Ensemble Inference Methods for Models With Noisy and Expensive
Likelihoods
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03384v1
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:29:18 GMT
- Title: Ensemble Inference Methods for Models With Noisy and Expensive
Likelihoods
- Abstract summary: This paper is concerned with the use of interacting particle systems for the solution of inverse problems for parameters.
The available forward model evaluations are subject to rapid fluctuations, in parameter space, superimposed on the smoothly varying large scale parametric structure of interest.
Multiscale analysis is used to study the behaviour of interacting particle system algorithms when such rapid fluctuations, which we refer to as noise, pollute the large scale parametric dependence of the parameter-to-data map.
- Score: 3.856620400071431
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The increasing availability of data presents an opportunity to calibrate
unknown parameters which appear in complex models of phenomena in the
biomedical, physical and social sciences. However, model complexity often leads
to parameter-to-data maps which are expensive to evaluate and are only
available through noisy approximations. This paper is concerned with the use of
interacting particle systems for the solution of the resulting inverse problems
for parameters. Of particular interest is the case where the available forward
model evaluations are subject to rapid fluctuations, in parameter space,
superimposed on the smoothly varying large scale parametric structure of
interest. Multiscale analysis is used to study the behaviour of interacting
particle system algorithms when such rapid fluctuations, which we refer to as
noise, pollute the large scale parametric dependence of the parameter-to-data
map. Ensemble Kalman methods (which are derivative-free) and Langevin-based
methods (which use the derivative of the parameter-to-data map) are compared in
this light. The ensemble Kalman methods are shown to behave favourably in the
presence of noise in the parameter-to-data map, whereas Langevin methods are
adversely affected. On the other hand, Langevin methods have the correct
equilibrium distribution in the setting of noise-free forward models, whilst
ensemble Kalman methods only provide an uncontrolled approximation, except in
the linear case. Therefore a new class of algorithms, ensemble Gaussian process
samplers, which combine the benefits of both ensemble Kalman and Langevin
methods, are introduced and shown to perform favourably.
Related papers
- Efficient Covariance Estimation for Sparsified Functional Data [51.69796254617083]
proposed Random-knots (Random-knots-Spatial) and B-spline (Bspline-Spatial) estimators of the covariance function are computationally efficient.<n>Asymptotic pointwise of the covariance are obtained for sparsified individual trajectories under some regularity conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T00:50:33Z) - The Ensemble Kalman Inversion Race [0.0]
Ensemble Kalman methods were initially developed to solve nonlinear data assimilation problems in oceanography.<n>We focus on learning climate model parameters from minimizing the misfit between modeled and observed climate statistics.<n>Given the many variants of ensemble methods proposed, an important question is: Which ensemble Kalman method should be used for climate model calibration?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-19T20:18:40Z) - Trans-dimensional Hamiltonian model selection and parameter estimation from sparse, noisy data [0.0]
High-limited characterization often requires estimating parameters and model dimension from experimental data of limited quantity and quality.<n>This ill-posed regime may render traditional machine learning and deterministic methods unreliable or intractable.<n>We present a Bayesian framework that hybridizes several Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling techniques to estimate both parameters and model dimension from sparse, noisy data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T16:07:20Z) - Efficient Deconvolution in Populational Inverse Problems [6.1048542188987085]
This work is focussed on the inversion task of inferring the distribution over parameters of interest leading to multiple sets of observations.<n>The potential to solve such distributional inversion problems is driven by increasing availability of data, but a major roadblock is blind deconvolution.<n>We propose a methodology leveraging large data sets of observations, collected from different instantiations of the same physical processes, to simultaneously deconvolve the data corrupting noise distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T11:25:46Z) - Fast data inversion for high-dimensional dynamical systems from noisy measurements [10.060455365145106]
We develop a scalable approach for a flexible latent factor model for high-dimensional dynamical systems.
By applying our method to geodetic measurements in the Cascadia region, our estimated slip better agrees with independently measured seismic data of tremor events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T16:25:57Z) - Efficient Prior Calibration From Indirect Data [5.588334720483076]
This paper is concerned with learning the prior model from data, in particular, learning the prior from multiple realizations of indirect data obtained through the noisy observation process.
An efficient residual-based neural operator approximation of the forward model is proposed and it is shown that this may be learned concurrently with the pushforward map.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T08:34:41Z) - Gaussian process regression and conditional Karhunen-Lo\'{e}ve models
for data assimilation in inverse problems [68.8204255655161]
We present a model inversion algorithm, CKLEMAP, for data assimilation and parameter estimation in partial differential equation models.
The CKLEMAP method provides better scalability compared to the standard MAP method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T18:14:12Z) - Learning to Bound Counterfactual Inference in Structural Causal Models
from Observational and Randomised Data [64.96984404868411]
We derive a likelihood characterisation for the overall data that leads us to extend a previous EM-based algorithm.
The new algorithm learns to approximate the (unidentifiability) region of model parameters from such mixed data sources.
It delivers interval approximations to counterfactual results, which collapse to points in the identifiable case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-06T12:42:11Z) - On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning [79.6302606855302]
Currently, many research works propose to only fine-tune a small portion of the parameters while keeping most of the parameters shared across different tasks.
We show that all of the methods are actually sparse fine-tuned models and conduct a novel theoretical analysis of them.
Despite the effectiveness of sparsity grounded by our theory, it still remains an open problem of how to choose the tunable parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-28T17:41:48Z) - History-Based, Bayesian, Closure for Stochastic Parameterization:
Application to Lorenz '96 [0.09137554315375918]
We develop a new type of parameterization based on a Bayesian formalism for neural networks, to account for uncertainty quantification.
We apply the proposed Bayesian history-based parameterization to the Lorenz '96 model in the presence of noisy and sparse data.
This approach paves the way for the use of Bayesian approaches for closure problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T05:22:50Z) - A Causality-Based Learning Approach for Discovering the Underlying
Dynamics of Complex Systems from Partial Observations with Stochastic
Parameterization [1.2882319878552302]
This paper develops a new iterative learning algorithm for complex turbulent systems with partial observations.
It alternates between identifying model structures, recovering unobserved variables, and estimating parameters.
Numerical experiments show that the new algorithm succeeds in identifying the model structure and providing suitable parameterizations for many complex nonlinear systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T00:35:03Z) - Nonparametric learning of kernels in nonlocal operators [6.314604944530131]
We provide a rigorous identifiability analysis and convergence study for the learning of kernels in nonlocal operators.
We propose a nonparametric regression algorithm with a novel data adaptive RKHS Tikhonov regularization method based on the function space of identifiability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T02:47:55Z) - Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian
Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models.
One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z) - MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood
Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice.
One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio.
We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z) - Sparse Algorithms for Markovian Gaussian Processes [18.999495374836584]
Sparse Markovian processes combine the use of inducing variables with efficient Kalman filter-likes recursion.
We derive a general site-based approach to approximate the non-Gaussian likelihood with local Gaussian terms, called sites.
Our approach results in a suite of novel sparse extensions to algorithms from both the machine learning and signal processing, including variational inference, expectation propagation, and the classical nonlinear Kalman smoothers.
The derived methods are suited to literature-temporal data, where the model has separate inducing points in both time and space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T09:50:53Z) - Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method.
A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations.
We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.