Developing a Conversational Recommendation System for Navigating Limited Options

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06552v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:46:10 GMT
• Title: Developing a Conversational Recommendation System for Navigating Limited Options
• Authors: Victor S. Bursztyn (1), Jennifer Healey (2), Eunyee Koh (2), Nedim Lipka (2), Larry Birnbaum (1) ((1) Northwestern University, (2) Adobe)
• Abstract summary: We have developed a conversational recommendation system designed to help users navigate through a set of limited options to find the best choice. Unlike many internet scale systems that use a singular set of search terms and return a ranked list of options from amongst thousands, our system uses multi-turn user dialog to deeply understand the users preferences.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We have developed a conversational recommendation system designed to help users navigate through a set of limited options to find the best choice. Unlike many internet scale systems that use a singular set of search terms and return a ranked list of options from amongst thousands, our system uses multi-turn user dialog to deeply understand the users preferences. The system responds in context to the users specific and immediate feedback to make sequential recommendations. We envision our system would be highly useful in situations with intrinsic constraints, such as finding the right restaurant within walking distance or the right retail item within a limited inventory. Our research prototype instantiates the former use case, leveraging real data from Google Places, Yelp, and Zomato. We evaluated our system against a similar system that did not incorporate user feedback in a 16 person remote study, generating 64 scenario-based search journeys. When our recommendation system was successfully triggered, we saw both an increase in efficiency and a higher confidence rating with respect to final user choice. We also found that users preferred our system (75%) compared with the baseline.

Related papers

• Utilizing Collaborative Filtering in a Personalized Research-Paper Recommendation System [0.0]
  Research-paper recommendation system is a system that is developed for people with common research interests. Based on the test of top-n similar users of the target user research paper recommendations have been made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T06:47:30Z)
• System-2 Recommenders: Disentangling Utility and Engagement in Recommendation Systems via Temporal Point-Processes [80.97898201876592]
  We propose a generative model in which past content interactions impact the arrival rates of users based on a self-exciting Hawkes process. We show analytically that given samples it is possible to disentangle System-1 and System-2 and allow content optimization based on user utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T18:19:37Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
  In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback. The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied. We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z)
• User-Controllable Recommendation via Counterfactual Retrospective and Prospective Explanations [96.45414741693119]
  We present a user-controllable recommender system that seamlessly integrates explainability and controllability. By providing both retrospective and prospective explanations through counterfactual reasoning, users can customize their control over the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T01:13:36Z)
• Improving Recommendation System Serendipity Through Lexicase Selection [53.57498970940369]
  We propose a new serendipity metric to measure the presence of echo chambers and homophily in recommendation systems. We then attempt to improve the diversity-preservation qualities of well known recommendation techniques by adopting a parent selection algorithm known as lexicase selection. Our results show that lexicase selection, or a mixture of lexicase selection and ranking, outperforms its purely ranked counterparts in terms of personalization, coverage and our specifically designed serendipity benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T15:37:38Z)
• DRIFT: A Federated Recommender System with Implicit Feedback on the Items [0.0]
  DRIFT is a federated architecture for recommender systems, using implicit feedback. Our learning model is based on a recent algorithm for recommendation with implicit feedbacks SAROS. Our algorithm is secure, and participants in our federated system cannot guess the interactions made by the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T13:12:33Z)
• Comparison-based Conversational Recommender System with Relative Bandit Feedback [15.680698037463488]
  We propose a novel comparison-based conversational recommender system. We propose a new bandit algorithm, which we call RelativeConUCB. The experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate the advantage of our proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-21T08:05:46Z)
• Self-Supervised Bot Play for Conversational Recommendation with Justifications [3.015622397986615]
  We develop a new two-part framework for training conversational recommender systems. First, we train a recommender system to jointly suggest items and justify its reasoning with subjective aspects. We then fine-tune this model to incorporate iterative user feedback via self-supervised bot-play.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T20:07:41Z)
• Measuring Recommender System Effects with Simulated Users [19.09065424910035]
  Popularity bias and filter bubbles are two of the most well-studied recommender system biases. We offer a simulation framework for measuring the impact of a recommender system under different types of user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T14:51:11Z)
• Improving Conversational Question Answering Systems after Deployment using Feedback-Weighted Learning [69.42679922160684]
  We propose feedback-weighted learning based on importance sampling to improve upon an initial supervised system using binary user feedback. Our work opens the prospect to exploit interactions with real users and improve conversational systems after deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T19:50:34Z)
• Survey for Trust-aware Recommender Systems: A Deep Learning Perspective [48.2733163413522]
  It becomes critical to embrace a trustworthy recommender system. This survey provides a systemic summary of three categories of trust-aware recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T02:11:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.