Causality-Aware Neighborhood Methods for Recommender Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09442v2
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 05:57:52 GMT
- Title: Causality-Aware Neighborhood Methods for Recommender Systems
- Authors: Masahiro Sato, Sho Takemori, Janmajay Singh, Qian Zhang
- Abstract summary: Business objectives of recommenders, such as increasing sales, are aligned with the causal effect of recommendations.
Previous recommenders employ the inverse propensity scoring (IPS) in causal inference.
We develop robust ranking methods for the causal effect of recommendations.
- Score: 3.0919302844782717
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The business objectives of recommenders, such as increasing sales, are
aligned with the causal effect of recommendations. Previous recommenders
targeting for the causal effect employ the inverse propensity scoring (IPS) in
causal inference. However, IPS is prone to suffer from high variance. The
matching estimator is another representative method in causal inference field.
It does not use propensity and hence free from the above variance problem. In
this work, we unify traditional neighborhood recommendation methods with the
matching estimator, and develop robust ranking methods for the causal effect of
recommendations. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods
outperform various baselines in ranking metrics for the causal effect. The
results suggest that the proposed methods can achieve more sales and user
engagement than previous recommenders.
Related papers
- Preference Diffusion for Recommendation [50.8692409346126]
We propose PreferDiff, a tailored optimization objective for DM-based recommenders.
PreferDiff transforms BPR into a log-likelihood ranking objective to better capture user preferences.
It is the first personalized ranking loss designed specifically for DM-based recommenders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T01:02:04Z) - Revisiting Reciprocal Recommender Systems: Metrics, Formulation, and Method [60.364834418531366]
We propose five new evaluation metrics that comprehensively and accurately assess the performance of RRS.
We formulate the RRS from a causal perspective, formulating recommendations as bilateral interventions.
We introduce a reranking strategy to maximize matching outcomes, as measured by the proposed metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T07:21:02Z) - Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model.
This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference.
We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z) - Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior.
We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference.
We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z) - Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR)
CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism.
We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z) - CausPref: Causal Preference Learning for Out-of-Distribution
Recommendation [36.22965012642248]
The current recommender system is still vulnerable to the distribution shift of users and items in realistic scenarios.
We propose to incorporate the recommendation-specific DAG learner into a novel causal preference-based recommendation framework named CausPref.
Our approach surpasses the benchmark models significantly under types of out-of-distribution settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-08T16:42:03Z) - Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Bandit [18.077963117600785]
We study how to recommend an item at each step to maximize the expected reward.
We then propose the fair causal bandit (F-UCB) for achieving the counterfactual individual fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-21T23:44:48Z) - Online Evaluation Methods for the Causal Effect of Recommendations [0.20305676256390934]
We propose the first interleaving methods that can efficiently compare recommendation models in terms of causal effects.
We measure the outcomes of both items on an interleaved list and items not on the interleaved list, since the causal effect is the difference between outcomes with and without recommendations.
We then verify the unbiasedness and efficiency of online evaluation methods through simulated online experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T12:12:59Z) - Probabilistic and Variational Recommendation Denoising [56.879165033014026]
Learning from implicit feedback is one of the most common cases in the application of recommender systems.
We propose probabilistic and variational recommendation denoising for implicit feedback.
We employ the proposed DPI and DVAE on four state-of-the-art recommendation models and conduct experiments on three datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-20T08:59:44Z) - Unbiased Learning for the Causal Effect of Recommendation [8.849159720632612]
This paper proposes an unbiased learning framework for the causal effect of recommendation.
We develop an unbiased learning method for the causal effect extension of a ranking metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T07:30:44Z) - Counterfactual Evaluation of Slate Recommendations with Sequential
Reward Interactions [18.90946044396516]
Music streaming, video streaming, news recommendation, and e-commerce services often engage with content in a sequential manner.
Providing and evaluating good sequences of recommendations is therefore a central problem for these services.
We propose a new counterfactual estimator that allows for sequential interactions in the rewards with lower variance in anally unbiased manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-25T17:58:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.