Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive
error correction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06132v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:11:20 GMT
- Title: Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive
error correction
- Authors: Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya, Alexander N. Korotkov,
Andrew Dunsworth, Daniel Sank, Chris Quintana, Matt McEwen, Rami Barends,
Paul V. Klimov, Sabrina Hong, Cody Jones, Andre Petukhov, Dvir Kafri, Sean
Demura, Brian Burkett, Craig Gidney, Austin G. Fowler, Harald Putterman, Igor
Aleiner, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Andreas
Bengtsson, Alexandre Bourassa, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A.
Buell, Nicholas Bushnell, Benjamin Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney,
Alan R. Derk, Daniel Eppens, Catherine Erickson, Edward Farhi, Brooks Foxen,
Marissa Giustina, Jonathan A. Gross, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean D. Harrington,
Jeremy Hilton, Alan Ho, Trent Huang, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, Sergei
V. Isakov, Evan Jeffrey, Zhang Jiang, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Seon Kim, Fedor
Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, Erik Lucero, Orion Martin, Jarrod R.
McClean, Trevor McCourt, Xiao Mi, Kevin C. Miao, Masoud Mohseni, Wojciech
Mruczkiewicz, Josh Mutus, Ofer Naaman, Matthew Neeley, Charles Neill, Michael
Newman, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O'Brien, Alex Opremcak, Eric Ostby,
B\'alint Pat\'o, Nicholas Redd, Pedram Roushan, Nicholas C. Rubin, Vladimir
Shvarts, Doug Strain, Marco Szalay, Matthew D. Trevithick, Benjamin
Villalonga, Theodore White, Z. Jamie Yao, Ping Yeh, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut
Neven, Sergio Boixo, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Yu Chen, Anthony Megrant, Julian
Kelly
- Abstract summary: State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$.
Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits.
We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
- Score: 56.362599585843085
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving
sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in
the $10^{-15}$ regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have
physical error rates near $10^{-3}$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to
bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many
physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors
are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows,
provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also
requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many
rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges.
Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting
qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors,
reducing logical error per round by more than $100\times$ when increasing the
number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over
50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error
correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a
device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection
using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that
the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a
simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that
superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum
computing.
Related papers
- Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold [107.92016014248976]
Quantum error correction provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit.
We present two surface code memories operating below a critical threshold: a distance-7 code and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder.
Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-24T23:08:50Z) - Transforming qubits via quasi-geometric approaches [0.0]
We develop a theory to transform a small number of qubits into a larger number of error-correcting qubits.
We use the 2-dimensional quasi-orthogonal complete complementary codes (2D-QOCCCSs) and quasi-cyclic asymmetric quantum error-correcting codes (AQECCs) via quasigroup and group theory properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T11:41:26Z) - Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates [0.0]
We present experiments on a trapped-ion QCCD processor where, through the use of fault-tolerant encoding and error correction, we are able to suppress logical error rates to levels below the physical error rates.
Results signify an important transition from noisy intermediate scale quantum computing to reliable quantum computing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T20:14:13Z) - Fast Flux-Activated Leakage Reduction for Superconducting Quantum
Circuits [84.60542868688235]
leakage out of the computational subspace arising from the multi-level structure of qubit implementations.
We present a resource-efficient universal leakage reduction unit for superconducting qubits using parametric flux modulation.
We demonstrate that using the leakage reduction unit in repeated weight-two stabilizer measurements reduces the total number of detected errors in a scalable fashion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T16:21:32Z) - Overcoming leakage in scalable quantum error correction [128.39402546769284]
Leakage of quantum information out of computational states into higher energy states represents a major challenge in the pursuit of quantum error correction (QEC)
Here, we demonstrate the execution of a distance-3 surface code and distance-21 bit-flip code on a Sycamore quantum processor where leakage is removed from all qubits in each cycle.
We report a ten-fold reduction in steady-state leakage population on the data qubits encoding the logical state and an average leakage population of less than $1 times 10-3$ throughout the entire device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T07:54:35Z) - Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit [147.2624260358795]
We report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across multiple code sizes.
Our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number.
Results mark the first experimental demonstration where quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-13T18:00:02Z) - Realizing Repeated Quantum Error Correction in a Distance-Three Surface
Code [42.394110572265376]
We demonstrate quantum error correction using the surface code, which is known for its exceptionally high tolerance to errors.
In an error correction cycle taking only $1.1,mu$s, we demonstrate the preservation of four cardinal states of the logical qubit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T13:58:44Z) - Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum
error correction [1.8397027011844889]
Quantum computing can become scalable through error correction, but logical error rates only decrease with system size when physical errors are sufficiently uncorrelated.
Here, we report a reset protocol that returns a qubit to the ground state from all relevant higher level states.
We find lower rates of logical errors and an improved scaling and stability of error suppression with increasing qubit number.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T17:11:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.