Reinforcement Learning for Flexibility Design Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00355v2
• Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:35:06 GMT
• Title: Reinforcement Learning for Flexibility Design Problems
• Authors: Yehua Wei, Lei Zhang, Ruiyi Zhang, Shijing Si, Hao Zhang, Lawrence Carin
• Abstract summary: We develop a reinforcement learning framework for flexibility design problems. Empirical results show that the RL-based method consistently finds better solutions than classical methods.
• Score: 77.37213643948108
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Flexibility design problems are a class of problems that appear in strategic decision-making across industries, where the objective is to design a ($e.g.$, manufacturing) network that affords flexibility and adaptivity. The underlying combinatorial nature and stochastic objectives make flexibility design problems challenging for standard optimization methods. In this paper, we develop a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for flexibility design problems. Specifically, we carefully design mechanisms with noisy exploration and variance reduction to ensure empirical success and show the unique advantage of RL in terms of fast-adaptation. Empirical results show that the RL-based method consistently finds better solutions compared to classical heuristics.

Related papers

• Can Learned Optimization Make Reinforcement Learning Less Difficult? [70.5036361852812]
  We consider whether learned optimization can help overcome reinforcement learning difficulties. Our method, Learned Optimization for Plasticity, Exploration and Non-stationarity (OPEN), meta-learns an update rule whose input features and output structure are informed by previously proposed to these difficulties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:55:23Z)
• Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Framework for Mixed-Variable Problems [0.7146036252503987]
  We introduce a hybrid Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework that synergizes RL for discrete variable selection with Bayesian Optimization for continuous variable adjustment. Our method consistently outperforms traditional RL, random search, and standalone Bayesian optimization in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T21:42:33Z)
• Instance-Conditioned Adaptation for Large-scale Generalization of Neural Combinatorial Optimization [15.842155380912002]
  This work proposes a novel Instance-Conditioned Adaptation Model (ICAM) for better large-scale generalization of neural optimization. In particular, we design a powerful yet lightweight instance-conditioned Routing adaptation module for the NCO model. We develop an efficient three-stage reinforcement learning-based training scheme that enables the model to learn cross-scale features without any labeled optimal solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T08:00:19Z)
• Generative Inverse Design of Metamaterials with Functional Responses by Interpretable Learning [3.931881794708454]
  We propose the Random-forest-based Interpretable Generative Inverse Design (RIGID) RIGID is a single-shot inverse design method for fast generation of metamaterial designs with on-demand functional behaviors. We validate RIGID on acoustic and optical metamaterial design problems, each with fewer than 250 training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T04:24:03Z)
• Accelerate Presolve in Large-Scale Linear Programming via Reinforcement Learning [92.31528918811007]
  We propose a simple and efficient reinforcement learning framework -- namely, reinforcement learning for presolve (RL4Presolve) -- to tackle (P1)-(P3) simultaneously. Experiments on two solvers and eight benchmarks (real-world and synthetic) demonstrate that RL4Presolve significantly and consistently improves the efficiency of solving large-scale LPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T09:51:59Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Stepwise Fairness Constraints [50.538878453547966]
  We introduce the study of reinforcement learning with stepwise fairness constraints. We provide learning algorithms with strong theoretical guarantees in regard to policy optimality and fairness violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T04:06:23Z)
• Revisiting GANs by Best-Response Constraint: Perspective, Methodology, and Application [49.66088514485446]
  Best-Response Constraint (BRC) is a general learning framework to explicitly formulate the potential dependency of the generator on the discriminator. We show that even with different motivations and formulations, a variety of existing GANs ALL can be uniformly improved by our flexible BRC methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T12:42:41Z)
• Reversible Action Design for Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning [35.50454156611722]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently emerged as a new framework to tackle these problems. We propose a general RL framework that not only exhibits state-of-the-art empirical performance but also generalizes to a variety class of COPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T18:05:42Z)
• Optimization-Inspired Learning with Architecture Augmentations and Control Mechanisms for Low-Level Vision [74.9260745577362]
  This paper proposes a unified optimization-inspired learning framework to aggregate Generative, Discriminative, and Corrective (GDC) principles. We construct three propagative modules to effectively solve the optimization models with flexible combinations. Experiments across varied low-level vision tasks validate the efficacy and adaptability of GDC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T03:24:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.