Pitfalls of Explainable ML: An Industry Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07758v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:05:05 GMT
• Title: Pitfalls of Explainable ML: An Industry Perspective
• Authors: Sahil Verma, Aditya Lahiri, John P. Dickerson, Su-In Lee
• Abstract summary: Explanations sit at the core of desirable attributes of a machine learning (ML) system. The goal of explainable ML is to intuitively explain the predictions of a ML system, while adhering to the needs to various stakeholders.
• Score: 29.49574255183219
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As machine learning (ML) systems take a more prominent and central role in contributing to life-impacting decisions, ensuring their trustworthiness and accountability is of utmost importance. Explanations sit at the core of these desirable attributes of a ML system. The emerging field is frequently called ``Explainable AI (XAI)'' or ``Explainable ML.'' The goal of explainable ML is to intuitively explain the predictions of a ML system, while adhering to the needs to various stakeholders. Many explanation techniques were developed with contributions from both academia and industry. However, there are several existing challenges that have not garnered enough interest and serve as roadblocks to widespread adoption of explainable ML. In this short paper, we enumerate challenges in explainable ML from an industry perspective. We hope these challenges will serve as promising future research directions, and would contribute to democratizing explainable ML.

Related papers

• Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey [60.7614299984182]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in tasks such as visual question answering, visual understanding and reasoning. The extensive model size and high training and inference costs have hindered the widespread application of MLLMs in academia and industry. This survey provides a comprehensive and systematic review of the current state of efficient MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T12:37:10Z)
• Look Before You Decide: Prompting Active Deduction of MLLMs for Assumptive Reasoning [68.83624133567213]
  We show that most prevalent MLLMs can be easily fooled by the introduction of a presupposition into the question. We also propose a simple yet effective method, Active Deduction (AD), to encourage the model to actively perform composite deduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T15:53:27Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models [71.63375558033364]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) represented by GPT-4V has been a new rising research hotspot. This paper aims to trace and summarize the recent progress of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T15:21:52Z)
• MLCopilot: Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Solving Machine Learning Tasks [31.733088105662876]
  We aim to bridge the gap between machine intelligence and human knowledge by introducing a novel framework. We showcase the possibility of extending the capability of LLMs to comprehend structured inputs and perform thorough reasoning for solving novel ML tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T17:03:57Z)
• Interpretability and accessibility of machine learning in selected food processing, agriculture and health applications [0.0]
  Lack of interpretability of ML based systems is a major hindrance to widespread adoption of these powerful algorithms. New techniques are emerging to improve ML accessibility through automated model design. This paper provides a review of the work done to improve interpretability and accessibility of machine learning in the context of global problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T02:44:13Z)
• The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity [1.6932802756478726]
  Deployment of Machine Learning in cybersecurity is still at an early stage, revealing a significant discrepancy between research and practice. This paper is the first attempt to provide a holistic understanding of the role of ML in the entire cybersecurity domain. We highlight the advantages of ML with respect to human-driven detection methods, as well as the additional tasks that can be addressed by ML in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T10:56:08Z)
• Does Explainable Machine Learning Uncover the Black Box in Vision Applications? [1.0660480034605242]
  We argue that the current philosophy behind explainable ML suffers from certain limitations. We also provide perspectives on how explainablity in ML can benefit by relying on more rigorous principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T10:37:52Z)
• Declarative Machine Learning Systems [7.5717114708721045]
  Machine learning (ML) has moved from a academic endeavor to a pervasive technology adopted in almost every aspect of computing. Recent successes in applying ML in natural sciences revealed that ML can be used to tackle some of the hardest real-world problems humanity faces today. We believe the next wave of ML systems will allow a larger amount of people, potentially without coding skills, to perform the same tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T23:57:57Z)
• Understanding the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision Making [67.72855777115772]
  Machine learning (ML) is being applied to a diverse and ever-growing set of domains. In many cases, domain experts -- who often have no expertise in ML or data science -- are asked to use ML predictions to make high-stakes decisions. We investigate the ML usability challenges present in the domain of child welfare screening through a series of collaborations with child welfare screeners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T22:50:45Z)
• An Information-Theoretic Approach to Personalized Explainable Machine Learning [92.53970625312665]
  We propose a simple probabilistic model for the predictions and user knowledge. We quantify the effect of an explanation by the conditional mutual information between the explanation and prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-01T13:06:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.