From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of
coordination and convention
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05857v1
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:00:40 GMT
- Title: From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of
coordination and convention
- Authors: Robert D. Hawkins, Michael Franke, Michael C. Frank, Kenny Smith,
Thomas L. Griffiths, Noah D. Goodman
- Abstract summary: We argue that the central computational problem of communication is not simply transmission, but learning and adaptation over multiple timescales.
We present new empirical data alongside simulations showing how our model provides a cognitive foundation for explaining several phenomena.
- Score: 25.131987884154054
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Languages are powerful solutions to coordination problems: they provide
stable, shared expectations about how the words we say correspond to the
beliefs and intentions in our heads. Yet language use in a variable and
non-stationary social environment requires linguistic representations to be
flexible: old words acquire new ad hoc or partner-specific meanings on the fly.
In this paper, we introduce a hierarchical Bayesian theory of convention
formation that aims to reconcile the long-standing tension between these two
basic observations. More specifically, we argue that the central computational
problem of communication is not simply transmission, as in classical
formulations, but learning and adaptation over multiple timescales. Under our
account, rapid learning within dyadic interactions allows for coordination on
partner-specific common ground, while social conventions are stable priors that
have been abstracted away from interactions with multiple partners. We present
new empirical data alongside simulations showing how our model provides a
cognitive foundation for explaining several phenomena that have posed a
challenge for previous accounts: (1) the convergence to more efficient
referring expressions across repeated interaction with the same partner, (2)
the gradual transfer of partner-specific common ground to novel partners, and
(3) the influence of communicative context on which conventions eventually
form.
Related papers
- Decentralised Emergence of Robust and Adaptive Linguistic Conventions in
Populations of Autonomous Agents Grounded in Continuous Worlds [4.63732827131233]
This paper introduces a methodology through which a population of autonomous agents can establish a linguistic convention.
The convention emerges in a decentralised manner through local communicative interactions between pairs of agents.
We show that the methodology enables a population to converge on a communicatively effective, coherent and human-interpretable linguistic convention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T16:11:35Z) - Regularized Conventions: Equilibrium Computation as a Model of Pragmatic
Reasoning [72.21876989058858]
We present a model of pragmatic language understanding, where utterances are produced and understood by searching for regularized equilibria of signaling games.
In this model speakers and listeners search for contextually appropriate utterance--meaning mappings that are both close to game-theoretically optimal conventions and close to a shared, ''default'' semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T09:42:36Z) - Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual
Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships [7.415975372963896]
We introduce a new approach to identifying inappropriate communication by explicitly modeling the social relationship between the individuals.
We show that large language models can readily incorporate relationship information to accurately identify appropriateness in a given context.
We also demonstrate that contextual-appropriateness judgments are predictive of other social factors expressed in language such as condescension and politeness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-06T04:06:05Z) - MindDial: Belief Dynamics Tracking with Theory-of-Mind Modeling for Situated Neural Dialogue Generation [62.44907105496227]
MindDial is a novel conversational framework that can generate situated free-form responses with theory-of-mind modeling.
We introduce an explicit mind module that can track the speaker's belief and the speaker's prediction of the listener's belief.
Our framework is applied to both prompting and fine-tuning-based models, and is evaluated across scenarios involving both common ground alignment and negotiation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T07:24:32Z) - ChatGPT Evaluation on Sentence Level Relations: A Focus on Temporal,
Causal, and Discourse Relations [52.26802326949116]
We quantitatively evaluate the performance of ChatGPT, an interactive large language model, on inter-sentential relations.
ChatGPT exhibits exceptional proficiency in detecting and reasoning about causal relations.
It is capable of identifying the majority of discourse relations with existing explicit discourse connectives, but the implicit discourse relation remains a formidable challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-28T13:14:36Z) - Shades of confusion: Lexical uncertainty modulates ad hoc coordination
in an interactive communication task [8.17947290421835]
We propose a communication task based on color-concept associations.
In Experiment 1, we establish several key properties of the mental representations of these expectations.
In Experiment 2, we examine the downstream consequences of these representations for communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-13T20:42:28Z) - Discourse Relation Embeddings: Representing the Relations between
Discourse Segments in Social Media [8.51950029432202]
We propose representing discourse relations as points in high dimensional continuous space.
Unlike words, discourse relations often have no surface form.
We present a novel method for automatically creating discourse relation embeddings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T05:58:27Z) - On the Critical Role of Conventions in Adaptive Human-AI Collaboration [73.21967490610142]
We propose a learning framework that teases apart rule-dependent representation from convention-dependent representation.
We experimentally validate our approach on three collaborative tasks varying in complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T02:46:19Z) - Learning to Decouple Relations: Few-Shot Relation Classification with
Entity-Guided Attention and Confusion-Aware Training [49.9995628166064]
We propose CTEG, a model equipped with two mechanisms to learn to decouple easily-confused relations.
On the one hand, an EGA mechanism is introduced to guide the attention to filter out information causing confusion.
On the other hand, a Confusion-Aware Training (CAT) method is proposed to explicitly learn to distinguish relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-21T11:07:53Z) - Joint Constrained Learning for Event-Event Relation Extraction [94.3499255880101]
We propose a joint constrained learning framework for modeling event-event relations.
Specifically, the framework enforces logical constraints within and across multiple temporal and subevent relations.
We show that our joint constrained learning approach effectively compensates for the lack of jointly labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T22:45:28Z) - Generalizing meanings from partners to populations: Hierarchical
inference supports convention formation on networks [31.07078356126945]
A key property of linguistic conventions is that they hold over an entire community of speakers.
We propose a hierarchical Bayesian model to explain how speakers and listeners solve this inductive problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-04T19:30:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.