Scalable Benchmarks for Gate-Based Quantum Computers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10698v1
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:00:12 GMT
- Title: Scalable Benchmarks for Gate-Based Quantum Computers
- Authors: Arjan Cornelissen, Johannes Bausch, and Andr\'as Gily\'en
- Abstract summary: We develop and release an advanced quantum benchmarking framework.
It measures the performance of universal quantum devices in a hardware-agnostic way.
We present the benchmark results of twenty-one different quantum devices from IBM, Rigetti and IonQ.
- Score: 5.735035463793008
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In the near-term "NISQ"-era of noisy, intermediate-scale, quantum hardware
and beyond, reliably determining the quality of quantum devices becomes
increasingly important: users need to be able to compare them with one another,
and make an estimate whether they are capable of performing a given task ahead
of time. In this work, we develop and release an advanced quantum benchmarking
framework in order to help assess the state of the art of current quantum
devices. Our testing framework measures the performance of universal quantum
devices in a hardware-agnostic way, with metrics that are aimed to facilitate
an intuitive understanding of which device is likely to outperform others on a
given task. This is achieved through six structured tests that allow for an
immediate, visual assessment of how devices compare. Each test is designed with
scalability in mind, making this framework not only suitable for testing the
performance of present-day quantum devices, but also of those released in the
foreseeable future. The series of tests are motivated by real-life scenarios,
and therefore emphasise the interplay between various relevant characteristics
of quantum devices, such as qubit count, connectivity, and gate and measurement
fidelity. We present the benchmark results of twenty-one different quantum
devices from IBM, Rigetti and IonQ.
Related papers
- On-Chip Verified Quantum Computation with an Ion-Trap Quantum Processing Unit [0.5497663232622965]
We present and experimentally demonstrate a novel approach to verification and benchmarking of quantum computing.
Unlike previous information-theoretically secure verification protocols, our approach is implemented entirely on-chip.
Our results pave the way for more accessible and efficient verification and benchmarking strategies in near-term quantum devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T16:54:41Z) - A Quantum-Classical Collaborative Training Architecture Based on Quantum
State Fidelity [50.387179833629254]
We introduce a collaborative classical-quantum architecture called co-TenQu.
Co-TenQu enhances a classical deep neural network by up to 41.72% in a fair setting.
It outperforms other quantum-based methods by up to 1.9 times and achieves similar accuracy while utilizing 70.59% fewer qubits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T14:09:41Z) - Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform
verification [60.01590250213637]
Cross-platform verification, a critical undertaking in the realm of early-stage quantum computing, endeavors to characterize the similarity of two imperfect quantum devices executing identical algorithms.
We introduce an innovative multimodal learning approach, recognizing that the formalism of data in this task embodies two distinct modalities.
We devise a multimodal neural network to independently extract knowledge from these modalities, followed by a fusion operation to create a comprehensive data representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T04:35:03Z) - Evaluating Three Levels of Quantum Metrics on Quantum-Inspire Hardware [0.0]
This begs the question of which device excels at which tasks and how to compare these different quantum devices with one another.
Different metrics focus on different aspects of (quantum) devices and choosing the right metric to benchmark one device against another is a difficult choice.
In this paper we aim to give an overview of this zoo of metrics by grouping established metrics in three levels: component level, system level and application level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T11:54:12Z) - Benchmarking a trapped-ion quantum computer with 30 qubits [0.2276773223605655]
We benchmark a single-chain 30-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all operations.
We build a system-level model to predict the application benchmarking data through direct simulation.
This highlights that as quantum computers move toward larger and higher-quality devices, characterization becomes more challenging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-09T17:02:55Z) - Extending the Q-score to an Application-level Quantum Metric Framework [0.0]
evaluating the performance of quantum devices is an important step towards scaling quantum devices and eventually using them in practice.
A prominent quantum metric is given by the Q-score metric of Atos.
We show that the Q-score defines a framework of quantum metrics, which allows benchmarking using different problems, user settings and solvers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-01T18:03:13Z) - Potential and limitations of quantum extreme learning machines [55.41644538483948]
We present a framework to model QRCs and QELMs, showing that they can be concisely described via single effective measurements.
Our analysis paves the way to a more thorough understanding of the capabilities and limitations of both QELMs and QRCs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T09:32:28Z) - Iterative Qubits Management for Quantum Index Searching in a Hybrid
System [56.39703478198019]
IQuCS aims at index searching and counting in a quantum-classical hybrid system.
We implement IQuCS with Qiskit and conduct intensive experiments.
Results demonstrate that it reduces qubits consumption by up to 66.2%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-22T21:54:28Z) - Anticipative measurements in hybrid quantum-classical computation [68.8204255655161]
We present an approach where the quantum computation is supplemented by a classical result.
Taking advantage of its anticipation also leads to a new type of quantum measurements, which we call anticipative.
In an anticipative quantum measurement the combination of the results from classical and quantum computations happens only in the end.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-12T15:47:44Z) - QSAN: A Near-term Achievable Quantum Self-Attention Network [73.15524926159702]
Self-Attention Mechanism (SAM) is good at capturing the internal connections of features.
A novel Quantum Self-Attention Network (QSAN) is proposed for image classification tasks on near-term quantum devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T12:22:51Z) - Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing [0.0]
benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users.
Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-07T01:45:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.