Transitioning from Real to Synthetic data: Quantifying the bias in model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04144v1
• Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 06:57:14 GMT
• Title: Transitioning from Real to Synthetic data: Quantifying the bias in model
• Authors: Aman Gupta, Deepak Bhatt and Anubha Pandey
• Abstract summary: This study aims to establish a trade-off between bias and fairness in the models trained using synthetic data. We demonstrate there exist a varying levels of bias impact on models trained using synthetic data.
• Score: 1.6134566438137665
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of generative modeling techniques, synthetic data and its use has penetrated across various domains from unstructured data such as image, text to structured dataset modeling healthcare outcome, risk decisioning in financial domain, and many more. It overcomes various challenges such as limited training data, class imbalance, restricted access to dataset owing to privacy issues. To ensure the trained model used for automated decisioning purposes makes a fair decision there exist prior work to quantify and mitigate those issues. This study aims to establish a trade-off between bias and fairness in the models trained using synthetic data. Variants of synthetic data generation techniques were studied to understand bias amplification including differentially private generation schemes. Through experiments on a tabular dataset, we demonstrate there exist a varying levels of bias impact on models trained using synthetic data. Techniques generating less correlated feature performs well as evident through fairness metrics with 94\%, 82\%, and 88\% relative drop in DPD (demographic parity difference), EoD (equality of odds) and EoP (equality of opportunity) respectively, and 24\% relative improvement in DRP (demographic parity ratio) with respect to the real dataset. We believe the outcome of our research study will help data science practitioners understand the bias in the use of synthetic data.

Related papers

• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• Assessment of Differentially Private Synthetic Data for Utility and Fairness in End-to-End Machine Learning Pipelines for Tabular Data [3.555830838738963]
  Differentially private (DP) synthetic data sets are a solution for sharing data while preserving the privacy of individual data providers. We identify the most effective synthetic data generation techniques for training and evaluating machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T03:37:16Z)
• Boosting Data Analytics With Synthetic Volume Expansion [3.568650932986342]
  This article explores the effectiveness of statistical methods on synthetic data and the privacy risks of synthetic data. A key finding within this framework is the generational effect, which reveals that the error rate of statistical methods on synthetic data decreases with the addition of more synthetic data but may eventually rise or stabilize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T01:57:27Z)
• Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
  Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models. ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task. This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Analyzing Effects of Fake Training Data on the Performance of Deep Learning Systems [0.0]
  Deep learning models frequently suffer from various problems such as class imbalance and lack of robustness to distribution shift. With the advent of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) it is now possible to generate high-quality synthetic data. We analyze the effect that various quantities of synthetic data, when mixed with original data, can have on a model's robustness to out-of-distribution data and the general quality of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T13:53:22Z)
• FairGen: Fair Synthetic Data Generation [0.3149883354098941]
  We propose a pipeline to generate fairer synthetic data independent of the GAN architecture. We claim that while generating synthetic data most GANs amplify bias present in the training data but by removing these bias inducing samples, GANs essentially focuses more on real informative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T08:13:47Z)
• An Analysis of the Deployment of Models Trained on Private Tabular Synthetic Data: Unexpected Surprises [4.129847064263057]
  Diferentially private (DP) synthetic datasets are a powerful approach for training machine learning models. We study the effects of differentially private synthetic data generation on classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T21:00:57Z)
• On the Efficacy of Adversarial Data Collection for Question Answering: Results from a Large-Scale Randomized Study [65.17429512679695]
  In adversarial data collection (ADC), a human workforce interacts with a model in real time, attempting to produce examples that elicit incorrect predictions. Despite ADC's intuitive appeal, it remains unclear when training on adversarial datasets produces more robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T00:48:33Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.