Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03137v3
• Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:20:47 GMT
• Title: Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
• Authors: Thomas Lubinski, Sonika Johri, Paul Varosy, Jeremiah Coleman, Luning Zhao, Jason Necaise, Charles H. Baldwin, Karl Mayer, Timothy Proctor
• Abstract summary: benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.

Related papers

• Quantum Subroutine for Variance Estimation: Algorithmic Design and Applications [80.04533958880862]
  Quantum computing sets the foundation for new ways of designing algorithms. New challenges arise concerning which field quantum speedup can be achieved. Looking for the design of quantum subroutines that are more efficient than their classical counterpart poses solid pillars to new powerful quantum algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T09:32:07Z)
• Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification [60.01590250213637]
  Cross-platform verification, a critical undertaking in the realm of early-stage quantum computing, endeavors to characterize the similarity of two imperfect quantum devices executing identical algorithms. We introduce an innovative multimodal learning approach, recognizing that the formalism of data in this task embodies two distinct modalities. We devise a multimodal neural network to independently extract knowledge from these modalities, followed by a fusion operation to create a comprehensive data representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T04:35:03Z)
• Quantum utility -- definition and assessment of a practical quantum advantage [0.0]
  Different use-cases come with different requirements for size, weight, power consumption, or data privacy. This paper aims to incorporate these characteristics into a concept coined quantum utility. It demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of quantum computers for various applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T18:33:46Z)
• Optimization Applications as Quantum Performance Benchmarks [0.0]
  Combinatorial optimization is anticipated to be one of the primary use cases for quantum computation in the coming years. Inspired by existing methods to characterize classical optimization algorithms, we analyze the solution quality obtained by solving Max-Cut problems. This is used to guide the development of an advanced benchmarking framework for quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T01:56:06Z)
• Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage [56.22441723982983]
  We develop a framework for quantum resource estimation, abstracting the layers of the stack, to estimate resources required for large-scale quantum applications. We assess three scaled quantum applications and find that hundreds of thousands to millions of physical qubits are needed to achieve practical quantum advantage. A goal of our work is to accelerate progress towards practical quantum advantage by enabling the broader community to explore design choices across the stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T18:50:27Z)
• Anticipative measurements in hybrid quantum-classical computation [68.8204255655161]
  We present an approach where the quantum computation is supplemented by a classical result. Taking advantage of its anticipation also leads to a new type of quantum measurements, which we call anticipative. In an anticipative quantum measurement the combination of the results from classical and quantum computations happens only in the end.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T15:47:44Z)
• Decomposition of Matrix Product States into Shallow Quantum Circuits [62.5210028594015]
  tensor network (TN) algorithms can be mapped to parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs) We propose a new protocol for approximating TN states using realistic quantum circuits. Our results reveal one particular protocol, involving sequential growth and optimization of the quantum circuit, to outperform all other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T17:08:41Z)
• QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking [1.0323063834827415]
  This paper presents the benchmark score definitions of QPack, an application-oriented cross-platform benchmarking suite for quantum computers and simulators. A comparison is made between various quantum computer simulators, running both locally and on vendors' remote cloud services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T15:18:24Z)
• Benchmarking quantum co-processors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic and scalable way [0.0]
  We introduce a new benchmark, dubbed Atos Q-score (TM) The Q-score measures the maximum number of qubits that can be used effectively to solve the MaxCut optimization problem. We provide an open-source implementation of Q-score that makes it easy to compute the Q-score of any quantum hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T16:26:23Z)
• Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithms [88.71725630554758]
  We propose a resource and runtime efficient scheme termed quantum architecture search (QAS) QAS automatically seeks a near-optimal ansatz to balance benefits and side-effects brought by adding more noisy quantum gates. We implement QAS on both the numerical simulator and real quantum hardware, via the IBM cloud, to accomplish data classification and quantum chemistry tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T12:06:27Z)
• Application-Motivated, Holistic Benchmarking of a Full Quantum Computing Stack [0.0]
  Quantum computing systems need to be benchmarked in terms of practical tasks they would be expected to do. We propose 3 "application-motivated" circuit classes for benchmarking: deep, shallow, and square. We quantify the performance of quantum computing system in running circuits from these classes using several figures of merit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T21:21:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.