Rihanna versus Bollywood: Twitter Influencers and the Indian Farmers'
Protest
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04031v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:08:36 GMT
- Title: Rihanna versus Bollywood: Twitter Influencers and the Indian Farmers'
Protest
- Authors: Dibyendu Mishra, Syeda Zainab Akbar, Arshia Arya, Saloni Dash, Rynaa
Grover, Joyojeet Pal
- Abstract summary: We use data from Twitter and an archive of debunked misinformation stories to understand some of the patterns around influencer engagement with a political issue.
We find that more followed influencers were less likely to come out in support of the tweet.
We also find that the later engagement of major influencers on the side of the government's position shows suggestion's of collusion.
- Score: 3.059929492766848
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: A tweet from popular entertainer and businesswoman, Rihanna, bringing
attention to farmers' protests around Delhi set off heightened activity on
Indian social media. An immediate consequence was the weighing in by Indian
politicians, entertainers, media and other influencers on the issue. In this
paper, we use data from Twitter and an archive of debunked misinformation
stories to understand some of the patterns around influencer engagement with a
political issue. We found that more followed influencers were less likely to
come out in support of the tweet. We also find that the later engagement of
major influencers on the side of the government's position shows suggestion's
of collusion. Irrespective of their position on the issue, influencers who
engaged saw a significant rise in their following after their tweets. While a
number of tweets thanked Rihanna for raising awareness on the issue, she was
systematically trolled on the grounds of her gender, race, nationality and
religion. Finally, we observed how misinformation existing prior to the tweet
set up the grounds for alternative narratives that emerged.
Related papers
- Uncovering Gender Bias within Journalist-Politician Interaction in
Indian Twitter [7.964711577522729]
We curated a gender-balanced set of 100 most-followed Indian journalists on Twitter and 100 most-followed politicians.
We collected 21,188 unique tweets posted by these journalists that mentioned these politicians.
Our analysis revealed that there is a significant gender bias -- the frequency with which journalists mention male politicians vs. how frequently they mention female politicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-29T05:41:53Z) - Covid-19 Public Sentiment Analysis for Indian Tweets Classification [0.0]
We show how Twitter data has been extracted and then run sentimental analysis queries on it.
This is helpful to analyze the information in the tweets where opinions are highly unstructured, heterogeneous, and are either positive or negative or neutral in some cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T09:29:55Z) - Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this.
We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API.
Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z) - Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs.
Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts.
We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily.
First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets.
Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z) - Negativity Spreads Faster: A Large-Scale Multilingual Twitter Analysis
on the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication [7.136205674624813]
This paper attempts to analyse tweets of politicians from three European countries.
By utilising state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we performed sentiment analysis on hundreds of thousands of tweets.
Our analysis indicates that politicians' negatively charged tweets spread more widely, especially in more recent times.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-01T13:25:19Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Divided We Rule: Influencer Polarization on Twitter During Political
Crises in India [5.861653129876749]
We use Google's Universal Sentence (USE) to encode the tweets of 6k influencers and 26k Indian politicians during political crises in India.
We obtain aggregate vector representations of the influencers based on their tweet embeddings.
We find that while on COVID-19 there is a confluence of influencers on the side of the government, on three other contentious issues around citizenship, Kashmir's statehood, and farmers' protests, it is mainly government-aligned fan accounts that amplify the incumbent's positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T08:38:16Z) - Analyzing Twitter Users' Behavior Before and After Contact by the
Internet Research Agency [0.771871917860264]
Russian-backed Internet Research Agency has been identified as a key source of misinformation spread on Twitter prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
We compare the before and after behavior of contacted users to determine whether there were differences in their mean tweet count, the sentiment of their tweets, and the frequency and sentiment of tweets mentioning @realDonaldTrump or @HillaryClinton.
Our results indicate that users overall exhibited statistically significant changes in behavior across most of these metrics, and that those users that engaged with the IRA generally showed greater changes in behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-04T02:04:17Z) - Russian trolls speaking Russian: Regional Twitter operations and MH17 [68.8204255655161]
In 2018, Twitter released data on accounts identified as Russian trolls.
We analyze the Russian-language operations of these trolls.
We find that trolls' information campaign on the MH17 crash was the largest in terms of tweet count.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T19:48:12Z) - #MeToo on Campus: Studying College Sexual Assault at Scale Using Data
Reported on Social Media [71.74529365205053]
We analyze the influence of the # trend on a pool of college followers.
The results show that the majority of topics embedded in those # tweets detail sexual harassment stories.
There exists a significant correlation between the prevalence of this trend and official reports on several major geographical regions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-16T18:05:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.