Understanding Team Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence from the perspective of Geographic Distance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13560v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 11:06:38 GMT
• Title: Understanding Team Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence from the perspective of Geographic Distance
• Authors: Xuli Tang, Xin Li, Ying Ding, Feicheng Ma
• Abstract summary: The United States produced the largest number of single-country and internationally collaborated AI publications. China has played an important role in international collaborations in AI after 2010.
• Score: 7.097316676566972
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper analyzes team collaboration in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) from the perspective of geographic distance. We obtained 1,584,175 AI related publications during 1950-2019 from the Microsoft Academic Graph. Three latitude-and-longitude-based indicators were employed to quantify the geographic distance of collaborations in AI over time at domestic and international levels. The results show team collaborations in AI has been more popular in the field over time with around 42,000 (38.4%) multiple-affiliation AI publications in 2019. The changes in geographic distances of team collaborations indicate the increase of breadth and density for both domestic and international collaborations in AI over time. In addition, the United States produced the largest number of single-country and internationally collaborated AI publications, and China has played an important role in international collaborations in AI after 2010.

Related papers

• Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024 [15.531650534547945]
  The AI Index report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence (AI) The AI Index is recognized globally as one of the most credible and authoritative sources for data and insights on AI. This year's edition surpasses all previous ones in size, scale, and scope, reflecting the growing significance that AI is coming to hold in all of our lives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T20:59:57Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together [5.227075179857056]
  We analyze a dataset of over 350,000 AI scientists and 5,000,000 AI papers. We find that since the year 2000, China and the U.S. have been leading the field in terms of impact, novelty, productivity, and workforce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:47:51Z)
• Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytelling [59.08591308749448]
  We interviewed eighteen data workers from both industry and academia to learn where and how they would like to collaborate with AI. Surprisingly, though the participants showed excitement about collaborating with AI, many of them also expressed reluctance and pointed out nuanced reasons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T15:30:05Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence [74.2630823914258]
  The report examines eight domains of typical urban settings on which AI is likely to have impact over the coming years. It aims to provide the general public with a scientifically and technologically accurate portrayal of the current state of AI. The charge for this report was given to the panel by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Barbara Grosz of Harvard University.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T18:35:36Z)
• Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
  We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics. The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z)
• On the Evolution of A.I. and Machine Learning: Towards a Meta-level Measuring and Understanding Impact, Influence, and Leadership at Premier A.I. Conferences [0.26999000177990923]
  We present measures allowing the analyses of AI and machine learning researchers' impact, influence, and leadership over the last decades. We look at papers published at the flagship AI and machine learning conferences since the first International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) held in 1969.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T03:41:12Z)
• Internationalizing AI: Evolution and Impact of Distance Factors [6.045548929961739]
  International collaboration in the field of AI is not prevalent (only 15.7%) The United States and China have promoted the international collaboration in the field of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T00:44:53Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• The 5th AI City Challenge [51.83023045451549]
  The fifth AI City Challenge attracted 305 participating teams across 38 countries. The evaluation was conducted on both algorithmic effectiveness and computational efficiency. Results show the promise of AI in Smarter Transportation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T19:15:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.