Confident in the Crowd: Bayesian Inference to Improve Data Labelling in Crowdsourcing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13984v1
• Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:09:45 GMT
• Title: Confident in the Crowd: Bayesian Inference to Improve Data Labelling in Crowdsourcing
• Authors: Pierce Burke and Richard Klein
• Abstract summary: We present new techniques to improve the quality of the labels while attempting to reduce the cost. This paper investigates the use of more sophisticated methods, such as Bayesian inference, to measure the performance of the labellers. Our methods outperform the standard voting methods in both cost and accuracy while maintaining higher reliability when there is disagreement within the crowd.
• Score: 0.30458514384586394
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the increased interest in machine learning and big data problems, the need for large amounts of labelled data has also grown. However, it is often infeasible to get experts to label all of this data, which leads many practitioners to crowdsourcing solutions. In this paper, we present new techniques to improve the quality of the labels while attempting to reduce the cost. The naive approach to assigning labels is to adopt a majority vote method, however, in the context of data labelling, this is not always ideal as data labellers are not equally reliable. One might, instead, give higher priority to certain labellers through some kind of weighted vote based on past performance. This paper investigates the use of more sophisticated methods, such as Bayesian inference, to measure the performance of the labellers as well as the confidence of each label. The methods we propose follow an iterative improvement algorithm which attempts to use the least amount of workers necessary to achieve the desired confidence in the inferred label. This paper explores simulated binary classification problems with simulated workers and questions to test the proposed methods. Our methods outperform the standard voting methods in both cost and accuracy while maintaining higher reliability when there is disagreement within the crowd.

Related papers

• Drawing the Same Bounding Box Twice? Coping Noisy Annotations in Object Detection with Repeated Labels [6.872072177648135]
  We propose a novel localization algorithm that adapts well-established ground truth estimation methods. Our algorithm also shows superior performance during training on the TexBiG dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:08:44Z)
• Robust Assignment of Labels for Active Learning with Sparse and Noisy Annotations [0.17188280334580192]
  Supervised classification algorithms are used to solve a growing number of real-life problems around the globe. Unfortunately, acquiring good-quality annotations for many tasks is infeasible or too expensive to be done in practice. We propose two novel annotation unification algorithms that utilize unlabeled parts of the sample space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T19:40:41Z)
• Partial-Label Regression [54.74984751371617]
  Partial-label learning is a weakly supervised learning setting that allows each training example to be annotated with a set of candidate labels. Previous studies on partial-label learning only focused on the classification setting where candidate labels are all discrete. In this paper, we provide the first attempt to investigate partial-label regression, where each training example is annotated with a set of real-valued candidate labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T09:02:24Z)
• SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learning [101.86916775218403]
  This paper revisits the popular pseudo-labeling methods via a unified sample weighting formulation. We propose SoftMatch to overcome the trade-off by maintaining both high quantity and high quality of pseudo-labels during training. In experiments, SoftMatch shows substantial improvements across a wide variety of benchmarks, including image, text, and imbalanced classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T03:53:25Z)
• Debiased Pseudo Labeling in Self-Training [77.83549261035277]
  Deep neural networks achieve remarkable performances on a wide range of tasks with the aid of large-scale labeled datasets. To mitigate the requirement for labeled data, self-training is widely used in both academia and industry by pseudo labeling on readily-available unlabeled data. We propose Debiased, in which the generation and utilization of pseudo labels are decoupled by two independent heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T02:14:33Z)
• Robust Long-Tailed Learning under Label Noise [50.00837134041317]
  This work investigates the label noise problem under long-tailed label distribution. We propose a robust framework,algo, that realizes noise detection for long-tailed learning. Our framework can naturally leverage semi-supervised learning algorithms to further improve the generalisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T03:45:00Z)
• Boosting Semi-Supervised Face Recognition with Noise Robustness [54.342992887966616]
  This paper presents an effective solution to semi-supervised face recognition that is robust to the label noise aroused by the auto-labelling. We develop a semi-supervised face recognition solution, named Noise Robust Learning-Labelling (NRoLL), which is based on the robust training ability empowered by GN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T14:43:11Z)
• A Novel Perspective for Positive-Unlabeled Learning via Noisy Labels [49.990938653249415]
  This research presents a methodology that assigns initial pseudo-labels to unlabeled data which is used as noisy-labeled data, and trains a deep neural network using the noisy-labeled data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T11:46:02Z)
• OpinionRank: Extracting Ground Truth Labels from Unreliable Expert Opinions with Graph-Based Spectral Ranking [2.1930130356902207]
  crowdsourcing has emerged as a popular, inexpensive, and efficient data mining solution for performing distributed label collection. We propose OpinionRank, a model-free, interpretable, graph-based spectral algorithm for integrating crowdsourced annotations into reliable labels. Our experiments show that OpinionRank performs favorably when compared against more highly parameterized algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T08:12:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.