Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09296v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:07:20 GMT
- Title: Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality
- Authors: David I. Kaiser
- Abstract summary: Quantum mechanics predicts that measurements on particles in entangled states can be more strongly correlated than Bell's inequality would allow.
This chapter reviews three of the most significant loopholes, often dubbed the "locality," "fair-sampling," and "freedom-of-choice" loopholes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Bell's inequality sets a strict threshold for how strongly correlated the
outcomes of measurements on two or more particles can be, if the outcomes of
each measurement are independent of actions undertaken at arbitrarily distant
locations. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, predicts that measurements on
particles in entangled states can be more strongly correlated than Bell's
inequality would allow. Whereas experimental tests conducted over the past
half-century have consistently measured violations of Bell's
inequality---consistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics---the
experiments have been subject to one or more "loopholes," by means of which
certain alternatives to quantum theory could remain consistent with the
experimental results. This chapter reviews three of the most significant
loopholes, often dubbed the "locality," "fair-sampling," and
"freedom-of-choice" loopholes, and describes how recent experiments have
addressed them.
Related papers
- Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter [0.0]
Bell inequalities represent a milestone for contemporary Physics.
Strong debate is still ongoing on the actual meaning of Bell inequality tests.
Recent work achieves for the first time an experimental estimation of the entire Bell-CHSH parameter from a single entangled pair.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T08:11:40Z) - Proposal of an optical Bell's experiment to test the boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics [41.94295877935867]
It was recently noted the existence of an apparently discontinuous boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics.
We propose to explore this boundary by recording the distribution of outcomes of a given parity interrupted by outcomes of the other parity.
The features of these distributions for small rotations of the angle settings near critical points may indicate whether the underlying process is in-deterministic or not.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T14:48:08Z) - A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device.
Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z) - Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality [0.0]
We show that there are quantum correlations that cannot be simulated with hidden variables.
We show that there is a feasible experiment that can discard any hidden-variable theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T17:39:36Z) - Optimizing Fictitious States for Bell Inequality Violation in Bipartite Qubit Systems [5.151248813215795]
We show that if Bell inequality violation is observed with a fictitious state, then it implies the same for a quantum sub-state.
We further show analytically that the basis which diagonalizes the spin-spin correlations is optimal for constructing fictitious states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T18:05:44Z) - Single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter [0.0]
We present the first single-pair Bell inequality test, able to obtain a Bell parameter value for every entangled pair detected.
This is made possible by exploiting sequential weak measurements, allowing to measure non-commuting observables in sequence on the same state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T18:36:02Z) - Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four
quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements.
Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z) - Graph-Theoretic Framework for Self-Testing in Bell Scenarios [37.067444579637076]
Quantum self-testing is the task of certifying quantum states and measurements using the output statistics solely.
We present a new approach for quantum self-testing in Bell non-locality scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-27T08:15:01Z) - Experimental tests of Multiplicative Bell Inequalities [0.7036032466145111]
A new class of multiplicative Bell inequalities originating from a volume game has been proposed.
We experimentally test the Tsirelson bounds of these inequalities using polarisation-entangled photons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-08T18:14:49Z) - Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false.
The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.