Out-of-distribution detection in satellite image classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05442v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:11:52 GMT
• Title: Out-of-distribution detection in satellite image classification
• Authors: Jakob Gawlikowski, Sudipan Saha, Anna Kruspe, Xiao Xiang Zhu
• Abstract summary: In satellite image analysis, distributional mismatch may arise due to unseen classes in the test data and differences in the geographic area. Deep learning based models may behave in unexpected manner when subjected to test data that has such distributional shifts from the training data. We adopt a Dirichlet Prior Network based model to quantify distributional uncertainty of deep learning models for remote sensing.
• Score: 11.479629320025671
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In satellite image analysis, distributional mismatch between the training and test data may arise due to several reasons, including unseen classes in the test data and differences in the geographic area. Deep learning based models may behave in unexpected manner when subjected to test data that has such distributional shifts from the training data, also called out-of-distribution (OOD) examples. Predictive uncertainly analysis is an emerging research topic which has not been explored much in context of satellite image analysis. Towards this, we adopt a Dirichlet Prior Network based model to quantify distributional uncertainty of deep learning models for remote sensing. The approach seeks to maximize the representation gap between the in-domain and OOD examples for a better identification of unknown examples at test time. Experimental results on three exemplary test scenarios show the efficacy of the model in satellite image analysis.

Related papers

• Downstream-Pretext Domain Knowledge Traceback for Active Learning [138.02530777915362]
  We propose a downstream-pretext domain knowledge traceback (DOKT) method that traces the data interactions of downstream knowledge and pre-training guidance. DOKT consists of a traceback diversity indicator and a domain-based uncertainty estimator. Experiments conducted on ten datasets show that our model outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T01:34:13Z)
• Detecting Out-Of-Distribution Earth Observation Images with Diffusion Models [2.1178416840822027]
  We show that the reconstruction error of diffusion models can effectively serve as unsupervised out-of-distribution detectors for remote sensing images. We introduce ODEED, a novel reconstruction-based scorer using the probability-flow ODE of diffusion models. We aim to pave the way towards better use of generative models for anomaly detection in remote sensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T07:07:36Z)
• The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes [30.30769701138665]
  We introduce and explore the Mirrored Influence Hypothesis, highlighting a reciprocal nature of influence between training and test data. Specifically, it suggests that evaluating the influence of training data on test predictions can be reformulated as an equivalent, yet inverse problem. We introduce a new method for estimating the influence of training data, which requires calculating gradients for specific test samples, paired with a forward pass for each training point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:43:05Z)
• On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
  Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach. We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset. We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z)
• A Novel Explainable Out-of-Distribution Detection Approach for Spiking Neural Networks [6.100274095771616]
  This work presents a novel OoD detector that can identify whether test examples input to a Spiking Neural Network belong to the distribution of the data over which it was trained. We characterize the internal activations of the hidden layers of the network in the form of spike count patterns. A local explanation method is devised to produce attribution maps revealing which parts of the input instance push most towards the detection of an example as an OoD sample.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T11:16:35Z)
• Analyzing the Effects of Handling Data Imbalance on Learned Features from Medical Images by Looking Into the Models [50.537859423741644]
  Training a model on an imbalanced dataset can introduce unique challenges to the learning problem. We look deeper into the internal units of neural networks to observe how handling data imbalance affects the learned features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T09:38:38Z)
• Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets [53.34152466646884]
  In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. We demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T04:54:06Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Bayesian Imaging With Data-Driven Priors Encoded by Neural Networks: Theory, Methods, and Algorithms [2.266704469122763]
  This paper proposes a new methodology for performing Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems where the prior knowledge is available in the form of training data. We establish the existence and well-posedness of the associated posterior moments under easily verifiable conditions. A model accuracy analysis suggests that the Bayesian probability probabilities reported by the data-driven models are also remarkably accurate under a frequentist definition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T11:34:08Z)
• Toward Scalable and Unified Example-based Explanation and Outlier Detection [128.23117182137418]
  We argue for a broader adoption of prototype-based student networks capable of providing an example-based explanation for their prediction. We show that our prototype-based networks beyond similarity kernels deliver meaningful explanations and promising outlier detection results without compromising classification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T05:58:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.