A review of motion planning algorithms for intelligent robotics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.02376v2
• Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:37:20 GMT
• Title: A review of motion planning algorithms for intelligent robotics
• Authors: Chengmin Zhou, Bingding Huang, Pasi Fr\"anti
• Abstract summary: We investigate and analyze principles of typical motion planning algorithms. Traditional planning algorithms include graph search algorithms, sampling-based algorithms, and interpolating curve algorithms. Supervised learning algorithms include MSVM, LSTM, MCTS and CNN. Policy gradient algorithms include policy gradient method, actor-critic algorithm, A3C, A2C, DPG, DDPG, TRPO and PPO.
• Score: 0.8594140167290099
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We investigate and analyze principles of typical motion planning algorithms. These include traditional planning algorithms, supervised learning, optimal value reinforcement learning, policy gradient reinforcement learning. Traditional planning algorithms we investigated include graph search algorithms, sampling-based algorithms, and interpolating curve algorithms. Supervised learning algorithms include MSVM, LSTM, MCTS and CNN. Optimal value reinforcement learning algorithms include Q learning, DQN, double DQN, dueling DQN. Policy gradient algorithms include policy gradient method, actor-critic algorithm, A3C, A2C, DPG, DDPG, TRPO and PPO. New general criteria are also introduced to evaluate performance and application of motion planning algorithms by analytical comparisons. Convergence speed and stability of optimal value and policy gradient algorithms are specially analyzed. Future directions are presented analytically according to principles and analytical comparisons of motion planning algorithms. This paper provides researchers with a clear and comprehensive understanding about advantages, disadvantages, relationships, and future of motion planning algorithms in robotics, and paves ways for better motion planning algorithms.

Related papers

• Deep Unrolling for Nonconvex Robust Principal Component Analysis [75.32013242448151]
  We design algorithms for Robust Component Analysis (A) It consists in decomposing a matrix into the sum of a low Principaled matrix and a sparse Principaled matrix.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T03:48:26Z)
• Acceleration in Policy Optimization [50.323182853069184]
  We work towards a unifying paradigm for accelerating policy optimization methods in reinforcement learning (RL) by integrating foresight in the policy improvement step via optimistic and adaptive updates. We define optimism as predictive modelling of the future behavior of a policy, and adaptivity as taking immediate and anticipatory corrective actions to mitigate errors from overshooting predictions or delayed responses to change. We design an optimistic policy gradient algorithm, adaptive via meta-gradient learning, and empirically highlight several design choices pertaining to acceleration, in an illustrative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T15:50:57Z)
• Stochastic Ratios Tracking Algorithm for Large Scale Machine Learning Problems [0.7614628596146599]
  We propose a novel algorithm for adaptive step length selection in the classical SGD framework. Under reasonable conditions, the algorithm produces step lengths in line with well-established theoretical requirements. We show that the algorithm can generate step lengths comparable to the best step length obtained from manual tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T06:22:11Z)
• Representation Learning with Multi-Step Inverse Kinematics: An Efficient and Optimal Approach to Rich-Observation RL [106.82295532402335]
  Existing reinforcement learning algorithms suffer from computational intractability, strong statistical assumptions, and suboptimal sample complexity. We provide the first computationally efficient algorithm that attains rate-optimal sample complexity with respect to the desired accuracy level. Our algorithm, MusIK, combines systematic exploration with representation learning based on multi-step inverse kinematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T14:51:47Z)
• Goal Agnostic Planning using Maximum Likelihood Paths in Hypergraph World Models [1.370633147306388]
  We present a hypergraph-based machine learning algorithm, a datastructure--driven maintenance method, and a planning algorithm based on a probabilistic application of Dijkstra's algorithm. We prove that the algorithm determines optimal solutions within the problem space, mathematically bound learning performance, and supply a mathematical model analyzing system state progression through time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T16:22:33Z)
• Identifying Co-Adaptation of Algorithmic and Implementational Innovations in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy and Case Study of Inference-based Algorithms [15.338931971492288]
  We focus on a series of inference-based actor-critic algorithms to decouple their algorithmic innovations and implementation decisions. We identify substantial performance drops whenever implementation details are mismatched for algorithmic choices. Results show which implementation details are co-adapted and co-evolved with algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T17:55:20Z)
• A Two-stage Framework and Reinforcement Learning-based Optimization Algorithms for Complex Scheduling Problems [54.61091936472494]
  We develop a two-stage framework, in which reinforcement learning (RL) and traditional operations research (OR) algorithms are combined together. The scheduling problem is solved in two stages, including a finite Markov decision process (MDP) and a mixed-integer programming process, respectively. Results show that the proposed algorithms could stably and efficiently obtain satisfactory scheduling schemes for agile Earth observation satellite scheduling problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T03:16:12Z)
• Safe Learning and Optimization Techniques: Towards a Survey of the State of the Art [3.6954802719347413]
  Safe learning and optimization deals with learning and optimization problems that avoid, as much as possible, the evaluation of non-safe input points. A comprehensive survey of safe reinforcement learning algorithms was published in 2015, but related works in active learning and in optimization were not considered. This paper reviews those algorithms from a number of domains including reinforcement learning, Gaussian process regression and classification, evolutionary algorithms, and active learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-23T13:58:09Z)
• Evolving Reinforcement Learning Algorithms [186.62294652057062]
  We propose a method for meta-learning reinforcement learning algorithms. The learned algorithms are domain-agnostic and can generalize to new environments not seen during training. We highlight two learned algorithms which obtain good generalization performance over other classical control tasks, gridworld type tasks, and Atari games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T18:55:07Z)
• Run2Survive: A Decision-theoretic Approach to Algorithm Selection based on Survival Analysis [75.64261155172856]
  survival analysis (SA) naturally supports censored data and offers appropriate ways to use such data for learning distributional models of algorithm runtime. We leverage such models as a basis of a sophisticated decision-theoretic approach to algorithm selection, which we dub Run2Survive. In an extensive experimental study with the standard benchmark ASlib, our approach is shown to be highly competitive and in many cases even superior to state-of-the-art AS approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T15:20:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.