to reason about privacy leakage. In machine learning (ML), DP has been employed to limit/disclosure of training examples. For deep neural networks, gradient perturbation results in lowest privacy leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-24T08:40:28Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.