Gender Imbalance and Spatiotemporal Patterns of Contributions to Citizen
Science Projects: the case of Zooniverse
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02695v1
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:57:51 GMT
- Title: Gender Imbalance and Spatiotemporal Patterns of Contributions to Citizen
Science Projects: the case of Zooniverse
- Authors: Khairunnisa Ibrahim, Samuel Khodursky, Taha Yasseri
- Abstract summary: We report on the uneven geographical distribution of the citizen scientist and model the variations among countries based on the socio-economic conditions.
We report on the temporal features of contributions as well as the leisurely nature of participation suggested by the time of the day that the citizen scientists were the most active.
Our findings can help attract the attention of public and private stakeholders, as well as to inform the design of the platforms and science policy making processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Citizen Science is research undertaken by professional scientists and members
of the public collaboratively. Despite numerous benefits of citizen science for
both the advancement of science and the community of the citizen scientists,
there is still no comprehensive knowledge of patterns of contributions, and the
demography of contributors to citizen science projects. In this paper we
provide a first overview of spatiotemporal and gender distribution of citizen
science workforce by analyzing 54 million classifications contributed by more
than 340 thousand citizen science volunteers from 198 countries to one of the
largest citizen science platforms, Zooniverse. First we report on the uneven
geographical distribution of the citizen scientist and model the variations
among countries based on the socio-economic conditions as well as the level of
research investment in each country. Analyzing the temporal features of
contributions, we report on high "burstiness" of participation instances as
well as the leisurely nature of participation suggested by the time of the day
that the citizen scientists were the most active. Finally, we discuss the
gender imbalance among citizen scientists (about 30% female) and compare it
with other collaborative projects as well as the gender distribution in more
formal scientific activities. Citizen science projects need further attention
from outside of the academic community, and our findings can help attract the
attention of public and private stakeholders, as well as to inform the design
of the platforms and science policy making processes.
Related papers
- Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Cultural Differences and Perverse Incentives in Science Create a Bad Mix: Exploring Country-Level Publication Bias in Select ACM Conferences [0.0789257770465417]
National governments are helping to build well-funded teams of scientists to serve nationalistic ambitions.
We have found evidence that indicates significant inequality among the publication rates of individual scientists from various countries.
Scientists who were affiliated with the top-5 countries were found to be contributing significantly more to the inequality in publication rates than others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T18:52:59Z) - Network Analysis of the iNaturalist Citizen Science Community [0.6118897979046375]
We use the iNaturalist citizen science platform as a case study to analyze the structure of citizen science projects.
We propose a novel unique benchmark for network science research by using the iNaturalist data to create a network which has an unusual structure relative to other common benchmark networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T00:41:13Z) - Gender Inequalities: Women Researchers Require More Knowledge in
Specific and Experimental Topics [1.4916971861796386]
This study analyzes the relationship between regional and gender identities, topics, and knowledge status.
We find that gender inequalities are merged with both regional-specific characteristics and global common patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-05T05:36:06Z) - Lessons Learned from a Citizen Science Project for Natural Language
Processing [53.48988266271858]
Citizen Science is an alternative to crowdsourcing that is relatively unexplored in the context of NLP.
We conduct an exploratory study into engaging different groups of volunteers in Citizen Science for NLP by re-annotating parts of a pre-existing crowdsourced dataset.
Our results show that this can yield high-quality annotations and attract motivated volunteers, but also requires considering factors such as scalability, participation over time, and legal and ethical issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-25T14:08:53Z) - Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically
Matched Paraphrases [50.67030449927206]
SPICED is the first paraphrase dataset of scientific findings annotated for degree of information change.
SPICED contains 6,000 scientific finding pairs extracted from news stories, social media discussions, and full texts of original papers.
Models trained on SPICED improve downstream performance on evidence retrieval for fact checking of real-world scientific claims.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T07:44:38Z) - KnowledgeShovel: An AI-in-the-Loop Document Annotation System for
Scientific Knowledge Base Construction [46.56643271476249]
KnowledgeShovel is an Al-in-the-Loop document annotation system for researchers to construct scientific knowledge bases.
The design of KnowledgeShovel introduces a multi-step multi-modalAI collaboration pipeline to improve data accuracy while reducing the human burden.
A follow-up user evaluation with 7 geoscience researchers shows that KnowledgeShovel can enable efficient construction of scientific knowledge bases with satisfactory accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T11:38:18Z) - Women, artificial intelligence, and key positions in collaboration
networks: Towards a more equal scientific ecosystem [0.0]
This study investigates the effects of several driving factors on acquiring key positions in scientific collaboration networks through a gender lens.
It was found that, regardless of gender, scientific performance in terms of quantity and impact plays a crucial in possessing the "social researcher" in the network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T15:15:04Z) - Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective.
Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research.
This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z) - Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators
for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines.
We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA.
FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.