RADAR-X: An Interactive Mixed Initiative Planning Interface Pairing Contrastive Explanations and Revised Plan Suggestions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09644v2
• Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:36:02 GMT
• Title: RADAR-X: An Interactive Mixed Initiative Planning Interface Pairing Contrastive Explanations and Revised Plan Suggestions
• Authors: Karthik Valmeekam, Sarath Sreedharan, Sailik Sengupta, Subbarao Kambhampati
• Abstract summary: We present our decision support system RADAR-X that showcases the ability to engage the user in an interactive explanatory dialogue. The system uses this dialogue to elicit the user's latent preferences and provides revised plan suggestions through three different interaction strategies.
• Score: 30.98066157540983
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Decision support systems seek to enable informed decision-making. In the recent years, automated planning techniques have been leveraged to empower such systems to better aid the human-in-the-loop. The central idea for such decision support systems is to augment the capabilities of the human-in-the-loop with automated planning techniques and enhance the quality of decision-making. In addition to providing planning support, effective decision support systems must be able to provide intuitive explanations based on specific user queries for proposed decisions to its end users. Using this as motivation, we present our decision support system RADAR-X that showcases the ability to engage the user in an interactive explanatory dialogue by first enabling them to specify an alternative to a proposed decision (which we refer to as foils), and then providing contrastive explanations to these user-specified foils which helps the user understand why a specific plan was chosen over the alternative (or foil). Furthermore, the system uses this dialogue to elicit the user's latent preferences and provides revised plan suggestions through three different interaction strategies.

Related papers

• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Strength Lies in Differences! Towards Effective Non-collaborative Dialogues via Tailored Strategy Planning [69.5677514160986]
  We investigate non-collaborative dialogue agents, which are expected to engage in strategic conversations with diverse users. This poses two main challenges for existing dialogue agents. We propose Trip to enhance the capability in tailored strategic planning, incorporating a user-aware strategic planning module and a population-based training paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T14:38:16Z)
• User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI [2.6396287656676725]
  How IDSSs should select explanations to enhance user decision-making remains an open question. This paper proposes X-Selector, a method for selectively presenting XAI explanations. It enables IDSSs to strategically guide users to an AI-suggested decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T03:21:25Z)
• Optimising Human-AI Collaboration by Learning Convincing Explanations [62.81395661556852]
  We propose a method for a collaborative system that remains safe by having a human making decisions. Ardent enables efficient and effective decision-making by adapting to individual preferences for explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:00:16Z)
• Decision-Oriented Dialogue for Human-AI Collaboration [62.367222979251444]
  We describe a class of tasks called decision-oriented dialogues, in which AI assistants such as large language models (LMs) must collaborate with one or more humans via natural language to help them make complex decisions. We formalize three domains in which users face everyday decisions: (1) choosing an assignment of reviewers to conference papers, (2) planning a multi-step itinerary in a city, and (3) negotiating travel plans for a group of friends. For each task, we build a dialogue environment where agents receive a reward based on the quality of the final decision they reach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T17:50:02Z)
• Learning Personalized Decision Support Policies [56.949897454209186]
  $texttModiste$ is an interactive tool to learn personalized decision support policies. We find that personalized policies outperform offline policies, and, in the cost-aware setting, reduce the incurred cost with minimal degradation to performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T17:53:34Z)
• Subgoal-Based Explanations for Unreliable Intelligent Decision Support Systems [22.20142645430695]
  We introduce a novel explanation type, subgoal-based explanations, for planning-based IDS systems. We demonstrate that subgoal-based explanations lead to improved user task performance, improve user ability to distinguish optimal and suboptimal IDS recommendations, are preferred by users, and enable more robust user performance in the case of IDS failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T21:13:22Z)
• Towards Personalized Explanation of Robot Path Planning via User Feedback [1.7231251035416644]
  We present a system for generating personalized explanations of robot path planning via user feedback. The system is capable of detecting and resolving any preference conflict via user interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T15:10:43Z)
• Intelligent Decision Support System for Updating Control Plans [0.0]
  This paper proposes an intelligent DSS for quality control planning. The proposed RS makes it possible to continuously update the control plans in order to be adapted to the actual process quality situation. A numerical application is performed in a real case study in order to illustrate the feasibility and practicability of the proposed DSS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T06:16:51Z)
• Tradeoff-Focused Contrastive Explanation for MDP Planning [7.929642367937801]
  In real-world applications of planning, planning agents' decisions can involve complex tradeoffs among competing objectives. It can be difficult for the end-users to understand why an agent decides on a particular planning solution on the basis of its objective values. We propose an approach, based on contrastive explanation, that enables a multi-objective MDP planning agent to explain its decisions in a way that communicates its tradeoff rationale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T17:17:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.