Classification of head impacts based on the spectral density of
measurable kinematics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09082v1
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:58:43 GMT
- Title: Classification of head impacts based on the spectral density of
measurable kinematics
- Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yiheng Li, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Samuel J.
Raymond, Zhou Zhou, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Jesse Ruan, Saeed Barbat, Stephen
Tiernan, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B.
Camarillo
- Abstract summary: Traumatic brain injury can be caused by head impacts.
Brain injury risk estimation models are less accurate across the variety of impacts that patients may undergo.
Data was analyzed from 3262 head impacts from head model simulations, on-field data from American football and mixed martial arts.
- Score: 4.784679555552413
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Traumatic brain injury can be caused by head impacts, but many brain injury
risk estimation models are less accurate across the variety of impacts that
patients may undergo. In this study, we investigated the spectral
characteristics of different head impact types with kinematics classification.
Data was analyzed from 3262 head impacts from head model simulations, on-field
data from American football and mixed martial arts (MMA) using our instrumented
mouthguard, and publicly available car crash data. A random forest classifier
with spectral densities of linear acceleration and angular velocity was built
to classify different types of head impacts (e.g., football, MMA), reaching a
median accuracy of 96% over 1000 random partitions of training and test sets.
Furthermore, to test the classifier on data from different measurement devices,
another 271 lab-reconstructed impacts were obtained from 5 other instrumented
mouthguards with the classifier reaching over 96% accuracy from these devices.
The most important features in classification included both low-frequency and
high-frequency features, both linear acceleration features and angular velocity
features. It was found that different head impact types had different
distributions of spectral densities in low-frequency and high-frequency ranges
(e.g., the spectral densities of MMA impacts were higher in high-frequency
range than in the low-frequency range). Finally, with head impact
classification, type-specific, nearest-neighbor regression models were built
for 95th percentile maximum principal strain, 95th percentile maximum principal
strain in corpus callosum, and cumulative strain damage (15th percentile). This
showed a generally higher R^2-value than baseline models without
classification.
Related papers
- Deep Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain Imaging: Large-Scale Benchmarking and Bias Analysis [42.60508892284938]
We present a large-scale, multi-center benchmark of deep unsupervised anomaly detection for brain imaging.<n>We tested 2,221 T1w and 1,262 T2w scans spanning healthy datasets and diverse clinical cohorts.<n>Our benchmark establishes a transparent foundation for future research and highlights priorities for clinical translation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T11:03:27Z) - Distinguishing Startle from Surprise Events Based on Physiological Signals [44.17042547618593]
We identify startle and surprise events based on physiological signals using machine learning and multi-modal fusion strategies.<n>Our results demonstrate that these events can be reliably predicted, achieving a highest mean accuracy of 85.7% with SVM and Late Fusion.<n>To further validate the robustness of our model, we extended the evaluation to include a baseline condition, successfully differentiating between Startle, Surprise, and Baseline states with a highest mean accuracy of 74.9% with XGBoost and Late Fusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-11T19:02:13Z) - Multi-Attention Stacked Ensemble for Lung Cancer Detection in CT Scans [3.8121150313479655]
Three pretrained backbones are adapted with a custom classification head tailored to 96 x 96 pixel inputs.<n>A two-stage attention mechanism learns both model-wise and class-wise importance scores from logits.<n>Experiments on the LIDC-IDRI dataset demonstrate exceptional performance, achieving 98.09 accuracy and 0.9961 AUC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-27T11:03:07Z) - Evaluating ML Robustness in GNSS Interference Classification, Characterization & Localization [42.14439854721613]
Jamming devices disrupt signals from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS)
This paper introduces an extensive dataset comprising snapshots obtained from a low-frequency antenna.
Our objective is to assess the resilience of machine learning (ML) models against environmental changes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T15:20:33Z) - Identification of head impact locations, speeds, and force based on head kinematics [1.6562617234384265]
This study presents a deep learning model developed to accurately predict head impact information.
The models accurately predict the impact parameters describing impact location, direction, speed, and the impact force profile.
The model significantly outperformed existing methods, achieving a 79.7% accuracy in identifying impact locations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-12T16:07:15Z) - Understanding the Detrimental Class-level Effects of Data Augmentation [63.1733767714073]
achieving optimal average accuracy comes at the cost of significantly hurting individual class accuracy by as much as 20% on ImageNet.
We present a framework for understanding how DA interacts with class-level learning dynamics.
We show that simple class-conditional augmentation strategies improve performance on the negatively affected classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T18:37:43Z) - How Does Pruning Impact Long-Tailed Multi-Label Medical Image
Classifiers? [49.35105290167996]
Pruning has emerged as a powerful technique for compressing deep neural networks, reducing memory usage and inference time without significantly affecting overall performance.
This work represents a first step toward understanding the impact of pruning on model behavior in deep long-tailed, multi-label medical image classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T20:40:30Z) - Denoising instrumented mouthguard measurements of head impact kinematics
with a convolutional neural network [1.3280207637024473]
Wearable sensors for measuring head kinematics can be noisy due to imperfect interfaces with the body.
Deep learning is used to compensate for the imperfect interface and improve measurement accuracy.
Models can be used to improve detection of head impacts and TBI risk evaluation, and potentially extended to other sensors measuring kinematics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T20:08:40Z) - DeepAdversaries: Examining the Robustness of Deep Learning Models for
Galaxy Morphology Classification [47.38422424155742]
In morphological classification of galaxies, we study the effects of perturbations in imaging data.
We show that training with domain adaptation improves model robustness and mitigates the effects of these perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-28T21:29:02Z) - On the Frequency Bias of Generative Models [61.60834513380388]
We analyze proposed measures against high-frequency artifacts in state-of-the-art GAN training.
We find that none of the existing approaches can fully resolve spectral artifacts yet.
Our results suggest that there is great potential in improving the discriminator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T18:12:11Z) - Data-driven decomposition of brain dynamics with principal component
analysis in different types of head impacts [2.216657815393579]
Strain and strain rate are effective traumatic brain injury predictors.
Kinematics-based models estimating these metrics suffer from significant different distributions of both kinematics and the injury metrics across head impact types.
We have previously shown the kinematic features vary largely across head impact types, resulting in different patterns of brain deformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T01:38:01Z) - Rapidly and accurately estimating brain strain and strain rate across
head impact types with transfer learning and data fusion [2.216657815393579]
Brain strain and strain rate are effective in predicting traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by head impacts.
FEM demands considerable computational time in the computation, limiting its application in real-time TBI risk monitoring.
Machine learning head models (MLHMs) were developed, and the model accuracy was found to decrease when the training/test datasets were from different head impacts types.
We trained and tested the MLHMs on 13,623 head impacts from simulations, American football, mixed martial arts, car crash, and compared against the models trained on only simulations or only on-field impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-31T01:45:20Z) - Kinematics clustering enables head impact subtyping for better traumatic
brain injury prediction [2.1108097398435337]
Traumatic brain injury can be caused by various types of head impacts.
Many brain injury risk estimation models are not generalizable across the variety of impacts that humans may sustain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-07T18:31:05Z) - Risk Bounds for Over-parameterized Maximum Margin Classification on
Sub-Gaussian Mixtures [100.55816326422773]
We study the phenomenon of the maximum margin classifier for linear classification problems.
Our results precisely characterize the condition under which benign overfitting can occur.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-28T08:25:16Z) - Capturing scattered discriminative information using a deep architecture
in acoustic scene classification [49.86640645460706]
In this study, we investigate various methods to capture discriminative information and simultaneously mitigate the overfitting problem.
We adopt a max feature map method to replace conventional non-linear activations in a deep neural network.
Two data augment methods and two deep architecture modules are further explored to reduce overfitting and sustain the system's discriminative power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T08:32:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.