Uncovering Gender Bias within Journalist-Politician Interaction in
Indian Twitter
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18911v1
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 05:41:53 GMT
- Title: Uncovering Gender Bias within Journalist-Politician Interaction in
Indian Twitter
- Authors: Brisha Jain, Mainack Mondal
- Abstract summary: We curated a gender-balanced set of 100 most-followed Indian journalists on Twitter and 100 most-followed politicians.
We collected 21,188 unique tweets posted by these journalists that mentioned these politicians.
Our analysis revealed that there is a significant gender bias -- the frequency with which journalists mention male politicians vs. how frequently they mention female politicians.
- Score: 7.964711577522729
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Gender bias in political discourse is a significant problem on today's social
media. Previous studies found that the gender of politicians indeed influences
the content directed towards them by the general public. However, these works
are particularly focused on the global north, which represents individualistic
culture. Furthermore, they did not address whether there is gender bias even
within the interaction between popular journalists and politicians in the
global south. These understudied journalist-politician interactions are
important (more so in collectivistic cultures like the global south) as they
can significantly affect public sentiment and help set gender-biased social
norms. In this work, using large-scale data from Indian Twitter we address this
research gap.
We curated a gender-balanced set of 100 most-followed Indian journalists on
Twitter and 100 most-followed politicians. Then we collected 21,188 unique
tweets posted by these journalists that mentioned these politicians. Our
analysis revealed that there is a significant gender bias -- the frequency with
which journalists mention male politicians vs. how frequently they mention
female politicians is statistically significantly different ($p<<0.05$). In
fact, median tweets from female journalists mentioning female politicians
received ten times fewer likes than median tweets from female journalists
mentioning male politicians. However, when we analyzed tweet content, our
emotion score analysis and topic modeling analysis did not reveal any
significant gender-based difference within the journalists' tweets towards
politicians. Finally, we found a potential reason for the significant gender
bias: the number of popular male Indian politicians is almost twice as large as
the number of popular female Indian politicians, which might have resulted in
the observed bias. We conclude by discussing the implications of this work.
Related papers
- Invisible Women in Digital Diplomacy: A Multidimensional Framework for
Online Gender Bias Against Women Ambassadors Worldwide [39.73063909189058]
This paper offers the first global analysis of the treatment of women diplomats on social media.
It focuses on three critical elements: gendered language, negativity in tweets directed at diplomats, and the visibility of women diplomats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T13:39:58Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Gender stereotypes in the mediated personalization of politics:
Empirical evidence from a lexical, syntactic and sentiment analysis [2.7071541526963805]
We show that the political personalization in Italy is more detrimental for women than men.
Women politicians are covered with a more negative tone than their men counterpart when personal details are reported.
The major contribution to the observed gender differences comes from online news rather than print news.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T11:40:44Z) - Negativity Spreads Faster: A Large-Scale Multilingual Twitter Analysis
on the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication [7.136205674624813]
This paper attempts to analyse tweets of politicians from three European countries.
By utilising state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we performed sentiment analysis on hundreds of thousands of tweets.
Our analysis indicates that politicians' negatively charged tweets spread more widely, especially in more recent times.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-01T13:25:19Z) - Quantifying Gender Biases Towards Politicians on Reddit [19.396806939258806]
Despite attempts to increase gender parity in politics, global efforts have struggled to ensure equal female representation.
This is likely tied to implicit gender biases against women in authority.
We present a comprehensive study of gender biases that appear in online political discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-22T16:39:14Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: Analysis of Female and Male Users on
Twitter [8.651122862855495]
Current literature mainly focuses on analyzing the content of tweets without considering the gender of users.
This research collects and analyzes a large number of tweets posted during the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Our findings are based upon a wide range of topics, such as tax, climate change, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-21T01:31:03Z) - Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language
Models [104.41668491794974]
We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender.
We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z) - #MeToo on Campus: Studying College Sexual Assault at Scale Using Data
Reported on Social Media [71.74529365205053]
We analyze the influence of the # trend on a pool of college followers.
The results show that the majority of topics embedded in those # tweets detail sexual harassment stories.
There exists a significant correlation between the prevalence of this trend and official reports on several major geographical regions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-16T18:05:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.