Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04923v1
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 11:12:52 GMT
- Title: Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit
- Authors: Yan Xia, Corrado Monti, Barbara Keller, Mikko Kivelä,
- Abstract summary: We investigate how users change their community engagement after receiving a cross-party reply in the U.S. politics discussion on Reddit.
We find that receiving a cross-party reply to a comment in a non-partisan discussion space is not significantly associated with increased out-party subreddit activity.
Our results reveal a highly conditional depolarization effect following cross-party interactions in spurring activity in out-party communities.
- Score: 4.871559706146398
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: It has been a widely shared concern that social media reinforces echo chambers of like-minded users and exacerbate political polarization. While fostering interactions across party lines is recognized as an important strategy to break echo chambers, there is a lack of empirical evidence on whether users will actually become more integrated or instead more segregated following such interactions on real social media platforms. We fill this gap by inspecting how users change their community engagement after receiving a cross-party reply in the U.S. politics discussion on Reddit. More specifically, we investigate if they increase their activity in communities of the opposing party, or in communities of their own party. We find that receiving a cross-party reply to a comment in a non-partisan discussion space is not significantly associated with increased out-party subreddit activity, unless the comment itself is already a reply to another comment. Meanwhile, receiving a cross-party reply is significantly associated with increased in-party subreddit activity, but the effect is comparable to that of receiving a same-party reply. Our results reveal a highly conditional depolarization effect following cross-party interactions in spurring activity in out-party communities, which is likely part of a more general dynamic of feedback-boosted engagement.
Related papers
- Hatemongers ride on echo chambers to escalate hate speech diffusion [23.714548893849393]
We analyze more than 32 million posts from over 6.8 million users across three popular online social networks.
We find that hatemongers play a more crucial role in governing the spread of information compared to singled-out hateful content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-05T20:30:48Z) - Understanding Online Migration Decisions Following the Banning of
Radical Communities [0.2752817022620644]
We study how factors associated with the RECRO radicalization framework relate to users' migration decisions.
Our results show that individual-level factors, those relating to the behavior of users, are associated with the decision to post on the fringe platform.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-09T10:43:15Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Spillover of Antisocial Behavior from Fringe Platforms: The Unintended
Consequences of Community Banning [0.2752817022620644]
We show that participating in fringe communities on Reddit increases users' toxicity and involvement with subreddits similar to the banned community.
In short, we find evidence for a spillover of antisocial behavior from fringe platforms onto Reddit via co-participation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-20T15:48:27Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding
mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum [0.0]
We study the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit.
We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community.
Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T13:39:00Z) - Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to
misinformation [71.46564239895892]
We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter.
We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.