Self-Supervised Document Similarity Ranking via Contextualized Language Models and Hierarchical Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01186v1
• Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:29:35 GMT
• Title: Self-Supervised Document Similarity Ranking via Contextualized Language Models and Hierarchical Inference
• Authors: Dvir Ginzburg and Itzik Malkiel and Oren Barkan and Avi Caciularu and Noam Koenigstein
• Abstract summary: We introduce SDR, a self-supervised method for document similarity that can be applied to documents of arbitrary length. SDR can be effectively applied to extremely long documents, exceeding the 4,096 maximal token limits of Longformer. We publish two human-annotated test sets of long documents similarity evaluation.
• Score: 21.232963704793143
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a novel model for the problem of ranking a collection of documents according to their semantic similarity to a source (query) document. While the problem of document-to-document similarity ranking has been studied, most modern methods are limited to relatively short documents or rely on the existence of "ground-truth" similarity labels. Yet, in most common real-world cases, similarity ranking is an unsupervised problem as similarity labels are unavailable. Moreover, an ideal model should not be restricted by documents' length. Hence, we introduce SDR, a self-supervised method for document similarity that can be applied to documents of arbitrary length. Importantly, SDR can be effectively applied to extremely long documents, exceeding the 4,096 maximal token limits of Longformer. Extensive evaluations on large document datasets show that SDR significantly outperforms its alternatives across all metrics. To accelerate future research on unlabeled long document similarity ranking, and as an additional contribution to the community, we herein publish two human-annotated test sets of long documents similarity evaluation. The SDR code and datasets are publicly available.

Related papers

• Efficient Document Ranking with Learnable Late Interactions [73.41976017860006]
  Cross-Encoder (CE) and Dual-Encoder (DE) models are two fundamental approaches for query-document relevance in information retrieval. To predict relevance, CE models use joint query-document embeddings, while DE models maintain factorized query and document embeddings. Recently, late-interaction models have been proposed to realize more favorable latency-quality tradeoffs, by using a DE structure followed by a lightweight scorer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T22:50:48Z)
• Fine-Grained Distillation for Long Document Retrieval [86.39802110609062]
  Long document retrieval aims to fetch query-relevant documents from a large-scale collection. Knowledge distillation has become de facto to improve a retriever by mimicking a heterogeneous yet powerful cross-encoder. We propose a new learning framework, fine-grained distillation (FGD), for long-document retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T17:00:36Z)
• Document-Level Relation Extraction with Sentences Importance Estimation and Focusing [52.069206266557266]
  Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine the relation between two entities from a document of multiple sentences. We propose a Sentence Estimation and Focusing (SIEF) framework for DocRE, where we design a sentence importance score and a sentence focusing loss. Experimental results on two domains show that our SIEF not only improves overall performance, but also makes DocRE models more robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T03:20:07Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)
• Specialized Document Embeddings for Aspect-based Similarity of Research Papers [4.661692753666685]
  We treat aspect-based similarity as a classical vector similarity problem in aspect-specific embedding spaces. We represent a document not as a single generic embedding but as multiple specialized embeddings. Our approach mitigates potential risks arising from implicit biases by making them explicit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T07:35:26Z)
• Augmenting Document Representations for Dense Retrieval with Interpolation and Perturbation [49.940525611640346]
  Document Augmentation for dense Retrieval (DAR) framework augments the representations of documents with their Dense Augmentation and perturbations. We validate the performance of DAR on retrieval tasks with two benchmark datasets, showing that the proposed DAR significantly outperforms relevant baselines on the dense retrieval of both the labeled and unlabeled documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T09:07:38Z)
• Multi-Vector Models with Textual Guidance for Fine-Grained Scientific Document Similarity [11.157086694203201]
  We present a new scientific document similarity model based on matching fine-grained aspects. Our model is trained using co-citation contexts that describe related paper aspects as a novel form of textual supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T11:12:30Z)
• Efficient Clustering from Distributions over Topics [0.0]
  We present an approach that relies on the results of a topic modeling algorithm over documents in a collection as a means to identify smaller subsets of documents where the similarity function can be computed. This approach has proved to obtain promising results when identifying similar documents in the domain of scientific publications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T10:52:19Z)
• Aspect-based Document Similarity for Research Papers [4.661692753666685]
  We extend similarity with aspect information by performing a pairwise document classification task. We evaluate our aspect-based document similarity for research papers. Our results show SciBERT as the best performing system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T13:51:21Z)
• Fast(er) Reconstruction of Shredded Text Documents via Self-Supervised Deep Asymmetric Metric Learning [62.34197797857823]
  A central problem in automatic reconstruction of shredded documents is the pairwise compatibility evaluation of the shreds. This work proposes a scalable deep learning approach for measuring pairwise compatibility in which the number of inferences scales linearly. Our method has accuracy comparable to the state-of-the-art with a speed-up of about 22 times for a test instance with 505 shreds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T03:22:06Z)
• Pairwise Multi-Class Document Classification for Semantic Relations between Wikipedia Articles [5.40541521227338]
  We model the problem of finding the relationship between two documents as a pairwise document classification task. To find semantic relation between documents, we apply a series of techniques, such as GloVe, paragraph-s, BERT, and XLNet. We perform our experiments on a newly proposed dataset of 32,168 Wikipedia article pairs and Wikidata properties that define the semantic document relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-22T12:52:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.