Capitol (Pat)riots: A comparative study of Twitter and Parler

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06914v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 07:46:14 GMT
• Title: Capitol (Pat)riots: A comparative study of Twitter and Parler
• Authors: Hitkul, Avinash Prabhu, Dipanwita Guhathakurta, Jivitesh jain, Mallika Subramanian, Manvith Reddy, Shradha Sehgal, Tanvi Karandikar, Amogh Gulati, Udit Arora, Rajiv Ratn Shah and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
• Abstract summary: On 6 January 2021, a mob of right-wing conservatives stormed the USA Capitol Hill interrupting the session of congress certifying 2020 Presidential election results. Immediately after the start of the event, posts related to the riots started to trend on social media. Our report presents a contrast between the trending content on Parler and Twitter around the time of riots.
• Score: 37.277566049536
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: On 6 January 2021, a mob of right-wing conservatives stormed the USA Capitol Hill interrupting the session of congress certifying 2020 Presidential election results. Immediately after the start of the event, posts related to the riots started to trend on social media. A social media platform which stood out was a free speech endorsing social media platform Parler; it is being claimed as the platform on which the riots were planned and talked about. Our report presents a contrast between the trending content on Parler and Twitter around the time of riots. We collected data from both platforms based on the trending hashtags and draw comparisons based on what are the topics being talked about, who are the people active on the platforms and how organic is the content generated on the two platforms. While the content trending on Twitter had strong resentments towards the event and called for action against rioters and inciters, Parler content had a strong conservative narrative echoing the ideas of voter fraud similar to the attacking mob. We also find a disproportionately high manipulation of traffic on Parler when compared to Twitter.

Related papers

• Political Communities on Twitter: Case Study of the 2022 French Presidential Election [14.783829037950984]
  We aim to identify political communities formed on Twitter during the 2022 French presidential election. We create a large-scale Twitter dataset containing 1.2 million users and 62.6 million tweets that mention keywords relevant to the election. We perform community detection on a retweet graph of users and propose an in-depth analysis of the stance of each community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T12:18:16Z)
• Promoting and countering misinformation during Australia's 2019-2020 bushfires: A case study of polarisation [0.11470070927586014]
  misinformation blaming arson resurfaced on Twitter during Australia's unprecedented bushfires. We study Twitter communities spreading this misinformation during the population-level event, and investigate the role of online communities and bots. We find that Supporters promoted misinformation by engaging others directly with replies and mentions using hashtags and links to external sources. We speculate that the communication strategies observed here could be discoverable in other misinformation-related discussions and could inform counter-strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T03:44:31Z)
• Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter [68.8204255655161]
  Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content. We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab. Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect. On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election [9.63004143218094]
  Persistent manipulation of social media has resulted in increased concerns regarding the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. We apply a detection model to separate factual from unreliable (or conspiratorial) claims analyzing a dataset of 242 million election-related tweets. We characterize account engagements with unreliable and conspiracy tweets, and with the QAnon conspiracy group, by political leaning and tweet types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-17T22:11:13Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• An Early Look at the Parler Online Social Network [10.683059193632943]
  Parler is an "alternative" social network promoting itself as a service that allows to "speak freely and express yourself openly" This paper presents a dataset of 183M Parler posts made by 4M users between August 2018 and January 2021, as well as metadata from 13.25M user profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T11:23:19Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.