Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11211v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:09:43 GMT
• Title: Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design Problems
• Authors: Jip van Stijn
• Abstract summary: Team Design Patterns (TDPs) describe successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component. This thesis describes a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system. A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Increasing automation in the healthcare sector calls for a Hybrid Intelligence (HI) approach to closely study and design the collaboration of humans and autonomous machines. Ensuring that medical HI systems' decision-making is ethical is key. The use of Team Design Patterns (TDPs) can advance this goal by describing successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component, as well as through facilitating communication in multidisciplinary teams designing HI systems. For this research, TDPs were developed to describe a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system: (1) mitigating harmful biases in machine learning algorithms and (2) sharing health and behavioral patient data with healthcare professionals and system developers. The Socio-Cognitive Engineering methodology was employed, integrating operational demands, human factors knowledge, and a technological analysis into a set of TDPs. A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability. The results showed that TDPs are a useful method to unambiguously describe solutions for diverse HI design problems with a moral component on varying abstraction levels, that are usable by a heterogeneous group of multidisciplinary researchers. Additionally, results indicated that the SCE approach and the developed questionnaire are suitable methods for creating and assessing TDPs. The study concludes with a set of proposed improvements to TDPs, including their integration with Interaction Design Patterns, the inclusion of several additional concepts, and a number of methodological improvements. Finally, the thesis recommends directions for future research.

Related papers

• Exploring the Requirements of Clinicians for Explainable AI Decision Support Systems in Intensive Care [1.950650243134358]
  Thematic analysis revealed three core themes: (T1) ICU decision-making relies on a wide range of factors, (T2) the complexity of patient state is challenging for shared decision-making, and (T3) requirements and capabilities of AI decision support systems. We include design recommendations from clinical input, providing insights to inform future AI systems for intensive care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T17:53:07Z)
• DREAMS: A python framework to train deep learning models with model card reporting for medical and health applications [7.2934799091933815]
  We introduce a comprehensive deep learning framework tailored for EEG data processing, model training and report generation. While constructed in way to be adapted and developed further by AI developers, it enables to report, through model cards, the outcome and specific information of use for both developers and clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T13:12:13Z)
• Enhancing Medical Learning and Reasoning Systems: A Boxology-Based Comparative Analysis of Design Patterns [0.0]
  This study analyzes hybrid AI systems' design patterns and their effectiveness in clinical decision-making. Boxology's structured, modular apporach offers significant advantages in developing and analyzing hybrid AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T12:53:04Z)
• A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
  This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods. By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z)
• Automated Multi-Task Learning for Joint Disease Prediction on Electronic Health Records [4.159498069487535]
  We propose an automated approach named AutoDP, which can search for the optimal configuration of task grouping and architectures simultaneously. It achieves significant performance improvements over both hand-crafted and automated state-of-the-art methods, also maintains a feasible search cost at the same time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T22:32:48Z)
• Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
  Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support* Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit. Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z)
• Applying Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Decision Support in Mental Health: What Have We Learned? [0.0]
  We present a case study of a recently developed AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of treatment in major depressive disorder. We consider both the principles espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T21:40:51Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)
• MIMO: Mutual Integration of Patient Journey and Medical Ontology for Healthcare Representation Learning [49.57261599776167]
  We propose an end-to-end robust Transformer-based solution, Mutual Integration of patient journey and Medical Ontology (MIMO) for healthcare representation learning and predictive analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T07:04:52Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
  We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation. adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation. Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.