Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team
Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design
Problems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11211v1
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:09:43 GMT
- Title: Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team
Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design
Problems
- Authors: Jip van Stijn
- Abstract summary: Team Design Patterns (TDPs) describe successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component.
This thesis describes a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system.
A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Increasing automation in the healthcare sector calls for a Hybrid
Intelligence (HI) approach to closely study and design the collaboration of
humans and autonomous machines. Ensuring that medical HI systems'
decision-making is ethical is key. The use of Team Design Patterns (TDPs) can
advance this goal by describing successful and reusable configurations of
design problems in which decisions have a moral component, as well as through
facilitating communication in multidisciplinary teams designing HI systems. For
this research, TDPs were developed to describe a set of solutions for two
design problems in a medical HI system: (1) mitigating harmful biases in
machine learning algorithms and (2) sharing health and behavioral patient data
with healthcare professionals and system developers. The Socio-Cognitive
Engineering methodology was employed, integrating operational demands, human
factors knowledge, and a technological analysis into a set of TDPs. A survey
was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability,
effectiveness, and generalizability. The results showed that TDPs are a useful
method to unambiguously describe solutions for diverse HI design problems with
a moral component on varying abstraction levels, that are usable by a
heterogeneous group of multidisciplinary researchers. Additionally, results
indicated that the SCE approach and the developed questionnaire are suitable
methods for creating and assessing TDPs. The study concludes with a set of
proposed improvements to TDPs, including their integration with Interaction
Design Patterns, the inclusion of several additional concepts, and a number of
methodological improvements. Finally, the thesis recommends directions for
future research.
Related papers
- A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods.
By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z) - Automated Multi-Task Learning for Joint Disease Prediction on Electronic Health Records [4.159498069487535]
We propose an automated approach named AutoDP, which can search for the optimal configuration of task grouping and architectures simultaneously.
It achieves significant performance improvements over both hand-crafted and automated state-of-the-art methods, also maintains a feasible search cost at the same time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T22:32:48Z) - Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support*
Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit.
Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z) - Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A
Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis [34.19436164837297]
We build SepsisLab based on a state-of-the-art AI algorithm and extend it to predict the future projection of sepsis development.
We demonstrate that SepsisLab enables a promising human-AI collaboration paradigm for the future of AI-assisted sepsis diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T19:19:39Z) - Explainable AI applications in the Medical Domain: a systematic review [1.4419517737536707]
The field of Medical AI faces various challenges, in terms of building user trust, complying with regulations, using data ethically.
This paper presents a literature review on the recent developments of XAI solutions for medical decision support, based on a representative sample of 198 articles published in recent years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-10T08:12:17Z) - Applying Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Decision Support in Mental
Health: What Have We Learned? [0.0]
We present a case study of a recently developed AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of treatment in major depressive disorder.
We consider both the principles espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T21:40:51Z) - VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data
for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow.
We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence.
We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z) - Q-Pain: A Question Answering Dataset to Measure Social Bias in Pain
Management [5.044336341666555]
We introduce Q-Pain, a dataset for assessing bias in medical QA in the context of pain management.
We propose a new, rigorous framework, including a sample experimental design, to measure the potential biases present when making treatment decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-03T21:55:28Z) - MIMO: Mutual Integration of Patient Journey and Medical Ontology for
Healthcare Representation Learning [49.57261599776167]
We propose an end-to-end robust Transformer-based solution, Mutual Integration of patient journey and Medical Ontology (MIMO) for healthcare representation learning and predictive analytics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-20T07:04:52Z) - The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through
Simulation [81.72197368690031]
We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making.
The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z) - Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on
Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation.
adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation.
Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.