Dados Abertos Governamentais no contexto de Pol\'iticas P\'ublicas de Sa\'ude e Sistemas Prisionais: Realidade ou Utopia?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00541v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:48:01 GMT
• Title: Dados Abertos Governamentais no contexto de Pol\'iticas P\'ublicas de Sa\'ude e Sistemas Prisionais: Realidade ou Utopia?
• Abstract summary: The literature has reported a minimal set of criteria to categorize a specific data repository as open. The analyzed repositories focus on public health and prison systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There are many initiatives of transparency reported in the access and use of government open data for different purposes. This practice reveals an important requirement to accomplish the participatory governance. The literature has reported a minimal set of criteria to categorize a specific data repository as open. This paper discusses to which extent specific national and international data repositories address these criteria. The analyzed repositories focus on public health and prison systems. The results show different levels of alignment to the criteria and provide evidence that the adoption of government open data practices are a reality. On the other hand, there is still a long way to achieve full alignment to the stated criteria.

Related papers

• Triangulating Across U.S. Federal AI Transparency Regimes [6.739177252343933]
  This paper examines three existing U.S. federal transparency regimes.<n>It asks how well they, individually and together, describe government AI use.<n>We find that no single regime fully reveals how the government constructs or deploys AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T15:36:34Z)
• Jurisdiction as Structural Barrier: How Privacy Policy Organization May Reduce Visibility of Substantive Disclosures [0.0]
  We identify a structural pattern we call jurisdiction-siloed disclosure.<n>Data practices affecting all users should appear in the main policy body.<n>Regulators could operationalize this through the FTC's "clear and conspicuous" standard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T17:29:59Z)
• Failing on Bias Mitigation: Investigating Why Predictive Models Struggle with Government Data [3.2794063354054965]
  The potential for bias and unfairness in AI-supporting government services raises ethical and legal concerns.<n>Using crime rate prediction with the Bristol City Council data as a case study, we examine how these issues persist.<n>Our findings reveal that bias mitigation approaches applied to government data are not always effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T13:29:43Z)
• Governance by Evidence: Regulated Predictors in Decision-Tree Models [0.0]
  We use published decision-tree papers as a proxy for real-world use of legally governed data.<n>We compile a corpus of decision-tree studies and assign each reported predictor to a regulated data category.<n>We find that many reported predictors fall into regulated categories, with the largest shares in healthcare and clear differences across industries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T20:39:49Z)
• Measuring What Matters: The AI Pluralism Index [0.0]
  We present the AI Pluralism Index (AIPI), a transparent, evidence-based instrument that evaluates producers and system families across four pillars: participatory governance, inclusivity and diversity, transparency, and accountability.<n>The index aims to steer incentives toward pluralistic practice and to equip policymakers, procurers, and the public with comparable evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T13:19:34Z)
• Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness [48.96399034594329]
  This paper characterizes the impact of Differential Privacy on bias and unfairness in the context of releasing information about networks. We consider a network release problem where the network structure is known to all, but the weights on edges must be released privately. Our work provides theoretical foundations and empirical evidence into the bias and unfairness arising due to privacy in these networked decision problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T08:37:37Z)
• Lomas: A Platform for Confidential Analysis of Private Data [0.0]
  Lomas is a novel open-source platform designed to realize the full potential of the data held by public administrations. It enables authorized users, such as approved researchers and government analysts, to execute algorithms on confidential datasets. Lomas executes these algorithms without revealing the data to the user and returns the results protected by Differential Privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T19:16:58Z)
• Legally Binding but Unfair? Towards Assessing Fairness of Privacy Policies [0.0]
  Privacy policies are expected to inform data subjects about their data protection rights and explain data management practices. This implies that a privacy policy is written in a fair way, e.g., it does not use polarizing terms, does not require a certain education, or does not assume a particular social background. We identify from fundamental legal sources and fairness research, how the dimensions informational fairness, representational fairness and ethics / morality are related to privacy policies. We propose options to automatically assess policies in these fairness dimensions, based on text statistics, linguistic methods and artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T22:53:32Z)
• The Impact of Differential Feature Under-reporting on Algorithmic Fairness [86.275300739926]
  We present an analytically tractable model of differential feature under-reporting. We then use to characterize the impact of this kind of data bias on algorithmic fairness. Our results show that, in real world data settings, under-reporting typically leads to increasing disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T19:16:22Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Classification in the Domain of Public Affairs [65.9077733300329]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to greatly enhance the analysis of public affairs documents. LLMs can be of great use to process domain-specific documents, such as those in the domain of public affairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:35:01Z)
• Packaging code for reproducible research in the public sector [0.0]
  jtstats project consists of R and Python packages for importing, processing, and visualising large and complex datasets. Jtstats shows how domain specific packages can enable reproducible research within the public sector and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T16:07:24Z)
• Practices and challenges in clinical data sharing [0.0]
  This paper identifies current directions, challenges and best practices in constructing a clinical data-sharing framework for research purposes. The purpose is to devise best practices for the implementation of an effective, safe and transparent research access framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T19:40:33Z)
• Mapping and Comparing Data Governance Frameworks: A benchmarking exercise to inform global data governance deliberations [0.0]
  Article explores the increasing importance of global data governance due to the rapid growth of data and the need for responsible data use and protection. The report highlights the need for a more holistic, coordinated approach to data governance to manage the global flow of data responsibly and for the public interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T12:56:25Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Far [68.45921483094705]
  Data-driven algorithms are studied in diverse domains to support critical decisions, directly impacting people's well-being. A growing community of researchers has been investigating the equity of existing algorithms and proposing novel ones, advancing the understanding of risks and opportunities of automated decision-making for historically disadvantaged populations. Progress in fair Machine Learning hinges on data, which can be appropriately used only if adequately documented. Unfortunately, the algorithmic fairness community suffers from a collective data documentation debt caused by a lack of information on specific resources (opacity) and scatteredness of available information (sparsity)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:25:46Z)
• Post-processing of Differentially Private Data: A Fairness Perspective [53.29035917495491]
  This paper shows that post-processing causes disparate impacts on individuals or groups. It analyzes two critical settings: the release of differentially private datasets and the use of such private datasets for downstream decisions. It proposes a novel post-processing mechanism that is (approximately) optimal under different fairness metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T02:45:03Z)
• Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
  In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.