A Comparison of Question Rewriting Methods for Conversational Passage Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07382v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:17:52 GMT
• Title: A Comparison of Question Rewriting Methods for Conversational Passage Retrieval
• Authors: Svitlana Vakulenko, Nikos Voskarides, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre
• Abstract summary: Conversational passage retrieval relies on question rewriting to modify the original question so that it no longer depends on the conversation history. Several methods for question rewriting have recently been proposed, but they were compared under different retrieval pipelines. We bridge this gap by thoroughly evaluating those question rewriting methods on the TREC CAsT 2019 and 2020 datasets under the same retrieval pipeline.
• Score: 6.490148466525755
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conversational passage retrieval relies on question rewriting to modify the original question so that it no longer depends on the conversation history. Several methods for question rewriting have recently been proposed, but they were compared under different retrieval pipelines. We bridge this gap by thoroughly evaluating those question rewriting methods on the TREC CAsT 2019 and 2020 datasets under the same retrieval pipeline. We analyze the effect of different types of question rewriting methods on retrieval performance and show that by combining question rewriting methods of different types we can achieve state-of-the-art performance on both datasets.

Related papers

• Exploring Rewriting Approaches for Different Conversational Tasks [63.56404271441824]
  The exact rewriting approach may often depend on the use case and application-specific tasks supported by the conversational assistant. We systematically investigate two different approaches, denoted as rewriting and fusion, on two fundamentally different generation tasks. Our results indicate that the specific rewriting or fusion approach highly depends on the underlying use case and generative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:05:29Z)
• Retrieve, Summarize, Plan: Advancing Multi-hop Question Answering with an Iterative Approach [6.549143816134531]
  We propose a novel iterative RAG method called ReSP, equipped with a dual-function summarizer. Experimental results on the multi-hop question-answering HotpotQA and 2WikiMultihopQA demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T02:19:00Z)
• Mixed-initiative Query Rewriting in Conversational Passage Retrieval [11.644235288057123]
  We report our methods and experiments for the TREC Conversational Assistance Track (CAsT) 2022. We propose a mixed-initiative query rewriting module, which achieves query rewriting based on the mixed-initiative interaction between the users and the system. Experiments on both TREC CAsT 2021 and TREC CAsT 2022 datasets show the effectiveness of our mixed-initiative-based query rewriting (or query reformulation) method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T19:38:40Z)
• Phrase Retrieval for Open-Domain Conversational Question Answering with Conversational Dependency Modeling via Contrastive Learning [54.55643652781891]
  Open-Domain Conversational Question Answering (ODConvQA) aims at answering questions through a multi-turn conversation. We propose a method to directly predict answers with a phrase retrieval scheme for a sequence of words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T09:46:38Z)
• LoL: A Comparative Regularization Loss over Query Reformulation Losses for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback [70.44530794897861]
  Pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) has proven to be an effective query reformulation technique to improve retrieval accuracy. Existing PRF methods independently treat revised queries originating from the same query but using different numbers of feedback documents. We propose the Loss-over-Loss (LoL) framework to compare the reformulation losses between different revisions of the same query during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T10:42:50Z)
• Joint Passage Ranking for Diverse Multi-Answer Retrieval [56.43443577137929]
  We study multi-answer retrieval, an under-explored problem that requires retrieving passages to cover multiple distinct answers for a question. This task requires joint modeling of retrieved passages, as models should not repeatedly retrieve passages containing the same answer at the cost of missing a different valid answer. In this paper, we introduce JPR, a joint passage retrieval model focusing on reranking. To model the joint probability of the retrieved passages, JPR makes use of an autoregressive reranker that selects a sequence of passages, equipped with novel training and decoding algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T04:48:36Z)
• Memory Augmented Sequential Paragraph Retrieval for Multi-hop Question Answering [32.69969157825044]
  We propose a new architecture that models paragraphs as sequential data and considers multi-hop information retrieval as a kind of sequence labeling task. We evaluate our method on both full wiki and distractor subtask of HotpotQA, a public textual multi-hop QA dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T08:15:51Z)
• Open Question Answering over Tables and Text [55.8412170633547]
  In open question answering (QA), the answer to a question is produced by retrieving and then analyzing documents that might contain answers to the question. Most open QA systems have considered only retrieving information from unstructured text. We present a new large-scale dataset Open Table-and-Text Question Answering (OTT-QA) to evaluate performance on this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T16:48:14Z)
• Query Resolution for Conversational Search with Limited Supervision [63.131221660019776]
  We propose QuReTeC (Query Resolution by Term Classification), a neural query resolution model based on bidirectional transformers. We show that QuReTeC outperforms state-of-the-art models, and furthermore, that our distant supervision method can be used to substantially reduce the amount of human-curated data required to train QuReTeC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-24T11:37:22Z)
• Multi-Stage Conversational Passage Retrieval: An Approach to Fusing Term Importance Estimation and Neural Query Rewriting [56.268862325167575]
  We tackle conversational passage retrieval (ConvPR) with query reformulation integrated into a multi-stage ad-hoc IR system. We propose two conversational query reformulation (CQR) methods: (1) term importance estimation and (2) neural query rewriting. For the former, we expand conversational queries using important terms extracted from the conversational context with frequency-based signals. For the latter, we reformulate conversational queries into natural, standalone, human-understandable queries with a pretrained sequence-tosequence model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T14:30:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.