Practical Verification of Quantum Properties in Quantum Approximate
Optimization Runs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01639v1
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:33:15 GMT
- Title: Practical Verification of Quantum Properties in Quantum Approximate
Optimization Runs
- Authors: M. Sohaib Alam, Filip A. Wudarski, Matthew J. Reagor, James Sud, Shon
Grabbe, Zhihui Wang, Mark Hodson, P. Aaron Lott, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Davide
Venturelli
- Abstract summary: We show that measurements in no more than 3 out of the possible $3N$ bases can reconstruct the single-qubit reduced density matrices and measure the ability to create coherent superpositions.
We demonstrate that a subset of such observables can serve as entanglement witnesses for QAOA-MaxCut states, and further argue that they are especially well tailored for this purpose by defining and computing an entanglement potency metric on witnesses.
- Score: 9.661732401406587
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In order to assess whether quantum resources can provide an advantage over
classical computation, it is necessary to characterize and benchmark the
non-classical properties of quantum algorithms in a practical manner. In this
paper, we show that using measurements in no more than 3 out of the possible
$3^N$ bases, one can not only reconstruct the single-qubit reduced density
matrices and measure the ability to create coherent superpositions, but also
possibly verify entanglement across all $N$ qubits participating in the
algorithm. We introduce a family of generalized Bell-type observables for which
we establish an upper bound to the expectation values in fully separable states
by proving a generalization of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, which may serve
of independent interest. We demonstrate that a subset of such observables can
serve as entanglement witnesses for QAOA-MaxCut states, and further argue that
they are especially well tailored for this purpose by defining and computing an
entanglement potency metric on witnesses. A subset of these observables also
certify, in a weaker sense, the entanglement in GHZ states, which share the
$\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry of QAOA-MaxCut. The construction of such witnesses
follows directly from the cost Hamiltonian to be optimized, and not through the
standard technique of using the projector of the state being certified. It may
thus provide insights to construct similar witnesses for other variational
algorithms prevalent in the NISQ era. We demonstrate our ideas with
proof-of-concept experiments on the Rigetti Aspen-9 chip for ansatze containing
up to 24 qubits.
Related papers
- $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric mapping of three states and its implementation on a cloud quantum processor [0.9599644507730107]
We develop a new $mathcalPT$-symmetric approach for mapping three pure qubit states.
We show consistency with the Hermitian case, conservation of average projections on reference vectors, and Quantum Fisher Information.
Our work unlocks new doors for applying $mathcalPT$-symmetry in quantum communication, computing, and cryptography.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T18:51:33Z) - Certifying sets of quantum observables with any full-rank state [0.0]
We show that some sets of quantum observables are unique up to an isometry and have a contextuality witness that attains the same value for any initial state.
We prove that these two properties make it possible to certify any of these sets by looking at the statistics of experiments with sequential measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-11T18:03:00Z) - A simple formulation of no-cloning and no-hiding that admits efficient
and robust verification [0.0]
Incompatibility is a feature of quantum theory that sets it apart from classical theory.
The no-hiding theorem is another such instance that arises in the context of the black-hole information paradox.
We formulate both of these fundamental features of quantum theory in a single form that is amenable to efficient verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-05T12:48:11Z) - Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical.
We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more.
Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z) - Guidable Local Hamiltonian Problems with Implications to Heuristic Ansätze State Preparation and the Quantum PCP Conjecture [0.0]
We study 'Merlinized' versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem.
These problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists.
We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are $mathsfQCMA$-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T19:00:00Z) - Theory of Quantum Generative Learning Models with Maximum Mean
Discrepancy [67.02951777522547]
We study learnability of quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs) and quantum generative adversarial networks (QGANs)
We first analyze the generalization ability of QCBMs and identify their superiorities when the quantum devices can directly access the target distribution.
Next, we prove how the generalization error bound of QGANs depends on the employed Ansatz, the number of qudits, and input states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T08:05:59Z) - Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation [77.34726150561087]
We develop new and efficient quantum algorithms for fidelity estimation with provable performance guarantees.
Our algorithms use advanced quantum linear algebra techniques, such as the quantum singular value transformation.
We prove that fidelity estimation to any non-trivial constant additive accuracy is hard in general.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T02:02:16Z) - Realization of arbitrary doubly-controlled quantum phase gates [62.997667081978825]
We introduce a high-fidelity gate set inspired by a proposal for near-term quantum advantage in optimization problems.
By orchestrating coherent, multi-level control over three transmon qutrits, we synthesize a family of deterministic, continuous-angle quantum phase gates acting in the natural three-qubit computational basis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-03T17:49:09Z) - Machine-Learning-Derived Entanglement Witnesses [55.76279816849472]
We show a correspondence between linear support vector machines (SVMs) and entanglement witnesses.
We use this correspondence to generate entanglement witnesses for bipartite and tripartite qubit (and qudit) target entangled states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T22:28:02Z) - Experimental quantum state measurement with classical shadows [5.455606108893398]
A crucial subroutine for various quantum computing and communication algorithms is to efficiently extract different classical properties of quantum states.
We show how to project the quantum state into classical shadows and simultaneously predict $M$ different functions of a state with only $mathcalO(log M)$ measurements.
Our experiment verifies the efficacy of exploiting (derandomized) classical shadows and sheds light on efficient quantum computing with noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-18T15:42:03Z) - State preparation and measurement in a quantum simulation of the O(3)
sigma model [65.01359242860215]
We show that fixed points of the non-linear O(3) sigma model can be reproduced near a quantum phase transition of a spin model with just two qubits per lattice site.
We apply Trotter methods to obtain results for the complexity of adiabatic ground state preparation in both the weak-coupling and quantum-critical regimes.
We present and analyze a quantum algorithm based on non-unitary randomized simulation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-28T23:44:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.