Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11865v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:33:23 GMT
• Title: Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings
• Authors: Hancheng Cao, Chia-Jung Lee, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Priscilla Wong, Sean Rintel, Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan, Longqi Yang
• Abstract summary: In-meeting multitasking is closely linked to people's productivity and wellbeing. We present what we believe is the most comprehensive study of remote meeting multitasking behavior.
• Score: 21.069970719766214
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Virtual meetings are critical for remote work because of the need for synchronous collaboration in the absence of in-person interactions. In-meeting multitasking is closely linked to people's productivity and wellbeing. However, we currently have limited understanding of multitasking in remote meetings and its potential impact. In this paper, we present what we believe is the most comprehensive study of remote meeting multitasking behavior through an analysis of a large-scale telemetry dataset collected from February to May 2020 of U.S. Microsoft employees and a 715-person diary study. Our results demonstrate that intrinsic meeting characteristics such as size, length, time, and type, significantly correlate with the extent to which people multitask, and multitasking can lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Our findings suggest important best-practice guidelines for remote meetings (e.g., avoid important meetings in the morning) and design implications for productivity tools (e.g., support positive remote multitasking).

Related papers

• Bigger, Regularized, Categorical: High-Capacity Value Functions are Efficient Multi-Task Learners [60.75160178669076]
  We show that the use of high-capacity value models trained via cross-entropy and conditioned on learnable task embeddings addresses the problem of task interference in online reinforcement learning.<n>We test our approach on 7 multi-task benchmarks with over 280 unique tasks, spanning high degree-of-freedom humanoid control and discrete vision-based RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T06:41:45Z)
• Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task [56.92961847155029]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises when AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T13:19:48Z)
• Multitask Learning with No Regret: from Improved Confidence Bounds to Active Learning [79.07658065326592]
  Quantifying uncertainty in the estimated tasks is of pivotal importance for many downstream applications, such as online or active learning. We provide novel multitask confidence intervals in the challenging setting when neither the similarity between tasks nor the tasks' features are available to the learner. We propose a novel online learning algorithm that achieves such improved regret without knowing this parameter in advance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T13:08:09Z)
• Task Compass: Scaling Multi-task Pre-training with Task Prefix [122.49242976184617]
  Existing studies show that multi-task learning with large-scale supervised tasks suffers from negative effects across tasks. We propose a task prefix guided multi-task pre-training framework to explore the relationships among tasks. Our model can not only serve as the strong foundation backbone for a wide range of tasks but also be feasible as a probing tool for analyzing task relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T15:02:04Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Exploring the Role of Task Transferability in Large-Scale Multi-Task Learning [28.104054292437525]
  We disentangle the effect of scale and relatedness of tasks in multi-task representation learning. If the target tasks are known ahead of time, then training on a smaller set of related tasks is competitive to the large-scale multi-task training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-23T18:11:35Z)
• In Defense of the Unitary Scalarization for Deep Multi-Task Learning [121.76421174107463]
  We present a theoretical analysis suggesting that many specialized multi-tasks can be interpreted as forms of regularization. We show that, when coupled with standard regularization and stabilization techniques, unitary scalarization matches or improves upon the performance of complex multitasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T18:44:17Z)
• Patient Outcome and Zero-shot Diagnosis Prediction with Hypernetwork-guided Multitask Learning [3.392432412743858]
  Multitask deep learning has been applied to patient outcome prediction from text. Diagnose prediction among the multiple tasks has the generalizability issue due to rare diseases or unseen diagnoses. We propose a hypernetwork-based approach that generates task-conditioned parameters and coefficients of multitask prediction heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T12:52:26Z)
• LEMMA: A Multi-view Dataset for Learning Multi-agent Multi-task Activities [119.88381048477854]
  We introduce the LEMMA dataset to provide a single home to address missing dimensions with meticulously designed settings. We densely annotate the atomic-actions with human-object interactions to provide ground-truths of the compositionality, scheduling, and assignment of daily activities. We hope this effort would drive the machine vision community to examine goal-directed human activities and further study the task scheduling and assignment in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T00:13:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.