Abolitionist Networks: Modeling Language Change in Nineteenth-Century Activist Newspapers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07538v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:26:30 GMT
• Title: Abolitionist Networks: Modeling Language Change in Nineteenth-Century Activist Newspapers
• Authors: Sandeep Soni and Lauren Klein and Jacob Eisenstein
• Abstract summary: Two newspapers edited by women -- THE PROVINCIAL FREEMAN and THE LILY -- led a large number of semantic changes in our corpus. This paper supplements recent qualitative work on the role of women in abolition's vanguard.
• Score: 14.98054985758998
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The abolitionist movement of the nineteenth-century United States remains among the most significant social and political movements in US history. Abolitionist newspapers played a crucial role in spreading information and shaping public opinion around a range of issues relating to the abolition of slavery. These newspapers also serve as a primary source of information about the movement for scholars today, resulting in powerful new accounts of the movement and its leaders. This paper supplements recent qualitative work on the role of women in abolition's vanguard, as well as the role of the Black press, with a quantitative text modeling approach. Using diachronic word embeddings, we identify which newspapers tended to lead lexical semantic innovations -- the introduction of new usages of specific words -- and which newspapers tended to follow. We then aggregate the evidence across hundreds of changes into a weighted network with the newspapers as nodes; directed edge weights represent the frequency with which each newspaper led the other in the adoption of a lexical semantic change. Analysis of this network reveals pathways of lexical semantic influence, distinguishing leaders from followers, as well as others who stood apart from the semantic changes that swept through this period. More specifically, we find that two newspapers edited by women -- THE PROVINCIAL FREEMAN and THE LILY -- led a large number of semantic changes in our corpus, lending additional credence to the argument that a multiracial coalition of women led the abolitionist movement in terms of both thought and action. It also contributes additional complexity to the scholarship that has sought to tease apart the relation of the abolitionist movement to the women's suffrage movement, and the vexed racial politics that characterized their relation.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [73.25935570218375]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language. We uncover notable diversity in the ideological stance exhibited across different LLMs and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• Narratives of Collective Action in YouTube's Discourse on Veganism [0.0]
  We use natural language processing to operationalize a theoretical framework of moral narratives specific to the vegan movement. Our analysis reveals that several narrative types, as defined by the theory, are empirically present in the data. Video narratives advocating social fight, whether through protest or through efforts to convert others to the cause, are associated with a stronger sense of collective action in the respective comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T13:44:36Z)
• Moral consensus and divergence in partisan language use [0.0]
  Polarization has increased substantially in political discourse, contributing to a widening partisan divide. We analyzed large-scale, real-world language use in Reddit communities and in news outlets to uncover psychological dimensions along which partisan language is divided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T16:50:26Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Exploring Gender-Based Toxic Speech on Twitter in Context of the #MeToo movement: A Mixed Methods Approach [2.454909090258064]
  The # movement has catalyzed widespread public discourse surrounding sexual harassment and assault, empowering survivors to share their stories and holding perpetrators accountable. While the movement has had a substantial and largely positive influence, this study aims to examine the potential negative consequences in the form of increased hostility against women and men on the social media platform Twitter. By analyzing tweets shared between October 2017 and January 2020 by more than 47.1k individuals who had either disclosed their own sexual abuse experiences on Twitter or engaged in discussions about the movement, we identify the overall increase in gender-based hostility towards both women and men since the start of the movement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T20:45:12Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Gender stereotypes in the mediated personalization of politics: Empirical evidence from a lexical, syntactic and sentiment analysis [2.7071541526963805]
  We show that the political personalization in Italy is more detrimental for women than men. Women politicians are covered with a more negative tone than their men counterpart when personal details are reported. The major contribution to the observed gender differences comes from online news rather than print news.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T11:40:44Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement [17.672730162091526]
  The # movement on Twitter has drawn attention to the pervasive nature of sexual harassment and violence. We examine online # conversations across gender and racial/ethnic identities. We find that tweets authored by white women were overrepresented in the movement compared to other demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T15:25:33Z)
• Towards Debiasing Sentence Representations [109.70181221796469]
  We show that Sent-Debias is effective in removing biases, and at the same time, preserves performance on sentence-level downstream tasks. We hope that our work will inspire future research on characterizing and removing social biases from widely adopted sentence representations for fairer NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T04:22:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.