AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Risks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04255v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:54:20 GMT
• Title: AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Risks
• Authors: McKane Andrus, Sarah Dean, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Nathan Lambert, Tom Zick
• Abstract summary: We track the emergence of sociotechnical inquiry in three distinct subfields of AI research: AI Safety, Fair Machine Learning (Fair ML) and Human-in-the-Loop (HIL) Autonomy. We show that for each subfield, perceptions of Public Interest Technology (PIT) stem from the particular dangers faced by past integration of technical systems within a normative social order. We present a roadmap for a unified approach to sociotechnical graduate pedagogy in AI.
• Score: 2.765897573789737
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite interest in communicating ethical problems and social contexts within the undergraduate curriculum to advance Public Interest Technology (PIT) goals, interventions at the graduate level remain largely unexplored. This may be due to the conflicting ways through which distinct Artificial Intelligence (AI) research tracks conceive of their interface with social contexts. In this paper we track the historical emergence of sociotechnical inquiry in three distinct subfields of AI research: AI Safety, Fair Machine Learning (Fair ML) and Human-in-the-Loop (HIL) Autonomy. We show that for each subfield, perceptions of PIT stem from the particular dangers faced by past integration of technical systems within a normative social order. We further interrogate how these histories dictate the response of each subfield to conceptual traps, as defined in the Science and Technology Studies literature. Finally, through a comparative analysis of these currently siloed fields, we present a roadmap for a unified approach to sociotechnical graduate pedagogy in AI.

Related papers

• Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
  Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal. We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z)
• Incentive Compatibility for AI Alignment in Sociotechnical Systems: Positions and Prospects [11.086872298007835]
  Existing methodologies primarily focus on technical facets, often neglecting the intricate sociotechnical nature of AI systems. We posit a new problem worth exploring: Incentive Compatibility Sociotechnical Alignment Problem (ICSAP) We discuss three classical game problems for achieving IC: mechanism design, contract theory, and Bayesian persuasion, in addressing the perspectives, potentials, and challenges of solving ICSAP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T10:52:57Z)
• From Algorithm Worship to the Art of Human Learning: Insights from 50-year journey of AI in Education [0.0]
  Current discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) oscillates between hope and apprehension. This paper delves into the complexities of AI's role in Education, addressing the mixed messages that have both enthused and alarmed educators. It explores the promises that AI holds for enhancing learning through personalisation at scale, against the backdrop of concerns about ethical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T16:12:14Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research [3.0215443986383734]
  We propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development. The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T16:49:04Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.