Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03356v1
• Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 16:13:36 GMT
• Title: Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation
• Authors: Dominik Dellermann, Nikolaus Lipusch, Philipp Ebel, and Jan Marco Leimeister
• Abstract summary: This paper develops design principles for a Hybrid Intelligence decision support system (HI-DSS) We follow a design science research approach to design a prototype artifact and a set of design principles. Our study provides prescriptive knowledge for HI-DSS and contributes to previous work on decision support for business models, the applications of complementary strengths of humans and machines for making decisions, and support systems for extremely uncertain decision-making problems.
• Score: 4.127347156839169
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: One of the most critical tasks for startups is to validate their business model. Therefore, entrepreneurs try to collect information such as feedback from other actors to assess the validity of their assumptions and make decisions. However, previous work on decisional guidance for business model validation provides no solution for the highly uncertain and complex context of earlystage startups. The purpose of this paper is, thus, to develop design principles for a Hybrid Intelligence decision support system (HI-DSS) that combines the complementary capabilities of human and machine intelligence. We follow a design science research approach to design a prototype artifact and a set of design principles. Our study provides prescriptive knowledge for HI-DSS and contributes to previous work on decision support for business models, the applications of complementary strengths of humans and machines for making decisions, and support systems for extremely uncertain decision-making problems.

Related papers

• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Generative Active Learning for Image Synthesis Personalization [57.01364199734464]
  This paper explores the application of active learning, traditionally studied in the context of discriminative models, to generative models. The primary challenge in conducting active learning on generative models lies in the open-ended nature of querying. We introduce the concept of anchor directions to transform the querying process into a semi-open problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T06:45:45Z)
• On Predictive planning and counterfactual learning in active inference [0.20482269513546453]
  In this paper, we examine two decision-making schemes in active inference based on 'planning' and 'learning from experience' We introduce a mixed model that navigates the data-complexity trade-off between these strategies. We evaluate our proposed model in a challenging grid-world scenario that requires adaptability from the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T04:02:31Z)
• PresAIse, A Prescriptive AI Solution for Enterprises [6.523929486550928]
  This paper outlines an initiative from IBM Research, aiming to address some of these challenges by offering a suite of prescriptive AI solutions. The solution suite includes scalable causal inference methods, interpretable decision-making approaches, and the integration of large language models. A proof-of-concept, PresAIse, demonstrates the solutions' potential by enabling non-ML experts to interact with prescriptive AI models via a natural language interface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T03:23:08Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models [235.7288855108172]
  Reasoning plays a pivotal role in various real-world settings such as negotiation, medical diagnosis, and criminal investigation. We introduce seminal foundation models proposed or adaptable for reasoning. We then delve into the potential future directions behind the emergence of reasoning abilities within foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T15:16:13Z)
• On Realization of Intelligent Decision-Making in the Real World: A Foundation Decision Model Perspective [54.38373782121503]
  A Foundation Decision Model (FDM) can be developed by formulating diverse decision-making tasks as sequence decoding tasks. We present a case study demonstrating our FDM implementation, DigitalBrain (DB1) with 1.3 billion parameters, achieving human-level performance in 870 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-24T06:16:45Z)
• Model-based Analysis and Specification of Functional Requirements and Tests for Complex Automotive Systems [0.19837121116620585]
  We propose a technique that starts with the early identification of validation concerns from a stakeholder perspective. We develop a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) methodology to ensure complete and consistent requirements and test specifications. Our study corroborates that our methodology is applicable and improves existing requirements and test specification processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-03T18:24:32Z)
• Learning Classifier Systems for Self-Explaining Socio-Technical-Systems [0.0]
  In socio-technical settings, operators are increasingly assisted by decision support systems. To be accepted by and engage efficiently with operators, decision support systems need to be able to provide explanations regarding the reasoning behind specific decisions. We present a template of seven questions to assess application-specific explainability needs and demonstrate their usage in an interview-based case study for a manufacturing scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T08:13:34Z)
• Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design Problems [0.0]
  Team Design Patterns (TDPs) describe successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component. This thesis describes a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system. A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T17:09:43Z)
• Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
  We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap. We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert. Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.