Gender stereotypes in the mediated personalization of politics: Empirical evidence from a lexical, syntactic and sentiment analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03083v1
• Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:40:44 GMT
• Title: Gender stereotypes in the mediated personalization of politics: Empirical evidence from a lexical, syntactic and sentiment analysis
• Authors: Emanuele Brugnoli, Rosaria Simone, Marco Delmastro
• Abstract summary: We show that the political personalization in Italy is more detrimental for women than men. Women politicians are covered with a more negative tone than their men counterpart when personal details are reported. The major contribution to the observed gender differences comes from online news rather than print news.
• Score: 2.7071541526963805
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The media attention to the personal sphere of famous and important individuals has become a key element of the gender narrative. Here we combine lexical, syntactic and sentiment analysis to investigate the role of gender in the personalization of a wide range of political office holders in Italy during the period 2017-2020. On the basis of a score for words that is introduced to account for gender unbalance in both representative and news coverage, we show that the political personalization in Italy is more detrimental for women than men, with the persistence of entrenched stereotypes including a masculine connotation of leadership, the resulting women's unsuitability to hold political functions, and a greater deal of focus on their attractiveness and body parts. In addition, women politicians are covered with a more negative tone than their men counterpart when personal details are reported. Further, the major contribution to the observed gender differences comes from online news rather than print news, suggesting that the expression of certain stereotypes may be better conveyed when click baiting and personal targeting have a major impact.

Related papers

• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• A Multilingual Perspective on Probing Gender Bias [0.0]
  Gender bias is a form of systematic negative treatment that targets individuals based on their gender. This thesis investigates the nuances of how gender bias is expressed through language and within language technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T21:35:21Z)
• Uncovering Gender Bias within Journalist-Politician Interaction in Indian Twitter [7.964711577522729]
  We curated a gender-balanced set of 100 most-followed Indian journalists on Twitter and 100 most-followed politicians. We collected 21,188 unique tweets posted by these journalists that mentioned these politicians. Our analysis revealed that there is a significant gender bias -- the frequency with which journalists mention male politicians vs. how frequently they mention female politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T05:41:53Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• A Moral- and Event- Centric Inspection of Gender Bias in Fairy Tales at A Large Scale [50.92540580640479]
  We computationally analyze gender bias in a fairy tale dataset containing 624 fairy tales from 7 different cultures. We find that the number of male characters is two times that of female characters, showing a disproportionate gender representation. Female characters turn out more associated with care-, loyalty- and sanctity- related moral words, while male characters are more associated with fairness- and authority- related moral words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T19:38:09Z)
• Quantifying Gender Biases Towards Politicians on Reddit [19.396806939258806]
  Despite attempts to increase gender parity in politics, global efforts have struggled to ensure equal female representation. This is likely tied to implicit gender biases against women in authority. We present a comprehensive study of gender biases that appear in online political discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T16:39:14Z)
• Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Models [104.41668491794974]
  We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender. We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z)
• Language, communication and society: a gender based linguistics analysis [0.0]
  The purpose of this study is to find evidence for supporting the hypothesis that language is the mirror of our thinking. The answers have been analysed to see if gender stereotypes were present such as the attribution of psychological and behavioural characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T08:38:37Z)
• Uncovering Gender Bias in Media Coverage of Politicians with Machine Learning [3.0839245814393723]
  This paper presents research uncovering systematic gender bias in the representation of political leaders in the media, using artificial intelligence. Newspaper coverage of Irish ministers over a fifteen year period was gathered and analysed with natural language processing techniques and machine learning. Findings demonstrate evidence of gender bias in the portrayal of female politicians, the kind of policies they were associated with and how they were evaluated in terms of their performance as political leaders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T18:37:56Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.