What Makes an Effective Scalarising Function for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04790v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:18:58 GMT
• Title: What Makes an Effective Scalarising Function for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation?
• Authors: Clym Stock-Williams, Tinkle Chugh, Alma Rahat, Wei Yu
• Abstract summary: Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation by scalarising the objectives avoids the computation of expensive integral-based acquisition functions. The effectiveness of all the methodological improvements defined here is demonstrated on a real-world problem.
• Score: 6.4239565988811425
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Performing multi-objective Bayesian optimisation by scalarising the objectives avoids the computation of expensive multi-dimensional integral-based acquisition functions, instead of allowing one-dimensional standard acquisition functions\textemdash such as Expected Improvement\textemdash to be applied. Here, two infill criteria based on hypervolume improvement\textemdash one recently introduced and one novel\textemdash are compared with the multi-surrogate Expected Hypervolume Improvement. The reasons for the disparities in these methods' effectiveness in maximising the hypervolume of the acquired Pareto Front are investigated. In addition, the effect of the surrogate model mean function on exploration and exploitation is examined: careful choice of data normalisation is shown to be preferable to the exploration parameter commonly used with the Expected Improvement acquisition function. Finally, the effectiveness of all the methodological improvements defined here is demonstrated on a real-world problem: the optimisation of a wind turbine blade aerofoil for both aerodynamic performance and structural stiffness. With effective scalarisation, Bayesian optimisation finds a large number of new aerofoil shapes that strongly dominate standard designs.

Related papers

• Trajectory-Based Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization for Model Retraining [8.598456741786801]
  We present a novel trajectory-based multi-objective Bayesian optimization algorithm. Our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art multi-objectives in both locating better trade-offs and tuning efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T07:43:45Z)
• Advancements in Optimization: Adaptive Differential Evolution with Diversification Strategy [0.0]
  The study employs single-objective optimization in a two-dimensional space and runs ADEDS on each of the benchmark functions with multiple iterations. ADEDS consistently outperforms standard DE for a variety of optimization challenges, including functions with numerous local optima, plate-shaped, valley-shaped, stretched-shaped, and noisy functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T10:05:41Z)
• Consensus-Adaptive RANSAC [104.87576373187426]
  We propose a new RANSAC framework that learns to explore the parameter space by considering the residuals seen so far via a novel attention layer. The attention mechanism operates on a batch of point-to-model residuals, and updates a per-point estimation state to take into account the consensus found through a lightweight one-step transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T08:25:46Z)
• E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuning [55.50908600818483]
  Fine-tuning large-scale pretrained vision models for new tasks has become increasingly parameter-intensive. We propose an Effective and Efficient Visual Prompt Tuning (E2VPT) approach for large-scale transformer-based model adaptation. Our approach outperforms several state-of-the-art baselines on two benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T19:03:21Z)
• Agent-based Collaborative Random Search for Hyper-parameter Tuning and Global Function Optimization [0.0]
  This paper proposes an agent-based collaborative technique for finding near-optimal values for any arbitrary set of hyper- parameters in a machine learning model. The behavior of the presented model, specifically against the changes in its design parameters, is investigated in both machine learning and global function optimization applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T21:10:17Z)
• Scalable Bayesian optimization with high-dimensional outputs using randomized prior networks [3.0468934705223774]
  We propose a deep learning framework for BO and sequential decision making based on bootstrapped ensembles of neural architectures with randomized priors. We show that the proposed framework can approximate functional relationships between design variables and quantities of interest, even in cases where the latter take values in high-dimensional vector spaces or even infinite-dimensional function spaces. We test the proposed framework against state-of-the-art methods for BO and demonstrate superior performance across several challenging tasks with high-dimensional outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:55:21Z)
• Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
  We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory. We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures. We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z)
• Surrogate modeling for Bayesian optimization beyond a single Gaussian process [62.294228304646516]
  We propose a novel Bayesian surrogate model to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space. To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model. To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T16:43:10Z)
• Towards Learning Universal Hyperparameter Optimizers with Transformers [57.35920571605559]
  We introduce the OptFormer, the first text-based Transformer HPO framework that provides a universal end-to-end interface for jointly learning policy and function prediction. Our experiments demonstrate that the OptFormer can imitate at least 7 different HPO algorithms, which can be further improved via its function uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T12:51:32Z)
• Automatically Learning Compact Quality-aware Surrogates for Optimization Problems [55.94450542785096]
  Solving optimization problems with unknown parameters requires learning a predictive model to predict the values of the unknown parameters and then solving the problem using these values. Recent work has shown that including the optimization problem as a layer in a complex training model pipeline results in predictions of iteration of unobserved decision making. We show that we can improve solution quality by learning a low-dimensional surrogate model of a large optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:11:54Z)
• Composition of kernel and acquisition functions for High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization [0.1749935196721634]
  We use the addition-ality of the objective function into mapping both the kernel and the acquisition function of the Bayesian Optimization. This ap-proach makes more efficient the learning/updating of the probabilistic surrogate model. Results are presented for real-life application, that is the control of pumps in urban water distribution systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:45:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.