A Generalised Inverse Reinforcement Learning Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11812v1
• Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:30:45 GMT
• Title: A Generalised Inverse Reinforcement Learning Framework
• Authors: Firas Jarboui, Vianney Perchet
• Abstract summary: inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is to estimate the unknown cost function of some MDP base on observed trajectories. We introduce an alternative training loss that puts more weights on future states which yields a reformulation of the (maximum entropy) IRL problem. The algorithms we devised exhibit enhanced performances (and similar tractability) than off-the-shelf ones in multiple OpenAI gym environments.
• Score: 24.316047317028147
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The gloabal objective of inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is to estimate the unknown cost function of some MDP base on observed trajectories generated by (approximate) optimal policies. The classical approach consists in tuning this cost function so that associated optimal trajectories (that minimise the cumulative discounted cost, i.e. the classical RL loss) are 'similar' to the observed ones. Prior contributions focused on penalising degenerate solutions and improving algorithmic scalability. Quite orthogonally to them, we question the pertinence of characterising optimality with respect to the cumulative discounted cost as it induces an implicit bias against policies with longer mixing times. State of the art value based RL algorithms circumvent this issue by solving for the fixed point of the Bellman optimality operator, a stronger criterion that is not well defined for the inverse problem. To alleviate this bias in IRL, we introduce an alternative training loss that puts more weights on future states which yields a reformulation of the (maximum entropy) IRL problem. The algorithms we devised exhibit enhanced performances (and similar tractability) than off-the-shelf ones in multiple OpenAI gym environments.

Related papers

• Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward Inference [17.76565371753346]
  This paper develops two RLHF algorithms without reward inference. The key idea is to estimate the local value function difference from human preferences and then approximate the policy gradient with a zeroth-order gradient approximator. Our results show there exist provably efficient methods to solve general RLHF problems without reward inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T22:20:11Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences. To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model. Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL [71.77024922527642]
  We introduce Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:37:56Z)
• Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guarantees [56.848265937921354]
  Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover the reward function and the associated optimal policy. Many algorithms for IRL have an inherently nested structure. We develop a novel single-loop algorithm for IRL that does not compromise reward estimation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T17:13:45Z)
• Delayed Geometric Discounts: An Alternative Criterion for Reinforcement Learning [1.52292571922932]
  reinforcement learning (RL) proposes a theoretical background to learn optimal behaviors. In practice, RL algorithms rely on geometric discounts to evaluate this optimality. In this paper, we tackle these issues by generalizing the discounted problem formulation with a family of delayed objective functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T07:49:38Z)
• Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation [107.54516740713969]
  We study human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (RL) with trajectory preferences. Instead of receiving a numeric reward at each step, the agent only receives preferences over trajectory pairs from a human overseer. We propose the first optimistic model-based algorithm for PbRL with general function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T09:03:24Z)
• Anti-Concentrated Confidence Bonuses for Scalable Exploration [57.91943847134011]
  Intrinsic rewards play a central role in handling the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We introduce emphanti-concentrated confidence bounds for efficiently approximating the elliptical bonus. We develop a practical variant for deep reinforcement learning that is competitive with contemporary intrinsic rewards on Atari benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T15:25:15Z)
• Beyond variance reduction: Understanding the true impact of baselines on policy optimization [24.09670734037029]
  We show that learning dynamics are governed by the curvature of the loss function and the noise of the gradient estimates. We present theoretical results showing that, at least for bandit problems, curvature and noise are not sufficient to explain the learning dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T17:52:09Z)
• Towards Tractable Optimism in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [37.51073590932658]
  To be successful, an optimistic RL algorithm must over-estimate the true value function (optimism) but not by so much that it is inaccurate (estimation error) We re-interpret these scalable optimistic model-based algorithms as solving a tractable noise augmented MDP. We show that if this error is reduced, optimistic model-based RL algorithms can match state-of-the-art performance in continuous control problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T20:53:19Z)
• Optimistic Policy Optimization with Bandit Feedback [70.75568142146493]
  We propose an optimistic trust region policy optimization (TRPO) algorithm for which we establish $tilde O(sqrtS2 A H4 K)$ regret for previous rewards. To the best of our knowledge, the two results are the first sub-linear regret bounds obtained for policy optimization algorithms with unknown transitions and bandit feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-19T15:41:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.