An Evolutionary Game Model for Understanding Fraud in Consumption Taxes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04424v1
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:53:31 GMT
- Title: An Evolutionary Game Model for Understanding Fraud in Consumption Taxes
- Authors: M. Chica and J. Hernandez and C. Manrique-de-Lara-Pe\~nate and R.
Chiong
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a computational evolutionary game model to study and understand fraud dynamics in the consumption tax system.
Players are cooperators if they correctly declare their value added tax (VAT), and are defectors otherwise.
Since transactions between companies must be declared by both the buyer and seller, a strategy adopted by one influences the other's payoff.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a computational evolutionary game model to study and
understand fraud dynamics in the consumption tax system. Players are
cooperators if they correctly declare their value added tax (VAT), and are
defectors otherwise. Each player's payoff is influenced by the amount evaded
and the subjective probability of being inspected by tax authorities. Since
transactions between companies must be declared by both the buyer and seller, a
strategy adopted by one influences the other's payoff. We study the model with
a well-mixed population and different scale-free networks. Model parameters
were calibrated using real-world data of VAT declarations by businesses
registered in the Canary Islands region of Spain. We analyzed several scenarios
of audit probabilities for high and low transactions and their prevalence in
the population, as well as social rewards and penalties to find the most
efficient policy to increase the proportion of cooperators. Two major insights
were found. First, increasing the subjective audit probability for low
transactions is more efficient than increasing this probability for high
transactions. Second, favoring social rewards for cooperators or alternative
penalties for defectors can be effective policies, but their success depends on
the distribution of the audit probability for low and high transactions.
Related papers
- An Innovative Attention-based Ensemble System for Credit Card Fraud Detection [5.486205584465161]
We present a unique attention-based ensemble model for detecting credit card fraud.
The ensemble model attains an accuracy of 99.95% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T09:56:23Z) - Trustless Audits without Revealing Data or Models [49.23322187919369]
We show that it is possible to allow model providers to keep their model weights (but not architecture) and data secret while allowing other parties to trustlessly audit model and data properties.
We do this by designing a protocol called ZkAudit in which model providers publish cryptographic commitments of datasets and model weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T04:43:06Z) - Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learning [56.84263918489519]
Collaborative machine learning involves training models on data from multiple parties.
We introduce differential privacy (DP) as an incentive.
We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our approach on synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T06:28:22Z) - Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection.
A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes.
Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z) - On Imperfect Recall in Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams [57.21088266396761]
Multi-agent influence diagrams (MAIDs) are a popular game-theoretic model based on Bayesian networks.
We show how to solve MAIDs with forgetful and absent-minded agents using mixed policies and two types of correlated equilibrium.
We also describe applications of MAIDs to Markov games and team situations, where imperfect recall is often unavoidable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T07:08:34Z) - Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax
Audit Models [73.24381010980606]
This study examines issues of algorithmic fairness in the context of systems that inform tax audit selection by the IRS.
We show how the use of more flexible machine learning methods for selecting audits may affect vertical equity.
Our results have implications for the design of algorithmic tools across the public sector.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-20T16:27:06Z) - Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential
Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selection [2.2182596728059116]
We introduce a new setting, optimize-and-estimate structured bandits.
This setting is inherent to many public and private sector applications.
We demonstrate its importance on real data from the United States Internal Revenue Service.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T18:28:55Z) - Detecting Transaction-based Tax Evasion Activities on Social Media
Platforms Using Multi-modal Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
This paper presents a machine learning based Regtech tool for international tax authorities to detect transaction-based tax evasion activities on social media platforms.
The proposed model combines comments, hashtags and image modalities to produce the final output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-27T13:05:39Z) - The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax
Policies [119.07163415116686]
We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity.
We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics.
We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.