On Baselines for Local Feature Attributions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00905v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:48:42 GMT
• Title: On Baselines for Local Feature Attributions
• Authors: Johannes Haug, Stefan Z\"urn, Peter El-Jiz, Gjergji Kasneci
• Abstract summary: Local feature attribution methods help to explain black box models. Most attribution models compare the importance of input features with a reference value, often called baseline. Recent studies show that the baseline can heavily impact the quality of feature attributions.
• Score: 6.700433100198165
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: High-performing predictive models, such as neural nets, usually operate as black boxes, which raises serious concerns about their interpretability. Local feature attribution methods help to explain black box models and are therefore a powerful tool for assessing the reliability and fairness of predictions. To this end, most attribution models compare the importance of input features with a reference value, often called baseline. Recent studies show that the baseline can heavily impact the quality of feature attributions. Yet, we frequently find simplistic baselines, such as the zero vector, in practice. In this paper, we show empirically that baselines can significantly alter the discriminative power of feature attributions. We conduct our analysis on tabular data sets, thus complementing recent works on image data. Besides, we propose a new taxonomy of baseline methods. Our experimental study illustrates the sensitivity of popular attribution models to the baseline, thus laying the foundation for a more in-depth discussion on sensible baseline methods for tabular data.

Related papers

• Explaining the Unexplained: Revealing Hidden Correlations for Better Interpretability [1.8274323268621635]
  Real Explainer (RealExp) is an interpretability method that decouples the Shapley Value into individual feature importance and feature correlation importance. RealExp enhances interpretability by precisely quantifying both individual feature contributions and their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T10:50:50Z)
• Enhancement of Approximation Spaces by the Use of Primals and Neighborhood [0.0]
  We introduce four new generalized rough set models that draw inspiration from "neighborhoods and primals" We claim that the current models can preserve nearly all significant aspects associated with the rough set model. We also demonstrate that the new strategy we define for our everyday health-related problem yields more accurate findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T18:49:13Z)
• BECAUSE: Bilinear Causal Representation for Generalizable Offline Model-based Reinforcement Learning [39.090104460303415]
  offline model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) enhances data efficiency by utilizing pre-collected datasets to learn models and policies. This paper first identifies the primary source of this mismatch comes from the underlying confounders present in offline data. We introduce textbfBilintextbfEar textbfCAUSal rtextbfEpresentation(BECAUSE), an algorithm to capture causal representation for both states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:59:23Z)
• Prospector Heads: Generalized Feature Attribution for Large Models & Data [82.02696069543454]
  We introduce prospector heads, an efficient and interpretable alternative to explanation-based attribution methods. We demonstrate how prospector heads enable improved interpretation and discovery of class-specific patterns in input data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T23:01:28Z)
• On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
  Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach. We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset. We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z)
• Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations [52.498055901649025]
  'Model guidance' is the idea of regularizing the models' explanations to ensure that they are "right for the right reasons" We conduct an in-depth evaluation across various loss functions, attribution methods, models, and 'guidance depths' on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets. Specifically, we guide the models via bounding box annotations, which are much cheaper to obtain than the commonly used segmentation masks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T15:34:50Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Towards Open-World Feature Extrapolation: An Inductive Graph Learning Approach [80.8446673089281]
  We propose a new learning paradigm with graph representation and learning. Our framework contains two modules: 1) a backbone network (e.g., feedforward neural nets) as a lower model takes features as input and outputs predicted labels; 2) a graph neural network as an upper model learns to extrapolate embeddings for new features via message passing over a feature-data graph built from observed data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T09:02:45Z)
• Boxhead: A Dataset for Learning Hierarchical Representations [16.036906124241835]
  We introduce Boxhead, a dataset with hierarchically structured ground-truth generative factors. We observe that hierarchical models generally outperform single-layer VAEs in terms of disentanglement of hierarchically arranged factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T17:15:25Z)
• Estimating the Robustness of Classification Models by the Structure of the Learned Feature-Space [10.418647759223964]
  We argue that fixed testsets are only able to capture a small portion of possible data variations and are thus limited and prone to generate new overfitted solutions. To overcome these drawbacks, we suggest to estimate the robustness of a model directly from the structure of its learned feature-space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T10:52:29Z)
• Generative Counterfactuals for Neural Networks via Attribute-Informed Perturbation [51.29486247405601]
  We design a framework to generate counterfactuals for raw data instances with the proposed Attribute-Informed Perturbation (AIP) By utilizing generative models conditioned with different attributes, counterfactuals with desired labels can be obtained effectively and efficiently. Experimental results on real-world texts and images demonstrate the effectiveness, sample quality as well as efficiency of our designed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T08:37:13Z)
• Explainable Matrix -- Visualization for Global and Local Interpretability of Random Forest Classification Ensembles [78.6363825307044]
  We propose Explainable Matrix (ExMatrix), a novel visualization method for Random Forest (RF) interpretability. It employs a simple yet powerful matrix-like visual metaphor, where rows are rules, columns are features, and cells are rules predicates. ExMatrix applicability is confirmed via different examples, showing how it can be used in practice to promote RF models interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T21:03:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.