Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14388v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 22:17:07 GMT
• Title: Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit
• Authors: Alexandros Efstratiou, Jeremy Blackburn, Tristan Caulfield, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou, Emiliano De Cristofaro
• Abstract summary: We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
• Score: 66.09950457847242
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Previous research has documented the existence of both online echo chambers and hostile intergroup interactions. In this paper, we explore the relationship between these two phenomena by studying the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We examine whether users who are more engaged in echo chambers are more hostile when they comment on other communities. We then create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other, whether echo chamber-like engagement with these communities is associated with polarization, and on the communities' political leanings. We observe both the echo chamber and hostile intergroup interaction phenomena, but neither holds universally across communities. Contrary to popular belief, we find that polarizing and toxic speech is more dominant between communities on the same, rather than opposing, sides of the political spectrum, especially on the left; however, this mainly points to the collective targeting of political outgroups.

Related papers

• Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit [4.871559706146398]
  We investigate how users change their community engagement after receiving a cross-party reply in the U.S. politics discussion on Reddit. We find that receiving a cross-party reply to a comment in a non-partisan discussion space is not significantly associated with increased out-party subreddit activity. Our results reveal a highly conditional depolarization effect following cross-party interactions in spurring activity in out-party communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T11:12:52Z)
• Echo-chambers and Idea Labs: Communication Styles on Twitter [51.13560635563004]
  This paper investigates the communication styles and structures of Twitter (X) communities within the vaccination context. By shedding light on the nuanced nature of communication within social networks, this study emphasizes the significance of understanding the diversity of perspectives within online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T13:55:51Z)
• Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users [0.0]
  We show that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T19:39:07Z)
• Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
  We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Are Anti-Feminist Communities Gateways to the Far Right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTube [12.723777984461693]
  "The Manosphere," a conglomerate of men-centered online communities, may serve as a gateway to far right movements. This paper quantitatively studies the migratory patterns between a variety of groups within the Manosphere and the Alt-right. Our results suggest that there is a large overlap between the user bases of the Alt-right and of the Manosphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T13:22:27Z)
• How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum [0.0]
  We study the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit. We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community. Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T13:39:00Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.