Identifying Co-Adaptation of Algorithmic and Implementational Innovations in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy and Case Study of Inference-based Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.17258v1
• Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:55:20 GMT
• Title: Identifying Co-Adaptation of Algorithmic and Implementational Innovations in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy and Case Study of Inference-based Algorithms
• Authors: Hiroki Furuta, Tadashi Kozuno, Tatsuya Matsushima, Yutaka Matsuo, Shixiang Shane Gu
• Abstract summary: We focus on a series of inference-based actor-critic algorithms to decouple their algorithmic innovations and implementation decisions. We identify substantial performance drops whenever implementation details are mismatched for algorithmic choices. Results show which implementation details are co-adapted and co-evolved with algorithms.
• Score: 15.338931971492288
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently many algorithms were devised for reinforcement learning (RL) with function approximation. While they have clear algorithmic distinctions, they also have many implementation differences that are algorithm-agnostic and sometimes subtle. Such mixing of algorithmic novelty and implementation craftsmanship makes rigorous analyses of the sources of performance improvements difficult. In this work, we focus on a series of inference-based actor-critic algorithms -- MPO, AWR, and SAC -- to decouple their algorithmic innovations and implementation decisions. We present unified derivations through a single control-as-inference objective, where we can categorize each algorithm as based on either Expectation-Maximization (EM) or direct Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence minimization and treat the rest of specifications as implementation details. We performed extensive ablation studies, and identified substantial performance drops whenever implementation details are mismatched for algorithmic choices. These results show which implementation details are co-adapted and co-evolved with algorithms, and which are transferable across algorithms: as examples, we identified that tanh policy and network sizes are highly adapted to algorithmic types, while layer normalization and ELU are critical for MPO's performances but also transfer to noticeable gains in SAC. We hope our work can inspire future work to further demystify sources of performance improvements across multiple algorithms and allow researchers to build on one another's both algorithmic and implementational innovations.

Related papers

• On the Design and Analysis of LLM-Based Algorithms [74.7126776018275]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used as sub-routines in algorithms. LLMs have achieved remarkable empirical success. Our proposed framework holds promise for advancing LLM-based algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T07:39:07Z)
• Dual Algorithmic Reasoning [9.701208207491879]
  We propose to learn algorithms by exploiting duality of the underlying algorithmic problem. We demonstrate that simultaneously learning the dual definition of these optimisation problems in algorithmic learning allows for better learning. We then validate the real-world utility of our dual algorithmic reasoner by deploying it on a challenging brain vessel classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T08:46:23Z)
• Improved Algorithms for Neural Active Learning [74.89097665112621]
  We improve the theoretical and empirical performance of neural-network(NN)-based active learning algorithms for the non-parametric streaming setting. We introduce two regret metrics by minimizing the population loss that are more suitable in active learning than the one used in state-of-the-art (SOTA) related work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T05:03:38Z)
• The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark [28.789225199559834]
  Learning representations of algorithms is an emerging area of machine learning, seeking to bridge concepts from neural networks with classical algorithms. We propose the CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark, covering classical algorithms from the Introduction to Algorithms textbook. Our benchmark spans a variety of algorithmic reasoning procedures, including sorting, searching, dynamic programming, graph algorithms, string algorithms and geometric algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T09:56:44Z)
• A Pragmatic Look at Deep Imitation Learning [0.3626013617212666]
  We re-implement 6 different adversarial imitation learning algorithms. We evaluate them on a widely-used expert trajectory dataset. GAIL consistently performs well across a range of sample sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T06:33:10Z)
• Provably Faster Algorithms for Bilevel Optimization [54.83583213812667]
  Bilevel optimization has been widely applied in many important machine learning applications. We propose two new algorithms for bilevel optimization. We show that both algorithms achieve the complexity of $mathcalO(epsilon-1.5)$, which outperforms all existing algorithms by the order of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T21:05:30Z)
• A Two-stage Framework and Reinforcement Learning-based Optimization Algorithms for Complex Scheduling Problems [54.61091936472494]
  We develop a two-stage framework, in which reinforcement learning (RL) and traditional operations research (OR) algorithms are combined together. The scheduling problem is solved in two stages, including a finite Markov decision process (MDP) and a mixed-integer programming process, respectively. Results show that the proposed algorithms could stably and efficiently obtain satisfactory scheduling schemes for agile Earth observation satellite scheduling problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T03:16:12Z)
• Benchmarking Simulation-Based Inference [5.3898004059026325]
  Recent advances in probabilistic modelling have led to a large number of simulation-based inference algorithms which do not require numerical evaluation of likelihoods. We provide a benchmark with inference tasks and suitable performance metrics, with an initial selection of algorithms. We found that the choice of performance metric is critical, that even state-of-the-art algorithms have substantial room for improvement, and that sequential estimation improves sample efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T18:31:22Z)
• Evolving Reinforcement Learning Algorithms [186.62294652057062]
  We propose a method for meta-learning reinforcement learning algorithms. The learned algorithms are domain-agnostic and can generalize to new environments not seen during training. We highlight two learned algorithms which obtain good generalization performance over other classical control tasks, gridworld type tasks, and Atari games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T18:55:07Z)
• A Brief Look at Generalization in Visual Meta-Reinforcement Learning [56.50123642237106]
  We evaluate the generalization performance of meta-reinforcement learning algorithms. We find that these algorithms can display strong overfitting when they are evaluated on challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T15:17:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.