Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05762v1
• Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:50:11 GMT
• Title: Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap
• Authors: Alexander D'Amour and Alexander Franks
• Abstract summary: We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
• Score: 140.98628848491146
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A key condition for obtaining reliable estimates of the causal effect of a treatment is overlap (a.k.a. positivity): the distributions of the features used to perform causal adjustment cannot be too different in the treated and control groups. In cases where overlap is poor, causal effect estimators can become brittle, especially when they incorporate weighting. To address this problem, a number of proposals (including confounder selection or dimension reduction methods) incorporate feature representations to induce better overlap between the treated and control groups. A key concern in these proposals is that the representation may introduce confounding bias into the effect estimator. In this paper, we introduce deconfounding scores, which are feature representations that induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. As a proof of concept, we characterize a family of deconfounding scores in a simplified setting with Gaussian covariates, and show that in some simple simulations, these scores can be used to construct estimators with good finite-sample properties. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations that are often applied to IPW and balancing weights.

Related papers

• RHALE: Robust and Heterogeneity-aware Accumulated Local Effects [8.868822699365616]
  Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) is a widely-used explainability method for isolating the average effect of a feature on the output. It does not quantify the deviation of instance-level (local) effects from the average (global) effect, known as heterogeneity. We propose Robust and Heterogeneity-aware ALE (RHALE) to address these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:27:41Z)
• Leveraging Factored Action Spaces for Off-Policy Evaluation [0.0]
  Off-policy evaluation (OPE) aims to estimate the benefit of following a counterfactual sequence of actions. Existing OPE estimators often exhibit high bias and high variance in problems involving large, decomposed action spaces. We propose a new family of "decomposed" importance sampling (IS) estimators based on factored action spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T18:34:14Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Counterfactual Estimation [12.159830463756341]
  We propose a probabilistic paradigm to estimate a diverse set of counterfactuals. We treat the perturbations as random variables endowed with prior distribution functions. A gradient based sampler with superior convergence characteristics efficiently computes the posterior samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T00:21:11Z)
• Orthogonal Series Estimation for the Ratio of Conditional Expectation Functions [2.855485723554975]
  This chapter develops the general framework for estimation and inference on conditional expectation functions (CEFR) We derive the pointwise and uniform results for estimation and inference on CEFR, including the validity of the Gaussian bootstrap. We apply the proposed method to estimate the causal effect of the 401(k) program on household assets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-26T13:01:17Z)
• Ensembling over Classifiers: a Bias-Variance Perspective [13.006468721874372]
  We build upon the extension to the bias-variance decomposition by Pfau (2013) in order to gain crucial insights into the behavior of ensembles of classifiers. We show that conditional estimates necessarily incur an irreducible error. Empirically, standard ensembling reducesthe bias, leading us to hypothesize that ensembles of classifiers may perform well in part because of this unexpected reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T17:46:35Z)
• Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach [94.10051154390237]
  Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification. Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Deconfounded Score Method: Scoring DAGs with Dense Unobserved Confounding [101.35070661471124]
  We show that unobserved confounding leaves a characteristic footprint in the observed data distribution that allows for disentangling spurious and causal effects. We propose an adjusted score-based causal discovery algorithm that may be implemented with general-purpose solvers and scales to high-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:07:59Z)
• Almost-Matching-Exactly for Treatment Effect Estimation under Network Interference [73.23326654892963]
  We propose a matching method that recovers direct treatment effects from randomized experiments where units are connected in an observed network. Our method matches units almost exactly on counts of unique subgraphs within their neighborhood graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:21:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.