Conversational Norms for Human-Robot Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01706v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:28:18 GMT
• Title: Conversational Norms for Human-Robot Dialogues
• Authors: Maitreyee Tewari, Thomas Hellstr\"om, Suna Bensch
• Abstract summary: This paper describes a recently initiated research project aiming at supporting development of computerised dialogue systems that handle breaches of conversational norms. Our approach is to model dialogue and norms with co-operating distributed grammar systems (CDGSs)
• Score: 0.32228025627337864
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper describes a recently initiated research project aiming at supporting development of computerised dialogue systems that handle breaches of conversational norms such as the Gricean maxims, which describe how dialogue participants ideally form their utterances in order to be informative, relevant, brief, etc. Our approach is to model dialogue and norms with co-operating distributed grammar systems (CDGSs), and to develop methods to detect breaches and to handle them in dialogue systems for verbal human-robot interaction.

Related papers

• Human-Robot Dialogue Annotation for Multi-Modal Common Ground [4.665414514091581]
  We describe the development of symbolic representations annotated on human-robot dialogue data to make dimensions of meaning accessible to autonomous systems participating in collaborative, natural language dialogue, and to enable common ground with human partners. A particular challenge for establishing common ground arises in remote dialogue, where a human and robot are engaged in a joint navigation and exploration task of an unfamiliar environment, but where the robot cannot immediately share high quality visual information due to limited communication constraints. Within this paradigm, we capture propositional semantics and the illocutionary force of a single utterance within the dialogue through our Dialogue-AMR annotation, an augmentation of Abstract Meaning Representation
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T19:33:54Z)
• Unsupervised Extraction of Dialogue Policies from Conversations [3.102576158218633]
  We show how Large Language Models can be instrumental in extracting dialogue policies from datasets. We then propose a novel method for generating dialogue policies utilizing a controllable and interpretable graph-based methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T14:57:25Z)
• Towards a Neural Era in Dialogue Management for Collaboration: A Literature Survey [0.0]
  Survey begins by reviewing the evolution of dialogue management paradigms in collaborative dialogue systems. It then shifts focus to contemporary data-driven dialogue management techniques. Paper proceeds to analyze a selected set of recent works that apply neural approaches to collaborative dialogue management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T07:20:43Z)
• Controllable Mixed-Initiative Dialogue Generation through Prompting [50.03458333265885]
  Mixed-initiative dialogue tasks involve repeated exchanges of information and conversational control. Agents gain control by generating responses that follow particular dialogue intents or strategies, prescribed by a policy planner. Standard approach has been fine-tuning pre-trained language models to perform generation conditioned on these intents. We instead prompt large language models as a drop-in replacement to fine-tuning on conditional generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T23:11:25Z)
• GODEL: Large-Scale Pre-Training for Goal-Directed Dialog [119.1397031992088]
  We introduce GODEL, a large pre-trained language model for dialog. We show that GODEL outperforms state-of-the-art pre-trained dialog models in few-shot fine-tuning setups. A novel feature of our evaluation methodology is the introduction of a notion of utility that assesses the usefulness of responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T18:19:32Z)
• Target-Guided Dialogue Response Generation Using Commonsense and Data Augmentation [32.764356638437214]
  We introduce a new technique for target-guided response generation. We also propose techniques to re-purpose existing dialogue datasets for target-guided generation. Our work generally enables dialogue system designers to exercise more control over the conversations that their systems produce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T04:01:40Z)
• Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
  Training machines to understand natural language and interact with humans is an elusive and essential task of artificial intelligence. This paper reviews the previous methods from the technical perspective of dialogue modeling for the dialogue comprehension task. In addition, we categorize dialogue-related pre-training techniques which are employed to enhance PrLMs in dialogue scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T03:52:37Z)
• "How Robust r u?": Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems on Spoken Conversations [87.95711406978157]
  This work presents a new benchmark on spoken task-oriented conversations. We study multi-domain dialogue state tracking and knowledge-grounded dialogue modeling. Our data set enables speech-based benchmarking of task-oriented dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T04:51:04Z)
• Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
  We review the previous methods from the perspective of dialogue modeling. We discuss three typical patterns of dialogue modeling that are widely-used in dialogue comprehension tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T15:50:17Z)
• Controlling Dialogue Generation with Semantic Exemplars [55.460082747572734]
  We present an Exemplar-based Dialogue Generation model, EDGE, that uses the semantic frames present in exemplar responses to guide generation. We show that controlling dialogue generation based on the semantic frames of exemplars, rather than words in the exemplar itself, improves the coherence of generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:02:37Z)
• Discourse Coherence, Reference Grounding and Goal Oriented Dialogue [15.766916122461922]
  We argue for a new approach to realizing mixed-initiative human--computer referential communication. We describe a simple dialogue system in a referential communication domain that accumulates constraints across discourse, interprets them using a learned probabilistic model, and plans clarification using reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T20:53:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.