ELIXIR: Learning from User Feedback on Explanations to Improve
Recommender Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09388v1
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:43:49 GMT
- Title: ELIXIR: Learning from User Feedback on Explanations to Improve
Recommender Models
- Authors: Azin Ghazimatin, Soumajit Pramanik, Rishiraj Saha Roy, Gerhard Weikum
- Abstract summary: We devise a human-in-the-loop framework, called ELIXIR, where user feedback on explanations is leveraged for pairwise learning of user preferences.
ELIXIR leverages feedback on pairs of recommendations and explanations to learn user-specific latent preference vectors.
Our framework is instantiated using generalized graph recommendation via Random Walk with Restart.
- Score: 26.11434743591804
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: System-provided explanations for recommendations are an important component
towards transparent and trustworthy AI. In state-of-the-art research, this is a
one-way signal, though, to improve user acceptance. In this paper, we turn the
role of explanations around and investigate how they can contribute to
enhancing the quality of generated recommendations themselves. We devise a
human-in-the-loop framework, called ELIXIR, where user feedback on explanations
is leveraged for pairwise learning of user preferences. ELIXIR leverages
feedback on pairs of recommendations and explanations to learn user-specific
latent preference vectors, overcoming sparseness by label propagation with
item-similarity-based neighborhoods. Our framework is instantiated using
generalized graph recommendation via Random Walk with Restart. Insightful
experiments with a real user study show significant improvements in movie and
book recommendations over item-level feedback.
Related papers
- Learning from Negative User Feedback and Measuring Responsiveness for
Sequential Recommenders [13.762960304406016]
We introduce explicit and implicit negative user feedback into the training objective of sequential recommenders.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach using live experiments on a large-scale industrial recommender system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T17:16:07Z) - Explainable Recommender with Geometric Information Bottleneck [25.703872435370585]
We propose to incorporate a geometric prior learnt from user-item interactions into a variational network.
Latent factors from an individual user-item pair can be used for both recommendation and explanation generation.
Experimental results on three e-commerce datasets show that our model significantly improves the interpretability of a variational recommender.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-09T10:38:36Z) - Editable User Profiles for Controllable Text Recommendation [66.00743968792275]
We propose LACE, a novel concept value bottleneck model for controllable text recommendations.
LACE represents each user with a succinct set of human-readable concepts.
It learns personalized representations of the concepts based on user documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-09T14:52:18Z) - Reinforced Path Reasoning for Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation [10.36395995374108]
We propose a novel Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation (CERec) to generate item attribute-based counterfactual explanations.
We reduce the huge search space with an adaptive path sampler by using rich context information of a given knowledge graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T05:59:58Z) - Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior.
We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference.
We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z) - Improving Sequential Query Recommendation with Immediate User Feedback [6.925738064847176]
We propose an algorithm for next query recommendation in interactive data exploration settings.
We conduct a large-scale experimental study using log files from a popular online literature discovery service.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-12T18:19:24Z) - Simulating Bandit Learning from User Feedback for Extractive Question
Answering [51.97943858898579]
We study learning from user feedback for extractive question answering by simulating feedback using supervised data.
We show that systems initially trained on a small number of examples can dramatically improve given feedback from users on model-predicted answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-18T17:47:58Z) - Learning to Learn a Cold-start Sequential Recommender [70.5692886883067]
The cold-start recommendation is an urgent problem in contemporary online applications.
We propose a meta-learning based cold-start sequential recommendation framework called metaCSR.
metaCSR holds the ability to learn the common patterns from regular users' behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T08:11:24Z) - Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups.
We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users.
We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z) - Interacting with Explanations through Critiquing [40.69540222716043]
We present a technique that learns to generate personalized explanations of recommendations from review texts.
We show that human users significantly prefer these explanations over those produced by state-of-the-art techniques.
Our work's most important innovation is that it allows users to react to a recommendation by critiquing the textual explanation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-22T09:03:06Z) - Reward Constrained Interactive Recommendation with Natural Language
Feedback [158.8095688415973]
We propose a novel constraint-augmented reinforcement learning (RL) framework to efficiently incorporate user preferences over time.
Specifically, we leverage a discriminator to detect recommendations violating user historical preference.
Our proposed framework is general and is further extended to the task of constrained text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-04T16:23:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.