Sensing Ambiguity in Henry James' "The Turn of the Screw"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10832v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:53:41 GMT
• Title: Sensing Ambiguity in Henry James' "The Turn of the Screw"
• Authors: Victor Makarenkov and Yael Segalovitz
• Abstract summary: This work brings together computational text analysis and literary analysis to demonstrate the extent to which ambiguity in certain texts plays a key role in shaping meaning. We revisit the discussion, well known in the humanities, about the role ambiguity plays in Henry James' 19th century novella, The Turn of the Screw. We demonstrate that cosine similarity and word mover's distance are sensitive enough to detect ambiguity in its most subtle literary form.
• Score: 0.8528384027684192
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Fields such as the philosophy of language, continental philosophy, and literary studies have long established that human language is, at its essence, ambiguous and that this quality, although challenging to communication, enriches language and points to the complexity of human thought. On the other hand, in the NLP field there have been ongoing efforts aimed at disambiguation for various downstream tasks. This work brings together computational text analysis and literary analysis to demonstrate the extent to which ambiguity in certain texts plays a key role in shaping meaning and thus requires analysis rather than elimination. We revisit the discussion, well known in the humanities, about the role ambiguity plays in Henry James' 19th century novella, The Turn of the Screw. We model each of the novella's two competing interpretations as a topic and computationally demonstrate that the duality between them exists consistently throughout the work and shapes, rather than obscures, its meaning. We also demonstrate that cosine similarity and word mover's distance are sensitive enough to detect ambiguity in its most subtle literary form, despite doubts to the contrary raised by literary scholars. Our analysis is built on topic word lists and word embeddings from various sources. We first claim, and then empirically show, the interdependence between computational analysis and close reading performed by a human expert.

Related papers

• Latent Structures of Intertextuality in French Fiction [0.0]
  This paper argues that the field of computational literary studies is the ideal place to conduct a study of intertextuality. We present a work on a corpus of more than 12.000 French fictions from the 18th, 19th and early 20th century.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T10:50:40Z)
• That was the last straw, we need more: Are Translation Systems Sensitive to Disambiguating Context? [64.38544995251642]
  We study semantic ambiguities that exist in the source (English in this work) itself. We focus on idioms that are open to both literal and figurative interpretations. We find that current MT models consistently translate English idioms literally, even when the context suggests a figurative interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T06:38:49Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity [136.8068419824318]
  Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding. We characterize ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence. We show that a multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:57:58Z)
• Shades of meaning: Uncovering the geometry of ambiguous word representations through contextualised language models [6.760960482418417]
  Lexical ambiguity presents a profound and enduring challenge to the language sciences. Our work offers new insight into psychological understanding of lexical ambiguity through a series of simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-26T14:47:38Z)
• Paraphrasing, textual entailment, and semantic similarity above word level [2.411299055446423]
  dissertation explores the linguistic and computational aspects of the meaning relations that can hold between two or more complex linguistic expressions. In particular, it focuses on Paraphrasing, Textual Entailment, Contradiction, and Semantic Similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T15:07:49Z)
• The Causal Structure of Semantic Ambiguities [0.0]
  We identify two features: (1) joint plausibility degrees of different possible interpretations, and (2) causal structures according to which certain words play a more substantial role in the processes. We applied this theory to a dataset of ambiguous phrases extracted from Psycholinguistics literature and their human plausibility collected by us.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T12:56:34Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• RELIC: Retrieving Evidence for Literary Claims [29.762552250403544]
  We use a large-scale dataset of 78K literary quotations to formulate the novel task of literary evidence retrieval. We implement a RoBERTa-based dense passage retriever for this task that outperforms existing pretrained information retrieval baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T16:56:08Z)
• It's not Rocket Science : Interpreting Figurative Language in Narratives [48.84507467131819]
  We study the interpretation of two non-compositional figurative languages (idioms and similes) Our experiments show that models based solely on pre-trained language models perform substantially worse than humans on these tasks. We additionally propose knowledge-enhanced models, adopting human strategies for interpreting figurative language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T21:46:35Z)
• Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context [65.08205006886591]
  We operationalise the lexical ambiguity of a word as the entropy of meanings it can take. We find significant correlations between our estimate of ambiguity and the number of synonyms a word has in WordNet. This suggests that, in the presence of ambiguity, speakers compensate by making contexts more informative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T17:19:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.