Conceptual capacity and effective complexity of neural networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07614v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:32:59 GMT
• Title: Conceptual capacity and effective complexity of neural networks
• Authors: Lech Szymanski, Brendan McCane, Craig Atkinson
• Abstract summary: We propose a complexity measure of a neural network mapping function based on the diversity of the set of tangent spaces from different inputs. Treating each tangent space as a linear PAC concept we use an entropy-based measure of the bundle of concepts in order to estimate the conceptual capacity of the network.
• Score: 0.7734726150561086
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose a complexity measure of a neural network mapping function based on the diversity of the set of tangent spaces from different inputs. Treating each tangent space as a linear PAC concept we use an entropy-based measure of the bundle of concepts in order to estimate the conceptual capacity of the network. The theoretical maximal capacity of a ReLU network is equivalent to the number of its neurons. In practice however, due to correlations between neuron activities within the network, the actual capacity can be remarkably small, even for very big networks. Empirical evaluations show that this new measure is correlated with the complexity of the mapping function and thus the generalisation capabilities of the corresponding network. It captures the effective, as oppose to the theoretical, complexity of the network function. We also showcase some uses of the proposed measure for analysis and comparison of trained neural network models.

Related papers

• Universal Approximation Theorem for Vector- and Hypercomplex-Valued Neural Networks [0.3686808512438362]
  The universal approximation theorem states that a neural network with one hidden layer can approximate continuous functions on compact sets. It is valid for real-valued neural networks and some hypercomplex-valued neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T13:56:13Z)
• Addressing caveats of neural persistence with deep graph persistence [54.424983583720675]
  We find that the variance of network weights and spatial concentration of large weights are the main factors that impact neural persistence. We propose an extension of the filtration underlying neural persistence to the whole neural network instead of single layers. This yields our deep graph persistence measure, which implicitly incorporates persistent paths through the network and alleviates variance-related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T13:34:11Z)
• Exploring the Complexity of Deep Neural Networks through Functional Equivalence [1.3597551064547502]
  We present a novel bound on the covering number for deep neural networks, which reveals that the complexity of neural networks can be reduced. We demonstrate that functional equivalence benefits optimization, as over parameterized networks tend to be easier to train since increasing network width leads to a diminishing volume of the effective parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T04:01:27Z)
• Generalization and Estimation Error Bounds for Model-based Neural Networks [78.88759757988761]
  We show that the generalization abilities of model-based networks for sparse recovery outperform those of regular ReLU networks. We derive practical design rules that allow to construct model-based networks with guaranteed high generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T16:39:44Z)
• On the Approximation and Complexity of Deep Neural Networks to Invariant Functions [0.0]
  We study the approximation and complexity of deep neural networks to invariant functions. We show that a broad range of invariant functions can be approximated by various types of neural network models. We provide a feasible application that connects the parameter estimation and forecasting of high-resolution signals with our theoretical conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T09:19:19Z)
• Quasi-orthogonality and intrinsic dimensions as measures of learning and generalisation [55.80128181112308]
  We show that dimensionality and quasi-orthogonality of neural networks' feature space may jointly serve as network's performance discriminants. Our findings suggest important relationships between the networks' final performance and properties of their randomly initialised feature spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T21:47:32Z)
• Towards Understanding Theoretical Advantages of Complex-Reaction Networks [77.34726150561087]
  We show that a class of functions can be approximated by a complex-reaction network using the number of parameters. For empirical risk minimization, our theoretical result shows that the critical point set of complex-reaction networks is a proper subset of that of real-valued networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-15T10:13:49Z)
• Optimal Approximation with Sparse Neural Networks and Applications [0.0]
  We use deep sparsely connected neural networks to measure the complexity of a function class in $L(mathbb Rd)$. We also introduce representation system - a countable collection of functions to guide neural networks. We then analyse the complexity of a class called $beta$ cartoon-like functions using rate-distortion theory and wedgelets construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-14T05:14:13Z)
• Deep Kronecker neural networks: A general framework for neural networks with adaptive activation functions [4.932130498861987]
  We propose a new type of neural networks, Kronecker neural networks (KNNs), that form a general framework for neural networks with adaptive activation functions. Under suitable conditions, KNNs induce a faster decay of the loss than that by the feed-forward networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T04:54:57Z)
• Learning Connectivity of Neural Networks from a Topological Perspective [80.35103711638548]
  We propose a topological perspective to represent a network into a complete graph for analysis. By assigning learnable parameters to the edges which reflect the magnitude of connections, the learning process can be performed in a differentiable manner. This learning process is compatible with existing networks and owns adaptability to larger search spaces and different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T04:53:31Z)
• Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods [53.808840694241]
  We advance the understanding of the relations between the network's architecture and its generalizability from the compression perspective. We propose a series of intuitive, data-dependent and easily-measurable properties that tightly characterize the compressibility and generalizability of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T22:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.