Related papers: How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum

How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06516v1
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:39:00 GMT
Title: How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum
Authors: Lisa Oswald, Jonathan Bright
Abstract summary: We study the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit. We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community. Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum.
Score: 0.0
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Does engagement with opposing views help break down ideological `echo chambers'; or does it backfire and reinforce them? This question remains critical as academics, policymakers and activists grapple with the question of how to regulate political discussion on social media. In this study, we contribute to the debate by examining the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit. A large sample of posts (N = 3000) was manually coded as either dissonant or consonant which allowed the automated classification of the full dataset of more than 50,000 posts, with codes inferred from linked websites. We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community: they received more attention (comments) than consonant submissions, even though they received lower scores through up-voting and down-voting. Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum. Consistent with identity theory, confrontation with opposing views triggered activity in the forum, particularly among users that are highly engaged with the community. In light of the findings, theory of social identity and echo chambers is discussed and enhanced.

Related papers

Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit [4.871559706146398]
We investigate how users change their community engagement after receiving a cross-party reply in the U.S. politics discussion on Reddit. We find that receiving a cross-party reply to a comment in a non-partisan discussion space is not significantly associated with increased out-party subreddit activity. Our results reveal a highly conditional depolarization effect following cross-party interactions in spurring activity in out-party communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T11:12:52Z)
Understanding Online Discussion Across Difference: Insights from Gun Discourse on Reddit [41.40699123305595]
We study discussions of gun policy on Reddit, with the overarching goal of developing insights into the potential of the internet to support understanding across difference. We find that the discussion of gun politics falls into three groups: conservative pro-gun, liberal pro-gun, and liberal anti-gun. While our subjects state that they would be willing to engage with others across the ideological divide, in practice they rarely do.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-06T02:36:27Z)
"Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 Science [50.08057052734799]
We estimate scientific consensus based on samples of abstracts from preprint servers. We find that anti-consensus posts and users, though overall less numerous than pro-consensus ones, are vastly over-represented on Twitter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T06:16:57Z)
Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
On the Relation Between Opinion Change and Information Consumption on Reddit [22.387666772159974]
We study the relationship between one user's opinion change episode and subsequent behavioral change on an online social media, Reddit. We find that people who report an opinion change are significantly more likely to change their future participation in a specific subset of online communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-25T13:34:16Z)
Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion Communities [8.680081568962997]
This paper characterizes self-disclosures of dissonance about QAnon, a conspiracy theory initiated by a mysterious leader Q. We focus on 2K posts from two image boards, 4chan and 8chan, and 1.2 M comments and posts from 12 subreddits dedicated to QAnon. We find that self-disclosures of dissonance correlate with a significant decrease in user contributions and ultimately with their departure from the community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-21T16:49:21Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.