Gender Inequalities: Women Researchers Require More Knowledge in Specific and Experimental Topics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01964v1
• Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 05:36:06 GMT
• Title: Gender Inequalities: Women Researchers Require More Knowledge in Specific and Experimental Topics
• Authors: Shiqi Tang, Dongyi Wang, Jianhua Hou
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes the relationship between regional and gender identities, topics, and knowledge status. We find that gender inequalities are merged with both regional-specific characteristics and global common patterns.
• Score: 1.4916971861796386
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Gender inequalities in science have long been observed globally. Studies have demonstrated it through survey data or published literature, focusing on the interests of subjects or authors; few, however, examined the manifestation of gender inequalities on researchers' knowledge status. This study analyzes the relationship between regional and gender identities, topics, and knowledge status while revealing the female labor division in science and scientific research using online Q&A from researchers. We find that gender inequalities are merged with both regional-specific characteristics and global common patterns. Women's field and topic distribution within fields are influenced by regions, yet the prevalent topics are consistent in all regions. Women are more involved in specific topics, particularly topics about experiments with weaker levels of knowledge and they are of less assistance. To promote inequality in science, the scientific community should pay more attention to reducing the knowledge gap and encourage women to work on unexplored topics and areas.

Related papers

• Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approach [1.1599570446840546]
  We present a semi-automated way to narrow down the search results in the different phases of selection stage in the PRISMA flowchart. We examine literature from computer science and the social sciences from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the challenges and opportunities for future research dedicated to measuring online sexism and misogyny.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T11:34:39Z)
• 15 Years of Algorithmic Fairness -- Scoping Review of Interdisciplinary Developments in the Field [0.0]
  This paper presents a scoping review of algorithmic fairness research over the past fifteen years. All articles come from the computer science and legal field and focus on AI algorithms with potential discriminatory effects on population groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T07:50:01Z)
• Academic competitions [61.592427413342975]
  This chapter provides a survey of academic challenges in the context of machine learning and related fields. We review the most influential competitions in the last few years and analyze challenges per area of knowledge. The aims of scientific challenges, their goals, major achievements and expectations for the next few years are reviewed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T01:01:04Z)
• Investigating Participation Mechanisms in EU Code Week [68.8204255655161]
  Digital competence (DC) is a broad set of skills, attitudes, and knowledge for confident, critical and use of digital technologies. The aim of the manuscript is to offer a detailed and comprehensive statistical description of Code Week's participation in the EU Member States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T19:16:03Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Women, artificial intelligence, and key positions in collaboration networks: Towards a more equal scientific ecosystem [0.0]
  This study investigates the effects of several driving factors on acquiring key positions in scientific collaboration networks through a gender lens. It was found that, regardless of gender, scientific performance in terms of quantity and impact plays a crucial in possessing the "social researcher" in the network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T15:15:04Z)
• Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology [0.0]
  We find significant differences in writing style by gender, with women using more involved features in their writing. Papers and patents with more involved features also tend to be cited more by women. Our findings suggest that scientific text is not devoid of personal character, which could contribute to bias in evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T22:33:36Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Assessing Gender Bias in the Information Systems Field: An Analysis of the Impact on Citations [0.0]
  This paper outlines a study to estimate the impact of scholarly citations that female IS academics accumulate vis-a-vis their male colleagues. By doing so we propose to contribute knowledge on a core dimension of gender bias in academia, which is, so far, almost completely unexplored in the IS field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T18:18:52Z)
• Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach [58.720142291102135]
  We compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group over a decade. With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Our results show that the frequency of appearance of the topics Family, Business and Women as sex objects, present an initial bias that tends to disappear over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T14:02:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.